Nuova Discussione
Rispondi
 
Stampa | Notifica email    
Autore

NOTABLES - People who make the news, not necessarily Church-related

Ultimo Aggiornamento: 26/05/2012 15:48
07/02/2009 15:20
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.510
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
Holocaust-denying bishop
says he will review the 'evidence'




BERLIN, Feb. 7 (Reuters) - A traditionalist Catholic bishop who denies the full extent of the Holocaust has said he must review historical evidence before considering an apology to Jews.

Pope Benedict outraged Jewish leaders and progressive Catholics last month when he lifted excommunications on Richard Williamson and three other traditionalists to try to heal a 20-year-old schism within the Church.

Asked why he had not apologized for his comments, Williamson told Germany's Spiegel magazine: "If I should discover that I have been at fault, then I will do so."

Williamson told Swedish television in an interview broadcast on January 21: "I believe there were no gas chambers." {That's not exactly what he said. He said he did not believe the gas chamnbers were used to kill Jews - if only because, he claimed, they did not function properly. Why don't the Reuters editors edit their reporter's copy at all for factual errors? Fact does not become irrelevant just because it concerns something 'trivial'.]

He said no more than 300,000 Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps, rather than the 6 million accepted by mainstream historians.

"I ask everyone to believe me that I did not deliberately say something false. I was, on the basis of my research in the 1980s, convinced of the accuracy of my comments," he told the weekly in an interview released on Saturday.

"Now I must examine everything again and look at the evidence," he added.

British-born Williamson apologized to the Pope late last month for the "unnecessary distress and problems" he caused him. But he did not recant or take back the Holocaust comments, which he called "imprudent."

The Vatican has said the Pope was not aware of Williamson's denial of the Holocaust when he lifted the excommunications. The Vatican ordered Williamson to publicly recant if he wants to serve as a prelate in the Church.


*********************************************************************

As the British profile about Williamson in the Mail showed, Williamson obviously suffers from intellectual arrogance and delusion, in which he ends up thinking only his own 'research' is right against overwhelming evidence from everyone else's data.

The Spanish accounts of his work at La Reja seminary say he has done a greta job of introducing a curriculum rich in language and the humanities. Perhaps as long as he doesn't do the teaching himself, he should stick to being an educator, but not as a bishop.




WILLIAMSON & FSSPX TRIED TO STOP
THE SWEDISH TV BROADCAST


I wish I had the time to check out whatever there is online about the following information provided in a kreuz.net article today.

It starts out by recycling information on the so-called Vatican dossier about the strings purportedly pulled behind the scenes, that led to the Vatican imbroglio over Bishop Williamson. The so-called dossier was reported last week by Vaticanistas Andrea Tornielli and Paolo Rodari, obviously from the same source.

What kreuz.net adds to that story has to do with Williamson, aalso pointing out the role of the German magazine Spiegel in all this.

Here is a translation of that part of the article, which carries the title 'Bishop Williamson wanted to stop the broadcast' [of his interview with Swedish TV):





...

The Vatican backgrounder reveals the association between the scheduled date of the Swedish TV broadcast and the announcement of the decree, as well as the links to French homosexual ideologues and the German newsmagazine Spiegel, which had reported about it on January 19, two days before the broadcast.

This led the Swedish newspapere Svenska Dagbladet to investigate the apparent conspiracy.

They spoke to newsmen Svensson und Fegan, who had interviewed Williamson. Both made it clear they had no intention to cause harm to the Pope, and that their conversation with Williamson (about the Holocaust) had been purely incidental. [According to other reports, they had suddenly asked him about the Holocaust at the end of an interview that had to do with his ordaining a Swedish convert to Catholicism in a suburb of Regensburg.]

They also said the pre-announcement about the program on the Internet was entirely according to the network's usual practice (of publicizing programs).

But they reported that the FSSPX had tried at the last minute to prevent the broadcast.

They said Mons. Fellay, the superior-general,sent Swedish TV a fax request before the broodacast saying, "It is shameless to use an interview about religion in order to address a controversial issue of international importance, with the obvious intention to distort and defame our religious community".

Even Bishop Williamson, through his lawyer, wrote the TV channel before the broadcast:

"We ask you not to publish any part of the interview or all of it on the Internet nor to use it on a broadcast".

The lawyer said that public disclosure of the interview was injurious to the basic rights of Williamson, particularly his rights as a public figure, since Williamson had given the interview explicitly for a documentary [about the ordination].

Svensson contradicted that postition, saying Williamson had not specified at all how and when they could use the interview, nor did he afterwards ask about how the interview would be used, much less set conditions about how it could be used.

He said all Williamson asked them after the interview was whether the taping was for a Swedish channel.


What this shows at the very least, is that as soon as the FSSPX and Williamson himself learned about the impending broadcast - and knowing that the lifting of the excommunication was imminent, they realized the inopportunity of the interview coming out at around the same time, and tried to stop it. But try to stop any exercise of 'free speech'!

[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 07/02/2009 16:34]
08/02/2009 22:35
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.537
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
What's Bishop Williamson up to?

With quite a few conflicting reports about him today, the most direct information we can get at this time is from his weekly blog. He chose to write this week a review of Beethoven's Eroica symphony, the conclusion of which may be seen in the snip below (read what message you will into his words!).

Note his 'post-script' that 'His Excellency is neither dying, dead nor retired'!



It may just be his English upbringing which makes him use 'courtly' forms of expression, but what might a psychologist make of his obvious choice to refer to himself in the third person?

What about his way of ostensibly escaping reality by writing a music review in the midst of all this? What is his clever mind playing at? Is he genuinely batty or simply posing as an extreme - but far from harmless - eccentric?

The reference to dying or dead, some observers have noted, may be due to the gossip which has been circulated - purportedly said by Cardinal Re in the presence of others on a bus taking people to St. Paul's Basilica for the January 25 Vespers - that Mons. Fellay told Cardinal Castrillon he should not worry about Williamson because he is suffering from some terminal illness and may only have a few weeks left to live.

And the reference to retirement was to reports by Argentine newspapers and picked up by some international news agencies - that the FFSPX intends to replace him as head of the seminary in La Reja with Mons. Galarreta, one of the other bishops in the group.

More important for the FSSPX is what Mons. Fellay plans to do about Williamson. he told his French interviewers from Famille Chretienne in confidence, but perhaps in fairness to the Holy Father, he should also let him know!




Damian Thompson on his Telegraph blog today takes as fact Ciguena de la Torre's unconfirmed insinuation - passed on by Rorate caeli - that Williamson has been sacked, and adds:

He should have been sacked years ago, when the SSPX first discovered he was a raving anti-Semite and Holocaust denier. It's awful to think of the damage this disgusting old man has done to the mission of the Holy Father.

The damage will be temporary, I hope. Perhaps Cardinal Angelo Sodano, the former Secretary of State who is still hanging around the Vatican despite his "retirement", might care to restrain some of his friends, who - according to my Rome contacts - are prolonging this affair beyond its shelf-life.

Sodano, it may be recalled, was a great supporter of the late Fr Marcial Maciel, disgraced founder of the Legionaries of Christ, while it was Pope Benedict who sent him into exile.

I've never quite thought Cardinal Sodano was 'friendly' to Benedict XVI, so I hope Thompson's Rome contacts are wrong. From what one reads, Sodano and associates have had decades to perfect their act of Byzantine plotting and back-stabbing - and 'Papino poverino' must be Sebastian taking all these slings and arrows.

But even if the that is so, I don't see what Sodano's championing of Maciel has anything to do with the FSSPX issue. Aftre all, John Paul II also championed Maciel. Unless Sodano is getting back at the Pope for the CDF's punishment of Maciel....

But that's almost trivial compared to Thompson's other blog entry today that "Ruth Gledhill's chasing after Pope Benedict like a bunny-boiler!" - referring to Gledhill's blog today (in the Times of London) ripping into the Pope's eexcom recall. In which all the arguments she marshals are from the ultra-lib playbook.

It's all 'eye of newt and toe of frog, wool of bat and tongue of dog' and other things far more yucky and toxic, for the witches' cualdron of the Pope's enemies.


[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 08/02/2009 23:05]
09/02/2009 02:05
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.539
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
Holocaust denier Williamson
won't retract just yet


February 7, 2009





I did not bother to check out the news agency reports yesterday based on Spiegel's interview with Bishop Williamson. It turns out the Spiegel item itself is fairly short and a rather dubious piece of journalism.

It is datelined Hamburg/Berlin and Williamson is in Argentina, so it must have been a telephone interview at best, or a written one by e-mail. Williamson's statements are limited to single sentences, and there is no follow-up at all, even when he says something questionable about human rights. Here is a translation:



HAMBURG/BERLIN - He has caused a deep crisis in the Catholic Church - but is not ready to resolve it just yet.

The controversial bishop of teh Fraternity of St. Pius V, Richard Williamson, is not retracting his ideas about the Holocaust for now, as the Church called on him to do.

He must first review the evidence, he told Spiegel. "When I find the evidence, then I will correct myself. But that will take time."

Along with 3 other excommunicated bishops of the FSSPX, Williamson was recently taken back into the Catholic Church by Pope Benedict XVI, who was reportedly;y unaware of Williamson's Holocaust denial.

Benedict's action has led to difficult tensions with the Jews, adn even Chancellor Angela Merkel stepped in and publicly criticized the German-born leader of the Catholic Church.

Williamson reiterated to Spiegel his criticism of the Second Vatican Council. He said Vatican-II texts were ambiguous. "That led to the theological chaos that he wave today."

The Second Vatican Council is widely interpreted as the contemporary renewal of the Catholic Church and rapprochement with the other Christian churches - both of which the conservative FSSPX disputes.

The bishop is also critical of universal human rights. "When human rights are taken to mean an objective order to be enforced by the state, then that always leads to anti-Christian policy."

With regard to the FSSPX, Williamson said that "under no circumstances" does he wish to 'further embarrass' the Church and the Fraternity. [Strange that not one of the news agencies reported this last statement.]


*********************************************************************

[C]Spiegel keeps an efficient running index of all the articles they have written on this issue, and one can easily believe they were in on this from the start and had a hand in fomenting the controversy. Some of the titles drip with hostility if not scorn and contempt for the Pope.

Last week, they had him on the cover under the heading 'DER ENTRUECKTE', which in the most benign sense means 'the one who was carried away' or 'the one who was ravished'. I hope one our native German-speaking members will give us a better translation of the sense in which Spiegel meant it.

I do not have a cast-iron stomach to deal with Spiegel's vitriol so unless I see from other news reports that they have something genuinely newsworthy, I won't be checking them out regularly.



P.S. I have just found some impressions written by an ex-Lefebvrian, now with Institut du Bon Pasteur, who knew Williamson, and he has interesting things to say. Will post when translated.

Also, I saw a French news item that says one of the other 3 bishops (the Frenchman Tissier), is also a Holocaust denier and probably a true anti-Semitic. If this is so, how come the media hound dogs have not sniffed him out yet? Are we going to have a Williamson Part 2? God fobrid. One is bad enough
.



2/9/09
P.S. I apologize. SPIEGEl did post the entire 'e-mail and fax' interview with Williamson in English on their International site:
www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,606323,00.html

I simply assumed it would be on their German site as Williamson is known to speak German very well. The English transcript says it was conducted in German and translated to English for the itnernational service.

It must be read in full. He tries to rationalize his position on the Holcaust, not very convincingly, but makes very clear his position on Vatican II and on the Jews. And he does not come off in the least as a flake or a bigot on these two issues.

But his good faith on the Holocaust is really questionable, because for someone as widely-read as he is, it's hard to believe he would base all his statements on 'research' he did in the 1980s - by which time there had already been a torrent of well-documented accounts of the Holocaust on the market. [The great wave came during and after the Adolf Eichmann trial in the mid-60s.] Even I as a teenager living in a Third World country had access to the major accounts on the Holocaust, having developed a passion for World War II and all things related after reading the Diary of Anne Frank.

And now, he is preparing to 'reconsider' his ideas on the primary basis of a book about the gas chambers? He does seem to have an 'idee fize' monomania about the Holocaust.

On all other things he was asked about, the man is not clueless. Consider his answer to the last question:

SPIEGEL: Your statements and the lifting of your excommunication have triggered protests worldwide. Can you understand this?

Williamson: A single interview on Swedish television has dominated the news for weeks in Germany. Yes, it does surprise me. Is this the case with all violations of the law in Germany? Hardly. No, I am only the tool here, so that action can be taken against the SSPX and the Pope. Apparently Germany's leftist Catholicism has not yet forgiven Ratzinger for becoming Pope.

He even grants implicitly that his statements may well be 'a violation of the law in Germany' - although his lawyer is seeking to have any charges dismissed, on the ground that he made the statements to Swedish TV and did not think it would air in Germany. {Which explains what his Swedish interviewers said later that the only question he asked them after the inteview was whether the material was for airing on Sweedish TV.] It's still a disingenuous attempt - to avoid criminal prosecution, not to deny the statements.

Also, when he wrote on his blog that he was neither 'dead, dying nor retired', he should have said in good faith 'not retired but no longer director of this seminary'.

Not at all an easy man to 'rehabilitate' - but apparently not a monster either.


P.P.S. Looking for something 'automatic' to do to help get over grieving for Eluana, let me post the entire Spiegel interview here, for the record:


SPIEGEL INTERVIEW WITH BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON
'I Will Not Travel to Auschwitz'

Bishop Richard Williamson's denial of the Holocaust has done serious damage to the Catholic Church. In an e-mail and fax exchange with SPIEGEL, the ultra-conservative bishop says that he is willing to "review the historical evidence."

SPIEGEL: The Vatican is demanding that you retract your denial of the Holocaust, and it is threatening to not allow you to resume your activities as a bishop. How will you react?

Williamson: Throughout my life, I have always sought the truth. That is why I converted to Catholicism and became a priest. And now I can only say something, the truth of which I am convinced. Because I realize that there are many honest and intelligent people who think differently, I must now review the historical evidence once again. I said the same thing in my interview with Swedish television: Historical evidence is at issue, not emotions. And if I find this evidence, I will correct myself. But that will take time.

SPIEGEL: How can an educated Catholic deny the Holocaust?

Williamson: I addressed the subject in the 1980s. I had read various writings at the time. I cited the Leuchter report (eds. note: a debunked theory produced in the 1980s claiming erroneously that the Nazi gas chambers were technically impractical) in the interview, and it seemed plausible to me. Now I am told that it has been scientifically refuted. I plan now to look into it.

SPIEGEL: You could travel to Auschwitz yourself.

Williamson: No, I will not travel to Auschwitz. I've ordered the book by Jean-Claude Pressac. It's called "Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers." A printout is now being sent to me, and I will read it and study it.

SPIEGEL: The Society of Saint Pius X has set an ultimatum for the end of February. Are you not risking a break with the group?

Williamson: In the Old Testament, the Prophet Jonah tells the sailors when their ship is in distress: " Take me up, and cast me forth into the sea; so shall the sea be calm unto you: for I know that for my sake this great tempest is upon you."

The Society has a religious mission that is suffering because of me. I will now examine the historic evidence. If I do not find it convincing, I will do everything in my power to avoid inflicting any further harm on the Church and the Society.

SPIEGEL: What does the repeal of the excommunication by Pope Benedict XVI mean to you?

Williamson: We just want to be Catholic, nothing else. We have not developed our own teachings, but are merely preserving the things that the Church has always taught and practiced. And in the sixties and seventies, when everything was changed in the name of this Council (eds. note: the Second Vatican Council), it was suddenly a scandal. As a result, we were forced to the margins of the church, and now that empty churches and an aging clergy make it clear that these changes were a failure, we are returning to the center. That's the way it is for us conservatives: we are proved right, as long as we wait long enough.

SPIEGEL: People at the Vatican claimed that they didn't know you. Is that true?

Williamson: Most contacts pass through Bishop Fellay and the General Council, of which I am not a member. But three of us four bishops attended a private dinner with Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos in 2000. It was more about getting to know each other, but we certainly talked about theological issues and even a bit of philosophy. The cardinal was very friendly.

SPIEGEL: The Second Vatican Council counts as one of the great achievements of the Catholic Church. Why do you not fully recognize it?

Williamson: It is absolutely unclear what we are supposed to recognize. An important document is called "Gaudium et spes," or Joy and Hope. In it, the writers rhapsodize about the ability of mass tourism to bring people together. But one can hardly expect a conservative society to embrace package tours. It discusses fears and hardships. And then a nuclear war between the superpowers is mentioned. You see, much of this is already outdated. These Council documents are always ambiguous. Because no one knew what exactly this was supposed to mean, everyone started doing as he wished shortly after the Council. This has resulted in this theological chaos we have today. What are we supposed to recognize, the ambiguity or the chaos?

SPIEGEL: Are you actually aware that you are dividing the Church with your extreme views?

Williamson: Only violation of the dogmas, that is, the infallible principles, destroys faith. The Second Vatican Council declared that it would proclaim no new dogmas. Today the liberal bishops act as though it were some sort of all-encompassing super-dogma, and they use it as justification for a dictatorship of relativism. This contradicts the texts of the Council.

SPIEGEL: Your position on Judaism is consistently anti-Semitic.

Williamson: St. Paul put it this way: The Jews are beloved for the sake of Our Father, but our enemies for the sake of the gospel.

SPIEGEL: Do you seriously intend to use Catholic tradition and the Bible to justify your anti-Semitism?

Williamson: Anti-Semitism means many things today, for instance, when one criticizes the Israeli actions in the Gaza Strip. The Church has always understood the definition of anti-Semitism to be the rejection of Jews because of their Jewish roots. This is condemned by the Church. Incidentally, this is self-evident in a religion whose founders and all important individuals in its early history were Jews. But it was also clear, because of the large number of Jewish Christians in early Christianity, that all men need Christ for their salvation -- all men, including the Jews.

SPIEGEL: The pope will travel to Israel soon, where he plans to visit the Holocaust Memorial. Are you also opposed to this?

Williamson: Making a pilgrimage to the Holy Land is a great joy for Christians. I wish the Holy Father all the best on his journey. What troubles me about Yad Vashem is that Pope Pius XII is attacked there, even though no one saved more Jews during the Nazi period than he did. For instance, he had baptismal certificates issued for persecuted Jews to protect them against arrest. These facts have been distorted to mean exactly the opposite. Otherwise, I hope that the pope will also have an eye and a heart for the women and children who were injured in the Gaza Strip, and that he will speak out in support of the Christian population in Bethlehem, which is now walled in.

SPIEGEL: Your statements have caused great injury and outrage in the Jewish world. Why don't you apologize?

Williamson: If I realize that I have made an error, I will apologize. I ask every human being to believe me when I say that I did not deliberately say anything untrue. I was convinced that my comments were accurate, based on my research in the 1980s. Now I must review everything again and look at the evidence.

SPIEGEL: Do you at least recognize universal human rights?

Williamson: When human rights were declared in France, hundreds of thousands were killed throughout France. Where human rights are considered an objective order for the state to implement, there are constantly anti-Christian policies. When it comes to preserving the individual's freedom of conscience against the democratic state, then human rights perform an important function. The individual needs these rights against a country that behaves like a Leviathan. But the Christian concept of the state is a different one, so that the Christian theories of human rights emphasize that freedom is not an end in itself. The point is not freedom from something, but freedom for something. For good.

SPIEGEL: Your statements and the lifting of your excommunication have triggered protests worldwide. Can you understand this?

Williamson: A single interview on Swedish television has dominated the news for weeks in Germany. Yes, it does surprise me. Is this the case with all violations of the law in Germany? Hardly. No, I am only the tool here, so that action can be taken against the SSPX and the pope. Apparently Germany's leftist Catholicism has not yet forgiven Ratzinger for becoming pope.


Interview conducted by Peter Wensierski and Steffen Winter.
Conducted in German and translated into English by Christopher Sultan.



[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 10/02/2009 00:08]
10/02/2009 05:13
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.554
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
HERE'S A MODEL FOR A BISHOP
CATHOLICS NEED AND DESERVE TO HAVE


Bishop Martino of Scranton:
In the tradition of New York's
late Cardinal O'Connor

By Deal W. Hudson, Ph.D.
www.insidecatholic.com

2/9/09


WASHINGTON, D.C. (Inside Catholic) - Recently I've begun to notice a resemblance between Scranton's Bishop Joseph Francis Martino and another Philadelphia-born bishop, John Cardinal O'Connor.

Bishop Martino is outspoken, and his direct, almost pugnacious, criticism is reminiscent of the late cardinal of New York.

Both Martino and O'Connor attended St. Charles Borromeo Seminary before seeking graduate degrees -- Martino at Rome's Gregorian University, in church history; O'Connor at Villanova, in ethics, and Georgetown University, in political science.

Pope John Paul II appointed both as bishops -- O'Connor in 1979, Martino in 1996. O'Connor, like Martino, would go to Scranton but remained there only one year (1983-84) before being chosen, to everyone's surprise, as archbishop of New York.

For a Catholic bishop, O'Connor, at 64, was still a relatively young man when he left for New York. Martino will turn 63 on May 1.

Am I suggesting that Bishop Martino is destined to follow his predecessor to New York? No, that isn't likely to happen; controversial bishops rarely receive prestigious appointments. O'Connor's relatively low profile early in his career (thanks to a lack of public controversies) made it unlikely he would be blackballed in the selection process.

Bishop Martino's presence in Scranton is a case of being in the right place at the right time. First of all, Scranton's moderate size and its location in northeastern Pennsylvania give Bishop Martino the opportunity to bring about substantive changes in the Catholic culture of his diocese and state.

In addition, Scranton is the hometown of Vice-President Joseph Biden. Bishop Martino's stated position that he would deny communion to the vice president of the United States stands as a constant reminder of the dilemma facing Catholic Democrats with the Obama administration's efforts to remove all legal restrictions to abortion.

"No Catholic politician who supports the culture of death should approach Holy Communion," Bishop Martino said, regarding Biden. "I will be truly vigilant on this point."

Bishop Martino's pro-life leadership during the election has been cited as an influence in getting Pennsylvania Catholics to buck the national trend and vote for John McCain, 52 to 48 percent. The story of his crashing a seminar on the USCCB document "Faithful Citizenship" at one of his own parishes was easily the most dramatic, and colorful, Catholic moment in the campaign. "People, this is madness," he said after hearing a panelist explain how Catholics could vote for a pro-abortion politician in good conscience.

But when he told those gathered at St. John's Parish, "The USCCB doesn't speak for me," Bishop Martino could have been channeling Cardinal O'Connor of the 1980s when he (and Bernard Cardinal Law) battled the "seamless garment" message emitted from the bishops' conference.

More recently, Bishop Martino has shown some of Cardinal O'Connor's willingness to take on Catholic politicians by name. It was the latter's 1983 face-off over abortion with vice-presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro that came to mind as I read Bishop Martino's public letter to Sen. Bob Casey Jr.

In his letter, Bishop Martino asked Senator Casey to reconsider his vote against affirming the Mexico City Policy. Casey had voted against an amendment offered to a children's health insurance bill by Sen. Mel Martinez (R-FL):

"It is the height of irony that this amendment was defeated while the Senate passed legislation to provide health insurance for children who would otherwise be without it. What hypocrisy offers health insurance to children in one part of the world when children in another part will be deprived, by the stroke of the same pen, of their first breath?"

The local media have been reporting a decline in Bishop Martino's popularity due to his "interference" in politics, but he pays no attention to such criticism. In a 2004 interview in the Scranton Sunday Times, he explained:

"All these bugaboos about separation of church and state are brought up, which are just not true. What that really means is, "Shut up bishop, shut up." I have a right to speak up like any other citizen, and I have a right to remind Catholics -- that's my duty -- to remind Catholics it's not what they can do but what they should do. I think that's something that they haven't heard enough of, and they'll hear it from me."

What Bishop Martino promised four years ago, he has delivered. Over the past decade, Catholics have been blessed with the leadership of several notable bishops, but with the emergence of Bishop Joseph Martino, we are witnessing the bold style of a fellow son of Philadelphia, the late Cardinal O'Connor.

10/02/2009 21:29
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 3.567
Registrato il: 23/11/2005
Utente Master

Czech Cardinal Vlk to resign in spring

CTK
10.02.2009
Prague

Prague Archbishop Cardinal Miloslav Vlk will resign in the spring as his term expires, Vlk, who is 77, confirmed to CTK today.

Two years ago, when he was 75, he tendered his resignation, as all Catholic bishops did under canonic law, to Pope Benedict XVI.

However, the Pope did not accept it and extended his mandate by another two years.

"It will be my duty to tender my resignation again. I will do this in May by a normal letter as I did two years ago. It will be up to the Pope to decide," said Vlk, who was born on May 17, 1932.

In January, Vlk told journalists he believed the Pope would accept his resignation before his visit to the Czech Republic, planned for the end of September.

"I do not think I will bother the Pope with the affair during his visit as it is a rather private thing," Vlk said.

Vlk's personal relations with the Pope are allegedly tense. When the Pope headed the Vatican Congregation for the Teaching of Belief as Joseph Ratzinger, his position on a number of issues was reportedly more rigid than that held by Vlk.

Vlk and Ratzinger clashed in the 1990s when Vlk tried to integrate in the church service the priests who had served in the underground structures under the Communist regime.

Vlk recently criticised the Pope for having cancelled the excommunication of British Bishop Richard Williamson, a Holocaust denier.

Daily Pravo writes today that Bohemian and Moravian bishops have earmarked three candidates who are to succeed Vlk.

Pravo writes Strahov Abbot Michael Pojezdny is one of the candidates. However, Olomouc Archbishop Jan Graubner, whose views are very close to Benedict XVI, is considered the most serious candidate for the post.

Plzen Bishop Frantisek Radkovsky has been suggested, too, but his health problems have probably frustrated his chances.

13/02/2009 22:35
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.586
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
Pope names conservative parish priest
as auxiliary bishop of Linz:
Bishop Schwarz 'happy' with the choice

Translated from



I am carrying over a topic originally noted and commented upon in NEWS ABOUT BENEDICT because it involves yet another decision of Pope Benedict XVI that the media have now zoomed on, since the FSSPX outcry appears to be effectively over as the' polemique du jour' - the better to show a 'pattern' of 'defective' decision-making....

I am starting with the original announcement in KATH.NET, a Catholic news agency serving the German-speaking countries
.





LINZ, January 31 (kath.net) - Pope Benedict XVI has named the parish priest of Windischgarsten in Upper Austria, Dr. Gerhard Maria Wagner, as the auxiliary bishop for the Diocese of Linz. This was announced simultaneously at the Vatican and in Linz on Saturday afternoon.

Fr. Wagner told KATHNET that he was 'very happy' about his nomination and 'very excited' about his new assignment.

Wagner was born on July 17, 1954, in Linz to the working class family of Anna and Franz Wagner, grew up in the Muehl district and attended the public school in Wartberg/Aist. He earned his high school diploma from the Collegium Petrinum in Linz.

After two years in the local seminary, he continued his priestly training from 1974 to 1979 at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome. He was ordained in October 1978 in Rome by the Hungarian Cardinal Lekay. One year later, he was assigned as chaplain in Bad Ischl, where his assignment was primarily to minister to young people and families.

In the autumn of 1984, Wagner returned to Rome to pursue further studied in theology, earning his doctorate summa cum laude from the Gregorian University. Other than his native German, He is fluent in English, Italian, French and Spanish.

He was appointed parish priest of Windischgarsten on Sept. 11, 1988. His parish now counts as the most flourishing parish in the diocese of Linz. The faithful are very devoted to attendance at Mass as well as Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament and prayer circles.

Since 1985, the Blessed Sacrament has been exposed for Adoration daily from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. in the parish church. In the past few years about 40 different prayer groups have been formed among his parishioners.

Wagner, who is never seen in public in other than priestly garments, is well-loved by most of the parish residents who consider him very friendly and easily accessible.

His model for a parish priest is the 'Cure of Ars' (St. John Vianney). and like him, he often hears his parishioners' confessions himself.

Young people are a special concern for him. Often playing football with them or skiing, Wagner is almost always to be found among his young parishioners, and the parish counts with a great number of altar attendants.

Wagner also succeeded to enlist many laymen to carry out parish responsibilities. He is proficient in the Internet and his home page for the parish is regularly updated.

The new bishop-to-be has laid particularly emphasis on building the faith among his parishioners. His parish newspaper is read far beyond the confines of his parish as a model parish organ, and is able to treat theological and spiritual questions effectively unlike many church newspapers.

The parish of Windischgarsten will lose a very good parish priest, the Diocese of Linz will get a very good auxiliary bishop, and Bishop Ludwig Schwarz a very good and loyal co-worker on which he can rely 100 percent.

At the announcement of the nomination, Bishop Schwarz made this statement:

"I thank God and am very happy that through the Pope I have been given an auxiliary bishop who, I very much hope and wish, will be a genuine help for me and for the Diocese".

"His studies in Rome have made Mons. Wagner very much grounded in theology and he has a wealth of pastoral experience behind him.

"He will dedicate himself above all to children and young people. He loves the Church and has served with dedication and commitment. I heartily welcome the new Auxiliary Bishop of Linz and call on all the faithful to welcome him openly".

Mons. Wagner's episcopal ordination is scheduled to take place on Sunday, March 22, at the Mariendom of Linz.


The bishop-to-be is obviously not a benighted lout, unless the Pontifical Jesuit university in Rome gives doctorates in theology, summa cum laude, to benighted louts.

It is also apparent that Kath-Net's first news report on him did not mention his comments about Harry Potter and Katrina, which subsequent news reports would emphasize without giving any idea of his qualifications as a priest.

Here now is another positive view of Mons. Wagner from a man who rarely speaks out about anything that does not have to do with his work at the Pontifical Council for the Laity.





A good word from the Vatican
Translated from




ROME, February 11 (kath.net) - In the Vatican there's a contradictory position to the outrcy in Austria against the newly named Auxiliary Bishop of Linz, Gerhard Maria Wagner.

"I see it as a replay of a subject that has been played out before", says the Curial Bishop Josef Clemens, secretary of the Pontifical Council for the Laity, who told the German newspaper Die Presse that it was similar to the protests against St. Poeltner Bishop Kurt Krenn in the late 1980s.

"Also, you cannot reduce anyone to a couple of statements he has made," Clemens noted, referring to Wagner's reported statements about Harry Potter, the tsunami, and Katrina.

He said the media hue and cry in Austria was a result of incomplete and inaccurate reporting by news agencies - an echo effect and rehashing of stale themes, whereas there have only been positive reports from Wagner's parish.

"I do not know of any outcry against Mons. Wagner in Windischgarsten," Clemens said.

Wagner has been in Rome this week, as were Archbishop Christoph Schoenborn of Vienna and Bishop Egon Kapellari of Graz-Seckau who visited the Pope this week independently.

Schoenborn met the Pope on Sunday, and Kapellari planned to stay until Thusrday with a group of of visiting Styrian bishops.

Benedikt Steinschulte, the only German-speaking official in the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, said about Mons. Wagner: "He lived and studied in Rome for some time. That makes for good relations and contacts".

Wagner studied at the Jesuit-run Pontifical Gregorian Unviersity from 1974 to 1979 and earned a doctorate in theology, summa cum laude.

Steinschulte said the nomination dossiers for Wagner came from Cardinal Schoenborn, from the Apostolic Nuncio in Austria, and what he called 'an informal structure' for information gathering.


[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 14/02/2009 00:18]
14/02/2009 00:36
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.588
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
Vatican watcher says Pope
has chosen Archbishop Timothy Dolan
to succeed Cardinal Egan in New York





Haven't had a chance to check out Paolo Rodari's report, but CNA has summarized it here:


Rome, Italy, Feb 13, 2009 (CNA).- The eagerly anticipated appointment of the new Archbishop of New York appears to be just around the corner. The well-connected Italian journalist Paolo Rodari, who writes for Il Reformista, is reporting that Archbishop Timothy Dolan of Milwaukee will soon be announced as the new head of the most important U.S. diocese.



Church watchers have been itching to hear who will replace Cardinal Edward Egan for almost two years and as Rodari reports, "the announcement should arrive shortly."

Rumors have been circulating with increasing frequency over the past several weeks, including a January 29 report by Edward Pentin on Newsmax.com that pointed speculation in the direction of Dolan.

Rodari reports today that Il Riformista has "collected leaks" that say "Pope Benedict XVI has decided on Archbishop Timothy Dolan of Milwaukee."

Rodari also claims that although other American prelates would have preferred a stronger personality to take on the Obama Administration’s animus towards Catholics, Dolan is being tapped as a pastoral leader with a "soft touch."

Agreeing with Pentin’s earlier report, Rodari says that Archbishop of Hartford Henry Mansell, Archbishop of Atlanta Wilton Gregory, Archbishop of Newark John Myers and the Archbishop of San Juan, Puerto Rico Roberto Gonzalez Nieves, were all in the running.


*********************************************************************


PELOSI TO VISIT
THE POPE????


And there are various reports in the American blogs and other news media today that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi - who cannot get Catholic doctrine right [nor the number of Americans there are - she famously said several times on TV, despite having been corrected the first time, recently that Americans are losing 500-million jobs a month, when ther are only 350-million Americans at most - is going to Europe and will be received by the Pope at the Vatican! To which I offer a most fervent 'GOD FORBID!



[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 14/02/2009 00:43]
15/02/2009 05:24
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 3.579
Registrato il: 23/11/2005
Utente Master

Pro-Abortion Nancy Pelosi to Meet Pope - HLI Says "Excommunicate the Speaker"

By Kathleen Gilbert

WASHINGTON, D.C, February 13, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Reports have surfaced that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a self-avowed "Catholic" adamant abortion supporter, intends to head a delegation to Euope that will meet with Pope Benedict XVI.

Today the Drudge Report headlined a report by Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) on Houston's KSEV radio that Pelosi hopes to pass the federal economic stimulus bill in time for her join the group, which reportedly leaves Friday evening.

According to Il Tempo, Pelosi will arrive in Rome Sunday afternoon, her first visit to the city since becoming Speaker of the House. It has not been determined when Ms. Pelosi plans to meet the Pope.

Speaker Pelosi has drawn severe criticism from Catholic leaders for her misrepresentation of Catholic doctrine in light of her extreme pro-abortion position.

In a Meet the Press appearance last August, Pelosi justified her support for abortion despite professing Catholicism by saying that "the doctors of the Church haven't been able to make that definition" on whether life begins at conception.

"The point is, is that it shouldn't have an impact on the woman's right to choose," she continued. "This isn't about abortion on demand, it's about a careful, careful consideration of all factors and - to - that a woman has to make with her doctor and her god."

In September Pelosi's bishop, Archbishop Niederauer of San Francisco, invited her to discuss witih him the abortion issue. Pelosi stated she would "welcome the opportunity," but there is no report of Pelosi having yet scheduled a meeting with the archbishop.

Fr. Tom Euteneuer, president of Human Life International (HLI), told LifeSiteNews.com that HLI will be briefing the Vatican "so they are aware of her dismal record on life issues.

"It is our hope that the Holy Father will not grant the floundering Speaker of the House what she surely wants and expects, a quick and valuable photo-op, but will rather give her a stern lecture on contraception and abortion and let her know that her eternal salvation is in danger," said Fr. Euteneuer.

"Further, this would be the perfect opportunity to formally excommunicate the Speaker, as she has done everything a public official possibly can to declare her lack of communion with the Holy Father and the Roman Catholic Church on every conceivable issue."

16/02/2009 18:33
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.612
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
Vatican source confirms
Pelosi will meet the Pope




VATICAN CITY, Feb. 16 (AFP) – Visiting US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi will have an audience with Pope Benedict XVI during her weeklong visit to Italy, a Vatican official said Monday.

The meeting will take place on Wednesday, the official told AFP, saying it would likely occur after the pope's weekly general audience.

Pelosi, who describes herself as an "ardent" Catholic while advocating reproductive rights, will be the highest-ranking US official to see the pope since President Barack Obama took office last month.

The new Democratic administration is at odds with the Vatican over abortion, stemcell research and other bioethical issues.

Senior Vatican officials slammed Obama's rapid overturning of a ban on US government funding for family planning groups around the world that carry out or facilitate abortions.

Obama signed the executive order cancelling the eight-year-old restrictions imposed by his predecessor George W. Bush on the third full day of his presidency.

The Roman Catholic Church has also criticised the approval of US authorities for the first human trials using embryonic stemcells of a therapy to help paralysed patients regain movement.

Pelosi, who arrived in Rome on Sunday after spending the day in the Tuscan capital Florence, was to meet with Italian President Giorgio Napolitano and lunch with her Italian counterpart Gianfranco Fini on Monday.

Monday afternoon she was to lead a conference on security before meeting the press.

On Tuesday, Pelosi was to meet Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and the defence and foreign ministers, Ignazio La Russa and Franco Frattini.

The House speaker plans to spend Thursday in southern Naples.


********************************************************************


Militant pro-life Catholics in the United States will probably resent this - I don't like it the least bit myself - but she is, after all, still a baptized Christian even if her career has been a proud defiance of some basic Catholic principles.

At least, she's not getting a regularly scheduled private audience - Benedict XVI made it clear early on that he reserves that only for heads of state and heads of government (other than prelates and ambassadors, obviously) - but will see the Pope after the General Audience on Wednesday.

I doubt the Pope will have time to discuss her abhorrent style of Catholicism with her, but she will get her photo-op and she will use it as a papal seal of approval. Unfortunately, even non-Catholic pro-abortion advocates will also see it as such.

Pro-lifers shouldn't feel let down. The Pope isn't going soft on abortion, obviously. It's just that wer has its perks, unfortunately, even at the Vatican, and she's #3 in the pecking order of the USA right now.

This meeting should not stop Archbishop Niederauer from having that 'talk' with her that he promised during the campaign!

UGH! EEEWWWWW... is always my reaction when I see/hear her on TV. Quite apart from her blatant cafeteria Catholicism, she is also the most blatantly unashamedly partisan battleaxe in the arena, who nakedly says that what is good for the Democratic Party must be good for the American people. UGH! EEEWWWWW again....


********************************************************************

BUT BRITISH PM WILL GET
A REAL PRIVATE AUDIENCE




LONDON, fEB. 16 (AFP) – Prime Minister Gordon Brown will meet with Pope Benedict XVI during a visit to Italy later this week, Brown's spokesman said on Monday.

Brown's first talks with the Roman Catholic leader since he became Prime Minister in June 2007, will take place on Thursday. Brown met the Pope twice as finance minister.

"I'm in no doubt they will want to discuss in particular many of the development issues which is what they've talked about before," said the spokesman.

Brown often mentions his "moral compass" as the son of a Church of Scotland minister. His predecessor Tony Blair, who shied away from discussing religion while in power, converted to Catholicism after leaving Downing Street.

In Rome, Brown will also meet his Italian counterpart Silvio Berlusconi, focusing on the agendas of the Group of Seven nations, which Italy currently chairs, and the Group of 20 countries, currently headed by Britain.

On Wednesday Brown will meet the heads of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, Robert Zoellick and Dominique Strauss-Kahn, as part of preparations for a G20 summit in London on April 2.

At the weekend Brown will travel to Berlin for talks with fellow European Union leaders.

"We will be setting out further detail of our proposals for the issues that should be discussed and considered at the G20, and the prime minister is likely to be doing that later this week," said the spokesman.


[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 16/02/2009 18:38]
17/02/2009 22:09
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.622
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
TRACKING DOWN
MONS. WILLIAMSON'S ANTI-SEMITISM



We often assume certain things that seem to us to be so obvious as to be taken for granted. But I wanted to determine exactly what was 'known' before January 21, 2008, about Williamson's anti-Jewish views.

So today, I set out to Google Bishop Williamson with the key words 'Wiliamson', 'JEWS' 'HOLOCAUST' to track down what was available about any statements he may have made about the Jews before November 2006 (when he was interviewed by Swedish TV).

There were 1,760,000 entries, of which Google only made a first list of 335, after which it comes on with the usual note: "In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 335 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included." Well, if the search engine says so, I was not about to ask to look at all 1,760,000 entries.

And surprise, surprise! Not one of those 335 entries was written before January 21, 2009, the day Swedish TV pre-publicized its broadcast that night of the Williamson interview.

I tried to limit the search by specifying 'statements made before 2008)', which yielded 450 entries, most of them found in the larger list and still none of them dated earlier than January 2009.

So on that basis at least, it's not true that anyone - in the Vatican or elsewhere - could have checked out Williamson's anti-Semitic ideas simply by Googling him before Jan. 21.

And that is why it would have been most irresponsible indeed if the responsible people in Ecclesia Dei and the Congregation for Bishops had relied on Google alone for their information!

Very simply, they apparently failed to do 'due diligence' which any responsible person is expected to bring to any task he undertakes - in their case, gathering as much information as they could about the four bishops, including asking people who knew them and had close experience with them, like the priests of FSSP(St. Peter) and Institut du Bon Pasteur.

Now, two post-January 24, 2009, blogs did manage to dredge up dredgeable statements by Williamson about the Jews. The second one also links to a couple of full statements by Williamson posted on line several years ago and touching on the Jews in general.

What emerges from these statements is that Williamson has consciously chosen to be virulently anti-Jewish, ascribing the vilest of motives to them as found in anti-Semitic literature of the past two centuries, including the bogus and disgusting 'Protozol of the Elders of Zion'.

The first comes from the site

www.rickross.com/reference/stpius/stpius19.html


Holocaust-denying bishop lived
at Winona seminary for 15 years

By Mark Sommerhauser
Winona Daily News, Minnesota

Febuary 8, 2009


Five years before Bishop Richard Williamson denied the murder of millions on Swedish TV, he taught young men in Winona how to serve God.

Williamson made international headlines in January when he told a Swedish journalist that 6 million Jews didn't perish in the Holocaust and that the Nazi gas chambers never existed. The interview unleashed worldwide outrage and sparked a diplomatic crisis at the Vatican.

But for 15 years, Williamson made numerous similar statements in Winona, where he was rector of the St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary between 1988 and 2003.



"There was not one Jew killed in the gas chambers. It was all lies, lies, lies," he said in a speech in 1989, shortly after he became rector. "The Jews created the Holocaust so we would prostrate ourselves on our knees before them and approve of their new State of Israel ... Jews made up the Holocaust, Protestants get their orders from the devil, and the Vatican has sold its soul to liberalism."

For most of his time in Winona, Williamson kept a low profile at the seminary, secluded on Stockton Hill from 1988 to 2003, writing letters on his beliefs and occasionally making speeches.

Williamson is a bishop in the Society of St. Pius X, a sect that considers itself Roman Catholic but doesn't recognize the Vatican II reforms of the 1960s.

Williamson was excommunicated by the Vatican in 1988 because he was ordained by an archbishop not recognized by the Church. [No! Because the ordinations were not mandated by the Pope and in fact, John Paul II expressly asked Mons. Lefebvre to desist from ordaining the bishops.] But Pope Benedict XVI, attempting to thaw church relations with the society, recently rescinded the excommunication of Williamson and three other bishops.

The same day as the papal announcement, the Swedish interview aired Williamson's remarks about the Holocaust. The resulting outcry spurred the Vatican to publicly condemn Williamson's statements and, on Wednesday, demand he recant them. Williamson has not yet done so publicly.

The Pope's decision to reinstate Williamson astonished Jews worldwide, and Israel's highest religious authority severed ties with the Vatican last week [Not so! The Israelis have since cleared up on multiple occasions that the Rabbinate never did]to protest the move.

Local Jews like Maureen Feran Freedland are disturbed that Pope Benedict XVI would embrace Williamson, who has also said Jews are bent on world domination and are responsible for world wars. [And of course, lifting an excommunication as a first step to re-integrating the FSSPX is not synonymous to an 'embrace'.]

Freedland's parents survived the Holocaust in Czechoslovakia but lost dozens of family members to the Nazi death camps.

"I find this outreach to these bishops, and especially Bishop Williamson, of great concern," Freedland said Thursday from La Crosse, Wis. "I am determined that the tragedy of my own ancestors should not be denigrated." [The Pope's outreach - trying to heal an internal division within the Church - in no way denigrates the tragedy of Freedland's ancestors. He is meely putting the Christian commandment of love into practice. Too bad Freedland's Judaism apparently does not have a similar concept of love and forgiveness.]

Born a British Anglican in 1940, Williamson later embraced Catholicism and was ordained a priest of the Society of St. Pius X by
its founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, in 1976.

Williamson became rector of the society's American seminary in Connecticut in 1983, and the seminary moved in 1988 to occupy the former St. Peter Martyr Priory in Winona.

The Rev. Thomas Asher, a spokesman for Aquinas seminary, says it has ordained about 100 priests in the past 20 years, and 90 men now study there. About 200 people attend Sunday Mass at the seminary, Asher estimated.

In an e-mail to the Daily News this week, Asher said Aquinas seminary agrees with the condemnation of Williamson's remarks issued last month by Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior general of the Society of St. Pius X.

"These comments do not reflect our views nor those of the society," Asher said.

But the recent interview wasn't the first public airing of Williamson's beliefs about Jews. Aside from his 1989 comments, Williamson wrote during his time in Winona that Jews were attempting to conquer the world and that "Judeo-Masonry brought about the first two world wars."

The seminary's Web site has nothing but praise for Williamson. It touts his "first-rate intellect" and "absolute fearlessness in standing for Catholic principles."

"Bishop Williamson set out to expose the modern world's lies and perversions of the natural law; to teach seminarians how to distrust and despise (to paraphrase the Bishop) 'the glitz and glitter; the artificial, plastic world with its sentimental slush,'" the Web site reads.

Local Catholic leaders, meanwhile, say they paid scant attention to Williamson's writings and had little contact with him during his 15 years in the area.

The Rev. Donald P. Schmitz, vicar general of the Diocese of Winona, said the diocese has long been estranged from the society despite its presence in the area. [Many dioceses who have an FSSPX facility in their territory apparently have always snubbed them routinely in the way traditionalists were always treated by the 'official' churches influenced by the 'spirit of Vatican II' as parioahs - as 'the batty old aunt who should be penned in tehe attic'.]

"There wouldn't have been anyone having a lot of dialogue with (him)," Schmitz said.

Winona Bishop Bernard J. Harrington feels the Church "longs for unity" with the society, Schmitz said. But Schmitz also said the Pope's recent decision shouldn't be interpreted as an embrace of the society's beliefs or an endorsement of its practices.

"This has not changed radically our relationship with the people on Stockton Hill," Schmitz said. "We're recommended not to go there."

... [I'm omitting some paragraphs which rehash the reaction in Europe to the Pope's action.]

Many find the papal decision to embrace Williamson more difficult to dismiss than the bishop's comments, said Ellen Kennedy, who directs the Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at the University of Minnesota.

Kennedy suggested it is implausible that Pope Benedict XVI knew nothing [How convenient to be able to accuse the Pope of lying without saying so outright!] of Williamson's previous statements, though she stressed the efforts of many Catholic priests to expose historical truth about the Holocaust and promote Catholic-Jewish dialogue.

"It is imperative that this rehabilitation be retracted and that the Pope publicly condemn SSPX for its promulgation of hate," Kennedy wrote.

What is the Society of St. Pius X?

The society was founded in 1970 by French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in opposition to the Vatican II reforms instituted in the Catholic Church in the 1960s. The society includes nearly 500 priests worldwide and celebrates Mass for its followers at more than 700 locations worldwide, including the St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Winona. Priests of the society reject the liberalization and openness brought about by Vatican II and adhere to traditional hallmarks of Catholicism including the Tridentine Mass said in Latin.

How were Williamson and SSPX bishops excommunicated, then welcomed back into the Catholic Church?

In 1988, Lefebvre consecrated four SSPX priests - Williamson, Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais and Alfonso de Galarreta - as bishops, which a SSPX press release says was done to "ensure the survival of Catholic tradition."

Then, later in 1988, the Vatican declared Lefebvre's ordinations a schismatic act. Lefebvre, a bishop who assisted in the ceremony and the four newly consecrated bishops are excommunicated by the Vatican, meaning they were barred from receiving Catholic sacraments. The SSPX still maintains these excommunications were never valid.

What Williamson said while rector at Aquinas Seminary in Winona:

On Jews:

"There was not one Jew killed in the gas chambers. It was all lies, lies, lies. The Jews created the Holocaust so we would prostrate ourselves on our knees before them and approve of their new State of Israel. ... Jews made up the Holocaust, Protestants get their orders from the devil, and the Vatican has sold its soul to liberalism*." - From a speech in 1989 at Notre-Dame-de-Lourdes church in Sherbrooke, Canada.

*[He's an equal-opportunity hate-monger about everyone he dislikes, it seems. The Jews should look at what he has written and said about Pope Benedict as a heretic!]


"The Jews have come closer and closer to fulfilling their substitute-Messianic drive towards world dominion."
- From an October 2001 letter to friends and benefactors of SSPX.


"Judeo-Masonry brought about the first two World Wars."
- From a September 2002 letter

On the terrorist attacks of September 11th:

"God's punishment has surely started, but will surely not finish, with the September 11 attack on the United States."

"Politically, behind the Arab terrorists are most likely the would-be architects of the New World Order, who have long been using the United States as an instrument to achieve their control of the world."
- From an October 2001 letter

On women:

"Because of all kinds of natural reasons, almost no girl should go to any university!"

"Woman's nature is intrinsically geared to motherhood, so that in all things pertaining to motherhood she is man's superior, in all else she is his inferior."
- From a September 2001 letter

On homosexuality:

"The sin is so unnatural that Mother Church ranks it alongside murder."

"What is 'innate,' or in-born, in human nature concerning homosexuality is a violent repugnance."
-From a September 2001 letter



I will simply link to a site
jloughnan.tripod.com/bpasemit.htm
that includes the second document I referred to, because it is a rather involved story that is beyond the specific scope of my exercise.

It appears from these accounts that the second document, was compiled by a Thomas Sparks, described as a notorious British anti-Semite who has sites that are called 'Catholic' or "Catholic Forum' - so we are getting into the lunatic fringe here, beyond just Mons. Williamson, into that submerged iceberg of the Internet that I have absolutely no desire to visit.

On the other hand, Williamson may occasionally have a twinge of conscience because in a 2006 interview, he is asked directly if he was anti-Semitic. Here is the answer he gave
:

Only a fool is against Jews simply because they are Jews. There can be very few directors of Traditional Catholic seminaries, who have invited, as I once did, a Jewish rabbi to address seminarians.

On the other hand, only a Catholic who does not understand his faith is not against the enemies of Our Lord Jesus Christ. I am against Jews or Gentiles who are enemies of Our Lord Jesus Christ.


So unless any other discoveries are made abut what Williamson said and wrote about the Jews before November 2008, I believe that is the documented extent of his anti-Jewish animus. One thing 'in his favor': Fromt eh available documentation so far, he does not appear to have made a particular crusade of his anti-Semitism, as the statements have been few and far between.

Still, quite nasty, all told - as fanatics usually are.


[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 18/02/2009 00:13]
18/02/2009 00:09
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.625
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
FURTHER ON WILLIAMSON'S
'ANTI-SEMITIC' FOOTPRINTS



The Wikipedia entry on Bishop Williamson has been updated since January 21, 2009, with a number of references to Mons. Williamson's online footprints, which I don't have time to track down now, but something did catch my eye because it was fairly recent. I think it deserves posting, especially considering where it appeared! He repeats his answer quoted in the post above as to whether he is anti-Semitic.


Lefebvrists face crisis as bishop
is exposed as ‘dangerous’ anti-Semite

By Anna Arco

5 March 2008


Williamson expounds his conspiracy theories
on a YouTube video put up by his seminarian fans


A senior bishop of the Lefebvrist Society of St Pius X (SSPX) has endorsed the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a notorious anti-Semitic forgery that enjoys widespread currency in neo-Nazi circles.

Richard Williamson, one of four bishops ordained by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, told The Catholic Herald that the document - which supposedly reveals a Jewish plot to dominate the world - was authentic.

He is also on record as saying that the Jews are fighting for world domination "to prepare the Anti-Christ's throne in Jerusalem".

The SSPX has refused to condemn English-born Bishop Williamson and says it has "no policy" on the authenticity of the Protocols, a Russian Czarist forgery that has been described as "a manual in Hitler's war to exterminate the Jews".

The Society's support for Williamson - who also believes that the Americans planned 9/11 - is likely to end any chance of full reconciliation between the SSPX and Rome.

The Simon Wiesenthal Centre, a Jewish human rights organisation, said this week that it is planning to take action against Williamson.

Dr Shimon Samuels, the centre's director of international relations, described Williamson as "the Borat of the schismatic Catholic far-Right" and said that he was "a clown, but a dangerous clown".

Williamson, 67, who was excommunicated along with Archbishop Lefebvre and now runs an SSPX seminary in Argentina, is a cult figure among ultra-Right seminarians. Some of his former students have posted video tributes to him on YouTube, in which he expounds his conspiracy theories.

In 2000 Williamson endorsed the Protocols on an official SSPX website. He wrote: "God put into men's hands the Protocols of the Sages of Sion... if men want to know the truth, but few do."

The SSPX's support for Williamson comes at a time when Pope Benedict has extended an olive branch to the breakaway traditionalists in the form of a liberalisation of the pre-Vatican II traditional form of the Mass.

Bizarrely, Williamson last week implied that the Pope was an anti-Semite because of the Pontiff's changes to the 1962 version of the Good Friday Prayer.

In an interview with the Herald, Williamson said that he himself was not an anti-Semite, but didn't like "adversaries of Our Lord Jesus Christ".

He said: "If Jews are adversaries of Our Lord Jesus Christ - obviously not all of them, but those that are - then I don't like them.

"My definition of anti-Semitism is to be against every single Jew purely because he's a Jew. That's not at all my case. I once had a Jewish rabbi come and speak to seminarians. Does that sound to you like anti-Semitism?"

Although Williamson's anti-Semitism has been an open secret in the traditionalist Catholic world for years, there will be widespread dismay at the willingness of the SSPX headquarters to defend his views.

The Rev Arnaud Sélégny, the general secretary of the SSPX General House in Menzingen, Switzerland, said Bishop Williamson would not prove an "obstacle in any reconciliation with the post-Conciliar Church" and that the Society was "sure to include Mgr Williamson if there was a reconciliation" because "everyone is allowed to have his opinion in the Society".

He also said that the Society did not have a policy on the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and that "the Society has no duty or ability to make a pronouncement" on the document's authenticity.

According to Fr Sélégny, reconciliation with Rome "as it is" is unlikely but he hoped that "one day Rome would rediscover its Catholic tradition". Williamson himself suggested that reconciliation between the Church and the Society was impossible, as there were two churches - "the religion of man and the religion of God".

He told the Herald: "The Second Vatican Council is the religion of man, of man put in the place of God. Deep down what it means is that it's a new religion, dressed up to look like the Catholic religion, but it's not the Catholic religion."

The Society of St Pius X, which was founded by Archbishop Lefebvre, broke with the Church when the archbishop illicitly ordained four bishops in 1988 against Pope John Paul II's express wishes. The bishops were excommunicated.

Williamson, who was educated at Winchester and Cambridge, is a former Anglican who became a Catholic in 1971. He was ordained priest at the Lefebvrist seminary at Ecône, Switzerland, in 1976.

He later became rector of the SSPX seminary in Winona, Minnesota. Since 2003 he has been rector of the Seminary of Our Lady Co-Redemptrix in La Reja, Argentina. In a YouTube video, Williamson is filmed arguing that the Twin Towers were not brought down by aeroplanes but by "demolition charges".

He has also condemned The Sound of Music as an immoral film because it "puts friendliness and fun in the place of authority".

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion presents a Jewish plot for world domination. The text claimed to be the secret minutes from a meeting of Jewish elders conspiring to take over the world through economic manipulation, controlling the media and stoking religious conflict.

Used by Czarists and the Nazi Party, among others, the Protocols have carved out a huge new readership in the Arab Middle East, according to the US State Department's Global Anti-Semitism Report.


Sayings of Bishop Williamson

'In accordance with their false messianic vocation of Jewish world-domination, the Jews are preparing the Anti-Christ's throne in Jerusalem.'

'Can you imagine Julie Andrews in The Sound of Music staying with the Captain if the romance went out of their marriage? Would she not divorce him and grab his children to be her toys? All the elements of pornography are there...'

'This is my diagnosis of the Unabomber. You may say what you like about him as a criminal terrorist, and much of it is true... But he still has a remotely Catholic sense of how technology brutalises man. How Catholic are those technophiles who wallow at ease in their computers? Give me the Unabomber's seriousness over their shallowness, any day of the week.'

'A woman can do a good imitation of handling ideas, but then she will not be thinking properly as a woman. Did this lawyeress check her hairdo before coming into court? If she did, she is a distracted lawyer. If she did not, she is one distorted woman.'




Ooooh, he sure is a bigot in more ways than one - even if his reasoning is ludicrous! But I'm sure Pope Benedict is praying for him as much as he is praying for his 'brother bishops' in Austria and for all of who sin and err all the time. So I'll try to keep this in mind.


[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 18/02/2009 00:19]
18/02/2009 03:29
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 3.585
Registrato il: 23/11/2005
Utente Master
Maybe it's just me but this guy doesn't sound all that loyal to the pope.


Adolfo Nicolas: "We belong to the church"

AUTHOR: JAMES MARTIN, S.J.
America Magazine
POSTED AT: 2009-02-17

Adolfo Nicolas, the superior general of the Society of Jesus, recently visited the Jesuits' California Province, on the occasion of its 100th anniversary. He spoke to a wide variety of groups--9 days, 11 cities and 30 different sites--and had an extensive press conference for representatives of the Catholic media, in the Jesuit community at the University of San Francisco, on Feb. 4.

An excerpt:

"Q. How is the relationship between the Society and the Vatican different under Pope Benedict than under his predecessor?

A. I would answer almost in the same way: It is as different as the persons involved are different. The personality of Benedict XVI brings in new accents and a new style. John Paul II was a man who liked to be with other people. He almost never had a meal alone. Benedict XVI likes to eat alone because he is a thinker, and these are the times when he can think. I just hope he enjoys his food.

Their personalities are very different as are the experiences they have had. One comes from Poland, the other from Germany, and the histories they came through are different. I’m different from Kolvenbach just as he differed from his predecessor. Things keep changing.

At this moment, my relationship with Benedict XVI is quite open; it is a relationship of trust but not of political change. Many people think that is there a shift in power from Opus Dei to the Society of Jesus. I don’t think so. This pope is very discerning, and he moves on personal choice, with all the risk but also with all the limitations that this brings. This isn’t a choice for the Society of Jesus; instead, it is a choice for Father Federico Lombardi [the Vatican’s press director], whom he trusts, and for Father Luis Ladaria [the secretary of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith], whom he trusts. Therefore, we continue to have an open dialogue and to be in a relationship that is the best. We should neither be too close nor too distant. We belong to the Church. We are a part of it."

**********************************************************************

No! It's not just you! I've been saying it since almost from the day he was elected, and with every statement he makes! [The last story I posted on him, on page 23 of this thread, last November, he was saying 'liberation theology should be given time to mature' and that 'The bishops of Spain have been too reprimanding'.

I think he always speaks with a forked tongue! - like many prominent Jesuits, including Fr. Martin himself, who freely 'opine' against the Pope, starting with Cardinal Martini down to all those Jesus-denying [his divinity] theologians who have been sanctioned by the CDF.

Isn't it ironic that theologians of the 'Society of Jesus' would question his divinity? How do present-day dissenting Jesuits justify themselves to St. Ignatius? Perhaps they don't. They don't think it matters to be loyal to what their founder thought the order should be because his world is not their world today. All the more reason Cardinal Dulles really blazed like a supernova above the polluted world of his colleagues.

Which is a bigger sin and folly? Denying the Holocaust or denying the divinity of Jesus? Alas, the dictatorship of relativism permeates every aspect of the Church, but in this case, I doubt the 'relativizing Christ' advocates even see the paradox!

I certainly hope and pray that Fr. Ladaria and Fr. Lombardi are loyal to the Church and the Pope first before they are to Fr. Nicolas! And how I wish every thinking Jesuit were like Cardinal Dulles and Fr. Schall.


TERESA

[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 18/02/2009 07:23]
20/02/2009 01:31
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.651
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
Argentina orders Mons. Williamson
to leave the country within 10 days -
or be expelled by decree

Translated from



[DIM]pt[=DIM]What an irony! The country that harbored the greatest number of Nazi officials and their families after the war - including Adolf Eichmann until Israeli commandos swooped in to kidnap him - is now expelling a Holocaust denier - on immigration 'fraud'. How's that for hypocrisy. Suddenly, Argentina has a conscience about the Jews?


BUENOS AIRES, Feb. 19 - Interior Minister Florencio Randazzo has announced that the National Immigration Office has ordered Holocaust denier Mons. Richard Williamson, to "leave the country within ten days or face expulsion by decree".

The order notes that Williamson has repeatedly fabricated a reason for his residence in Argentina, declaring he is an administrative employee of the civil association La Tradicion, when his true activity is as a priest and director of the Lefebvrist Seminary in La Reja, a locality in metropolitan Buenos Aires.

On January 30, he was relieved by the FSSPX of his position as seminary director in the wake of the scandal caused by his anti-Holocaust statements.

{A concluding paragraph gives the background on the excommunications and their lifting by Pope Benedict XVI last month).


2/20/09
P.S. Additional information by an Italian newspaper's correspondent in Buenos Aires:


Argentine rabbi asked government
to declare Williamson
'persona non grata'

Translated from


A few days ago, the Grand Rabbi of Buenos Aires, Daniel Goldman, requested Argentine authorities to declare Williamson 'persona non grata'.

Goldman underscored that Williamson's statements on the Holocaust were "absolutely offensive and devastating, not only for the Jewish people, but for all mankind."

He added: "It would be important that the national authorities declare Williamson persona non grata to show that apologists of hatred like him are not welcome in our country."

The announcement made by the Interior Minister on Williamson said "episodes like this [Williamson's statements] profoundly harm Argentine society, the Jewish people and all mankind, in claiming to deny proven historical truth".

It was understood that the Interior Ministry's action has the full backing of the President of Argentina.


has the following additional information:

Official sources said that the decision, which had presidential approval, came after the Interior Minister himself received a petition from the local Jewish community.

Argentina's 300,000-strong Jewish community, the largest in South America, praised the expulsion announcement.

"The Minister took note of the protest, looked into the records [and found the immigration violation imputed to Williamson], and acted according to the law," the sources said.

The local FSSPX has not made an official statement, but representatives said, "Williamson has been a legal resident here for six ears now and has not committed any offense under Argentine law. There is no basis for his expulsion. This is an administrative artifice. If the same zeal were applied to others, there would be few foreigners left in Argentina."


*********************************************************************


I can only repeat my original reaction - about the hypocritical expediency of the Argentines, who harbored and continue to harbor thousands of Nazis who fled to their country after the defeat of Germany.

Doubtless, all of them have since become respectable Argentine citizens. But is someone like Williamson - whose anti-Holocaust views were known only to the few who had any interest in thw FSSPX before January 21 - any less worthy to be in Argentina than these ex-Nazis who actually worked in Hitler's regime?





[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 20/02/2009 17:13]
21/02/2009 15:11
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.663
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
California mother of 4 to be among
the Pope's Easter baptisms this year


By Sue Nowicki

February 20, 2009





MODESTO - Heidi Sierras won't be hiding colored eggs on Easter for her four children this year. Instead, the 29-year-old woman from nearby Ceres will be in Rome to be baptized by Pope Benedict XVI.

"It's hard to put into words. It's almost like I'm going to be baptized by Jesus himself," she said. "It's an incredible feeling."

Each year, the Pope chooses seven people representing the world's continents for the baptism service that takes place in St. Peter's Basilica on the Saturday evening before Easter Sunday.

Sierras, who worships at St. Joseph's Catholic Church in Modesto, will represent North America. About 40 people, including the Rev. Joseph Illo and Stacy Phillips, Sierras' instructor in the Catholic faith, will travel to Rome to share in her baptism and to receive Holy Communion from the pope.

"It will be fabulous," Illo said. "I've lived in Rome for two years as a seminarian, so I've been at a lot of papal Masses and served at papal Masses, but this is quite different. This is like an affirmation of my work as a priest to have one of the people that I've helped come to her faith being baptized by the one we believe is the vicar of Christ on Earth."

In the Catholic tradition, an adult who wants to become a Catholic goes through a class called Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults. It usually lasts about a year but can run for two years, depending on the parish and individual.

At the end of the class, during the Easter vigil on the evening before Easter, RCIA "graduates" receive three sacraments -- baptism, first communion and confirmation.

The rules are a little different for those raised Catholic but who missed confirmation or baptism, as well as those who were baptized in a Protestant church.

Sierras said she didn't go to church as a child. Her husband, Dan, grew up Catholic but after marriage didn't attend services regularly.

"We'd at least go on Christmas and Easter with the family," Sierras said.

About three years ago, he began going more often and she went with him. When she began asking questions about the faith, he encouraged her to sign up for RCIA to learn the answers. She did and was scheduled to be baptized at St. Joseph's last Easter.

But a Filipino woman in the church, who sometimes spends a month in Rome, knew a Filipino nun there, who knew an Italian nun, who knows the Pope.

Through that connection, the word filtered back to St. Joseph's that a North American spot was open for baptism by the Pope in 2009. The participant would have to stay in RCIA for an additional year and be sure that he or she wanted to become Catholic.

Phillips approached Sierras to find out if she was interested. She was. Letters went to and from Rome. After an initial acceptance last spring, more letters and documents were exchanged. The choice was confirmed.

Sierras watched the Easter vigil service on the Eternal Word Television Network last year.

"It's incredible," she said. "I feel like, 'Why me?' I felt undeserving. But how could I say no to that? It's an incredible opportunity."

Besides meeting the Pope, there's also the matter of flying to Italy. Sierras said she's flown twice in her life -- once to Ohio and once from Los Angeles to Modesto.

"I think I'm more nervous about that than about anything," she said.

The Sierrases have four children -- Ethan, 11; Kayla, 8; Logan, 3; and Eleanor, 1 month. The couple will take the older two children with them and leave the younger two with relatives.

"My husband is beside himself (with anticipation)," Sierras said. "My daughter was supposed to receive her first communion with the rest of her class in May. But they've arranged for her to receive her first communion this weekend so she can receive communion from the pope when we go."

Dan Sierras, who attended a Catholic church in Tracy as a youngster and teenager, said he is thrilled about the honor.

"To say I'm excited would be an understatement," he said. "It's unbelievable that she's going to be baptized by the Pope, considering there are only seven people selected in the world. I'm extremely happy because it's a true blessing, what she's going to experience.

"It is exciting to think that I'll (also) be receiving communion from the pope, but to be honest, I'm really more excited for Heidi and the sacraments that she'll be receiving."

The Bee will report on Sierras' baptism in its Easter edition. The service will be broadcast on EWTN, the Catholic cable TV network.



21/02/2009 21:42
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.669
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
CURIOSITY...

I've been checking out Bishop Williamson'a blog page every so often today, as he generally posts on a Saturday, but he has not done so as yet....



21/02/2009 22:54
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 3.599
Registrato il: 23/11/2005
Utente Master
Wouldn't be surprised...


...if Bishop Williamson were sitting on a deserted island by now, far from any internet cafes. Don't waste your time looking for his blog, Teresa. He isn't going to be writing any more entries.

Crazy though the guy is, I am beginning to feel a bit sorry for him. He is a man without a country now.


*********************************************************************

Well, he seems to be one of those crackpots who have some method in their madness. I wouldn't under-estimate his resourcefulness. Besides, his blog is now his only sure way of giving his side. Of course, he is also said to have a group of loyalists who will support him on the Web, but I only have time to check out his site...

I think he's still a British citizen, though. The UK would have to find some legal pretext other than Holocaust denial, which is not a crime in England, to keep him from 'coming home'. And as long as he has an EU passport, he theoretically can enter any EU country except Germany where the authorities could pick him up on the spot for saying what he said in Germany....Oh, and not to forget the United States, where he lived and worked for 15 years, after all.

From his muted reactions in the past month, it seems like he does not intend to 'fight back' but you never know. he's still a ticking time bomb....

TERESA





[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 21/02/2009 23:25]
23/02/2009 17:04
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 3.609
Registrato il: 23/11/2005
Utente Master
A Genial Enforcer of Rome’s Conservative Line

By MICHAEL POWELL
The New York Times
February 24, 2009

MILWAUKEE — For a few deeply unpleasant days, the Rev. David Cooper found himself in the crosshairs of the Roman Catholic hierarchy.

It was 2003, and the priest had opined to a reporter that women should be ordained. Faraway bishops rumbled about censure. Then he picked up the telephone and heard the baritone of Milwaukee’s archbishop, Timothy Michael Dolan. Father Cooper immediately offered to resign.

No, no, the archbishop replied, we just need to repair the damage. “He was very pastoral and caring,” Father Cooper recalled.

And how was it resolved? “Oh, I agreed to recant,” he said. “He effectively silenced me.”


Right photo shows Archbishop Dolan concelebrating Mass Monday morning at St. Patrick's Cathedral.

Archbishop Dolan, who Pope Benedict XVI named on Monday to lead the Archdiocese of New York, is a genial enforcer of Rome’s ever more conservative writ, a Falstaffian fellow who talks of his love of the Brewers baseball team and Miller beer, and who takes obvious joy in donning his bishop’s robes and pounding his bishop’s staff as he tromps into church. When talking with parishioners, he places his hand on their shoulders, sidles in close and, out of the corner of his mouth, cracks a joke.

Asked this month about rumors of his departure for New York, he shrugged. “I don’t think I’m on Pope Benedict’s speed dial,” he said. “I hope to be here for the rest of my life. I’ve even picked out my burial spot in the crypt — want to see it?”

On matters of doctrine, the archbishop 59, adheres to the line laid down by Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict, including firm opposition to abortion, birth control, divorce, gay marriage and any crack in the wall of priestly celibacy.

A native of St. Louis, Archbishop Dolan has scaled the Roman Catholic high cliffs, earning a Ph.D. in church history and serving in the stations sought out by the church’s high achievers: secretary to the papal nuncio, the pope’s envoy, in Washington; rector of the Pontifical North American College, a school for American seminarians in Rome; and auxiliary bishop of St. Louis, before being installed as archbishop of Milwaukee in 2002. He speaks fluent Italian.

In Milwaukee, he proved a prodigious fund-raiser, staving off the bankruptcy that seemed to beckon as the priest sexual abuse scandal, and earlier efforts at a cover-up, led to lawsuits. He closed a $3 million budget deficit last year, and started a fund-raising campaign that he says is more than halfway to its goal, with $57.5 million in pledges. He has combined shrinking parishes and reached out to young people over beers, and recruited new seminarians — the Milwaukee archdiocese expects to ordain six men this year, as opposed to a single ordination a few years ago.

He has vigorously courted the booming exurban white Catholic churches and the Hispanic congregations of the city’s south side. Such experiences could serve him well in New York, where the church also has grown more suburban and Latino. (He traveled to a Spanish class in Mexico and tries out a stray “hola!” and “como estas?” on his Hispanic parishioners.)

But the woes afflicting his 10-county archdiocese are many. The sex abuse scandal remains an open sore. The church has paid $26.5 million to settle lawsuits, and officials expect a new raft of suits in the next year. Critics say that Archbishop Dolan has not defrocked at least three priests who were found to have committed sexual abuse, and a state judge held last year that the archdiocese’s insurance company is not responsible for paying claims in cases where diocesan officials committed fraud by transferring abusive priests without notifying their new parishioners.

Attendance at Mass has declined steadily, from 40 percent of parishioners in the early 1990s to 27 percent last autumn. Sixty parishes have closed since the late 1990s and nearly three dozen parishes share priests or have lay leaders, according to The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. A few parishes remain split, sharply, over questions of birth control and divorce, and over archdiocesan attempts to promote a more traditional liturgy.

The archdiocese remains so strapped for cash that officials have put its headquarters, alongside a cobalt blue stretch of Lake Michigan, up for sale. A billboard along the lakeshore drive promises: “Development Opportunity. Approximately 44 Acres.”

Archbishop Dolan hails from American Catholicism’s now-dominant conservative wing, which has grown stronger and more assertive during the past decade. Under his predecessor, Rembert G. Weakland, the Milwaukee archdiocese had a national reputation as a liberal Catholic outpost, where debate about doctrine was vociferous and to be gloried in. Many Catholics predicted a theological war upon the arrival of the new bishop. This did not materialize.

Obedient soldier of Rome though many say he is, Archbishop Dolan remains more politician than ideologue. He has not joined the American bishops who barred Catholic politicians who favor abortion rights from taking holy communion. And, with a notable exception or two, he has declined to ferret out the liberals in his midst.

There are, the archbishop told his priests by email two years ago, speakers who are “are ‘not my cup of tea’ but who will stay ‘within the boundaries,’ and I trust your judgment. We need dialogue.”

But, he warned, there are a few — like Daniel C. Maguire, the Catholic theologian and professor at Marquette University, in Milwaukee — who favor abortion rights and are “so radically outside church teaching that his appearance at any parish would be a grave scandal.”

William J. Thorn, a journalism professor at Marquette, has spoken often with Archbishop Dolan.

“He is what you would expect of an archbishop appointed by John Paul II,” he said. “ He is with Rome on the big issues and on the little ones. But he does not do it in a dictatorial fashion.”

In personal style, it is hard to imagine a sharper contrast between this affable bishop and the distant, often diffident man he will replace in New York, Cardinal Edward M. Egan.

Cardinal Egan declined to reveal much about church finances and clashed with his priests. Archbishop Dolan gets good grades from Catholic reformers for the transparency of his archdiocese’s finances, and takes pleasure in schmoozing with his priests, asking after their elderly parents. At day’s end he might invite a few to share a glass of whiskey at his residence, a converted barn on the grounds of a lakeside seminary.

One recent Sunday, the bishop participated in the Mass at St. Benedict the Moor, a liberal church in Milwaukee. As it ended, a white-haired parishioner, Chuck Boyle, 79, rose in the pews and challenged him to rethink the church’s opposition to ordaining women, a plea which the audience, including nine former priests and their wives, met with sustained applause.

The archbishop kept his poker face and did not respond. Fifteen minutes later, he worked the food line in the church basement before easing into a steel folding chair to chat. A woman inquired if he wanted milk with his coffee.

“I’d prefer a bit of Jameson’s,” he said. “But milk will do.”

Thirty blocks to the south, at St. Adalbert Church, the past and future of the Milwaukee archdiocese are on display. A sign outside the church lists the English-language Mass: 10 a.m. Sunday. On its opposite side is the Spanish-language schedule: 8 a.m., noon and 7 p.m. And on a recent Saturday, 900 or so Mexican worshipers — wives and husbands, babies in serapes, teenagers and small children — crowded the aisles for a 5 p.m. Spanish Mass.

Few churches in the archdiocese are as packed. For this the priest, the charismatic and barrel-chested Rev. Eleazar Perez Rodriguez, credits himself, his Mexican community, and not least his middle-aged, Irish-American bishop.

Unlike most churches, St. Adalbert’s keeps its doors open from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., to suit intense devotees and irregular work schedules. The style of music and worship owes more to Oaxaca than Milwaukee. Congregants knock at Father Perez’s door day and night, and visitors often sit four deep in his antechamber.

“The church must understand and harness this community, and that hadn’t happened until Bishop Dolan came on the scene,” he said. “The bishop is kind of interesting; he doesn’t say ‘yea’ or ‘nay’, he just lets me work.”

When Archbishop Dolan arrived in Milwaukee, women and lay people occupied key positions, and he displeased some conservative supporters by leaving most in place. His chancellor, Barbara Anne Cusack, is a nationally respected canon lawyer. One of his auxiliary bishops spoke long ago in favor of ordaining woman.

The archbishop is no crusader. He speaks against abortion and the death penalty. When some parishes affiliated with a national organizing group and began pushing for a health insurance cooperative, he gave his blessing and kept his distance. Like Cardinal Egan, he seems wary that crusading could distract, not least from the fund-raising needed to keep the church afloat.

Nor is Archbishop Dolan known as a particularly sophisticated theologian; his homilies are homespun, often touching on baseball and football before turning to the importance of Christ as savior. At St. Benedict he delivered an affecting homily on the hopelessness and joy that can accompany those who care for the poor. But many priests say he lacks the lyricism and textual insight of a great homilist.

“He is no theologian,” said Professor Maguire, the Marquette theologian banned from speaking on archdiocesan property. “He is in keeping with church policy that theologians are to listen and obey. It turns theology into a form of magic, expertise without study.”

About the theatrics of his business, there is no doubt: the archbishop is a master. As he walks into church, head bowed, he peers here and there, seeking eye contact and flashing smiles. When he sings, his deep voice echoes loudest.

“I was at the vespers when he was installed at bishop,” recalled the Rev. Steven M. Avella, a history professor at Marquette. “And there’s a part where the bishop knocks on the door. Most do it timidly. Tap, tap. Not him — ‘Bang! Bang!’ ”

Father Avella laughed at the memory. “It echoed through the cathedral and let everyone know that Timothy Dolan was there.”


**************


Pope Names Milwaukee’s Dolan as New York Archbishop

By Flavia Krause-Jackson and Peter S. Green
Bloomberg.com

Feb. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Pope Benedict XVI named Milwaukee Archbishop Timothy Dolan to replace Cardinal Edward Egan as archbishop of New York, a post the late Pope John Paul II once called “the archbishop of the capital of the world.”

Dolan, who will be installed in a ceremony at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in Manhattan on April 15, will become the city’s 13th bishop and its 10th archbishop, a post held throughout history almost entirely by Irish-Americans. He served Mass this morning at the cathedral and is scheduled to hold a press conference later today.

“I pledge to you my love, my life, my heart, and I can tell you already that I love you, I need so much your prayers and support, I am so honored, humbled, and happy to serve as your pastor,” Dolan, 59, said in a statement addressed to Catholic New Yorkers this morning.

The Vatican announced the new appointment in its midday bulletin. Dolan will lead the Archdiocese of New York, which has 388 parishes and more than 650 priests, according to its Web site. It serves some 2.5 million Catholics. Egan, 76, who had been archbishop since 2000, announced plans to retire last year.

“He’s smart, he’s very personable, he’s good with people and I think the people in the pews will like him,” Father Thomas Reese, a senior fellow at Woodstock Theological Center of Georgetown University in Washington, said of Dolan.

Conservative Loyal

Dolan is known to be loyal to the conservative teachings of Pope Benedict, Reese said in an interview before the announcement. “He doesn’t want to play policeman and chase down heretics and burn them at the stake.”

“He’s not afraid to get good people around him,” said Ed Zore, the president of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance in Milwaukee, who has worked with Dolan to raise money for the diocese there.

“We have a shrinking number of parishes, a shrinking number of priests and the whole financial problem, and what he has been able to do is get good people to come and help him figure this stuff out,” said Zore.

The appointment comes as high-ranking Catholic officials seek to distance themselves from allegations that they turned a blind eye to priests who abused children.

A Tough Issue

Dolan won praise for tackling the issue openly and early on while Egan, who suspended six priests in 2002, drew criticism for not acting fast enough to address sex-abuse cases in his parishes, according to BishopaAccountability.org, a Web site set up by victims in 2003 that includes court files.

Benedict met with a small group of victims of clergy sexual abuse in Washington last April, and called for a “time of healing” in his Mass at St. Patrick’s on April 19. Relations with the 69 million American Catholics have suffered over what some called the Vatican’s reluctance to deal with the child-abuse scandal, in which more than 5,000 clergymen have been accused of molesting about 12,000 victims.

Dolan was born in St. Louis of Irish heritage. He studied theology at the Pontifical North American College in Rome and was ordained in 1976. He returned to his alma mater as rector in 1994. He was named auxiliary bishop to St. Louis in 2001 and became archbishop of Milwaukee in 2002, according to the statement issued by the New York Archdiocese.

In the history of the archdiocese, only John Dubois, a Frenchman appointed in 1826, wasn’t Irish, the Associated Press reported.

Pope John Paul II once greeted Egan’s predecessor, Cardinal John O’Connor, with the words “Welcome to the archbishop of the capital of the world,” according to George Weigel’s “Witness to Hope: The Biography of John Paul II.”


****************


Archbishop Timothy Dolan headed to New York

By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
National Catholic Reporter
Feb. 23, 2009

Legendary pitcher Mitch “Wild Thing” Williams, who threw for six teams during his pro career, recently described the difference between playing on the West Coast and the East Coast during a segment on the brand new MLB Network.

“In L.A., if the Dodgers are losing in the seventh inning, people just go home and watch the end of the game on TV,” Williams said. “In New York or Philly, if you’re losing in the seventh inning, they go home, get the TV, come back to the ballpark and throw it at you.”

In a word, Williams said, the difference is “intensity.”

In reality, it’s not just sports where things are amped up back East. Church leaders, too, play on a much bigger stage, facing greater scrutiny from the press and higher expectations of national leadership. They also preside over flocks which are often more unruly, and more vocal when they’re unhappy.

Nowhere is that high-octane atmosphere more pronounced than the Big Apple, which means that Archbishop Timothy Dolan, announced at the Vatican and in Washington Feb. 23, as the 13th archbishop of New York, is stepping into the biggest pressure-cooker in American Catholicism.

Dolan, 59, was born in St. Louis in 1950. A former rector of the North American College in Rome and a former auxiliary bishop in St. Louis, he has served as archbishop of Milwaukee since 2002.

By most accounts, Dolan inherits New York from a leader, Cardinal Edward Egan, who never quite felt at home. Egan’s nine-year tenure was marked by a series of unpopular choices, including closing schools, transferring priests and clustering parishes. While many observers say these steps were essential to put the church on a more sound fiscal and administrative footing, critics charge they were sometimes developed without adequate consultation. In their wake, whether fairly or unfairly, Egan acquired a reputation as aloof, isolated, and authoritarian.

(A 2007 episode was symbolic, in which the pastor of a Lithuanian parish in lower Manhattan slated for closing was summoned to an impromptu meeting with the cardinal, and while he was away, security guards dispatched by Egan changed the locks to the church. The New York Post’s front-page coverage was headlined, “Cardinal Sin!”)

In the end, Egan was never able to wield the “bully pulpit” of New York like his legendary predecessor Cardinal John O’Connor. In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, Egan hesitated to return from a synod of bishops in Rome and generally ceded the stage to former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, creating a vacuum in the archbishop’s public standing from which he never seemed able to recover.

In naming Dolan to the post, Pope Benedict XVI is clearly hoping to turn that around.

Dolan shares Egan’s loyalty to Rome and his generally conservative outlook, but in most other ways he’s a study in contrasts. Dolan is endlessly gregarious and self-deprecating; for example, when asked the difference between his ordination to the priesthood and his ordination as an auxiliary bishop of St. Louis 25 years later, the portly Dolan quipped, “about 50 pounds.” He’s also obviously comfortable with the press, a trait that runs in the family; his brother Bob was a popular AM radio talk show host for many years in Milwaukee.

In some ways, observers say that Dolan could be seen as a throwback to the best of pre-Vatican II American Catholicism: rock-solid in his orthodoxy, unapologetic about his loyalty to the papacy and to Rome, yet quintessentially American in his optimism, his practicality and lively sense of humor, with a clear priority on fostering good priests and good parishes.

Where Egan tended to concentrate on the nuts and bolts of internal ecclesiastical administration, Dolan also has an appetite for engaging the wider world. He’s the author of three popular books on the priesthood and Catholic spirituality, offering practical spiritual guidance that draws on eclectic sources such as self-help guru Steven Covey, the late President Ronald Reagan, and the late Belgian Cardinal Désiré Mercier. By reputation, Dolan is also a prelate who prefers to be out in the field rather than behind a desk, spending time in parishes, rectories, seminaries and hospitals.

On a Myers-Briggs test, Dolan’s scores for “extrovert,” according to most observers, would be off the chart.

Born in St. Louis, Missouri, in 1950, Dolan obtained a doctorate in American church history from the Catholic University of America in the early 1980s. (His dissertation focused on Archbishop Edwin O’Hara, a founder of the Catholic Biblical Association.) He was a parish priest in St. Louis from 1983-87, but it seemed obvious even then that Dolan was marked for higher office; in 1987, that was confirmed when he was named a secretary to the papal nuncio, or ambassador, in Washington.

After a brief stint at Kenrick-Glennon Seminary in the early 1990s, he went to Rome to serve as rector of the North American College, the American seminary in Rome. Students who knew Dolan in those days say he was a no-nonsense leader, but that his good cheer leavened what can sometimes be a stuffy and formal environment.

“He ran a happy house,” said Fr. Raymond de Souza, a former seminarian at the NAC who today is a pastor and well-known columnist in Canada.

In June 2001, Dolan was named an auxiliary bishop in St. Louis, where then-Archbishop Justin Rigali, today the cardinal of Philadelphia, gave him special responsibility for vocations. Dolan’s connection with Rigali would prove decisive for his rapid rise, as Rigali is a former official in the Vatican’s Secretary of State and today sits on the Congregation for Bishops, the all-important body in Rome that vets episcopal nominations.

In August 2002, Dolan succeeded Archbishop Rembert Weakland in Milwaukee. The assignment was seen as a test of Dolan’s mettle, given that as he arrived, the archdiocese was in the grip of a crisis triggered by revelations that Weakland had secretly used $450,000 in church money to reach a settlement with a man who accused him of sexual abuse. (Weakland acknowledged a sexual relationship, but denied there had been abuse.) Moreover, Weakland was known as a leader of the liberal wing of American Catholicism, while Dolan leans more to the right. Some in Milwaukee worried that Dolan had been sent to bring the archdiocese to heel.

Publicly, Dolan was a quick hit, using humor to defuse tensions. During his installation Mass, for example, he noted that eight cardinals were in attendance, and quipped: “One more and we could field a baseball team … which, considering how the Brewers are playing, might not be such a bad idea.” (The Brewers finished 56-106 in 2002, last in the National League Central.)

On matters of substance, Dolan pledged greater financial accountability, and followed through by hiring an independent auditing firm and mailing their results to every Catholic household in the 10-county archdiocese. He held an emotional series of meetings with victims, and set up an independent mediation process to settle claims that reduced the role of lawyers. That process played to mixed reviews, as some victims’ groups felt Dolan was stacking the deck against people with legitimate grievances.

Dolan indeed struck a more conservative tone than Weakland – for instance, he insisted on following the church’s rules on liturgy more closely – but on most hot-button questions he never veered far from the center. For example, Dolan expressed admiration for bishops such as Raymond Burke who threatened to deny communion to pro-choice politicians, but never took that step himself. When the Vatican issued a document barring gays from the priesthood in 2005, Dolan adopted what would come to be seen as the “moderate” reading – that men with same-sex inclinations could be ordained as long as they were capable of celibacy and not part of a “gay subculture.”

“It’s not a no-gays policy,” Dolan said on CNN.

Though Dolan was a PR success, things did not get off to an auspicious start with his priests. During their first meeting, Dolan delivered a spiritual reflection on what it means for a priest to stand in persona Christi, “in the place of Christ.” Some priests felt Dolan was being pietistic, and peppered him with more practical questions such as his plans for salaries and whether he planned to reverse Weakland’s policy allowing priests to live in private apartments rather than rectories. Dolan, in turn, felt that some of the priests had lost their spiritual “fire in the belly,” and seemed consumed by secondary matters.

Over time, Dolan earned grudging credit for being a capable manager, a good listener, and having a strong pastoral streak, even if some of his theological convictions remain a tough sell for priests more accustomed to Weakland’s almost 25-year tenure.

Among his brother bishops, Dolan likewise draws high marks as a person and a public figure, but some locate him a bit to the right of the conference’s mainstream. In November 2007, Dolan lost a race to become vice-president of the conference to Bishop Gerald Kicanas of Tucson, a moderate in the tradition of the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago, by a margin of 55-45 percent.

On the other hand, Dolan is by no means seen as an ideologue. He serves as the chair of Catholic Relief Services, the major overseas relief agency of the U.S. church, and when CRS came under fire in 2008 for allegedly promoting condoms as part of anti-AIDS efforts, Dolan came to its defense. He issued a letter to the effect that CRS materials were “fully in keeping” with church teaching. Dolan has also taken an interest in Jewish/Catholic relations, traveling to Auschwitz and playing a behind-the-scenes role during moments of crisis in reaching out to Jewish leaders.

In the run-up to his appointment, the major drawback cited in terms of Dolan’s candidacy for New York is that he has no ties to the area. That was true of Egan as well, and perceptions that Egan had been imposed on New York by the late Pope John Paul II – against O’Connor’s wishes – created resentment that proved hard to shake. Moreover, some say that New York is so big and complex that an archbishop who doesn’t already know the score starts with a major handicap.

“He’ll spend his first ten years just trying to figure out who he can trust,” a fellow archbishop said, speaking on background.

On the other hand, some say that being an outsider could actually work in Dolan’s favor, since he won’t bring any baggage to the job as a result of being identified with one party or the other on the local scene. Moreover, Dolan does have one bit of biography that makes him a good fit: Like every previous archbishop of New York save one, he’s of Irish descent.

In any event, most people seem to believe that Dolan’s sunny, outgoing persona will strike New York as a breath of fresh air.

Fr. David O’Connell, president of the Catholic University of America, put it this way: “If the part of archbishop of New York could ever be scripted,” O’Connell said, “Dolan would really be cast in that role.”


*********************************************************************

It's great to have apparent unanimity in the media in praise of a high-ranking conservative Catholic prelate for a change!

And I am happy and proud to have someone like Archbishop Dolan as my 'hometown' bishop, even as I am very sorry Cardinal Egan received a very one-sided portrayal in the MSM.

However, what was that about Mons. Dolan defending condoms as part of Catholic relief services????? I hope the full statement he made is available online. As quoted by AlLen, it disturbs me a lot....

TERESA



[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 24/02/2009 02:01]
24/02/2009 01:44
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.698
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
ON THE OTHER HAND,
HERE'S A TOUGH-TALKING
NORTHEAST BISHOP....




Bishop of Scranton bars
pro-abortion officials
from St. Patrick’s Day Masses






SCRANTON, Pennsylvania, Feb 20, 2009 (CNA) - Explaining that he is determined to “prevent scandal,” Bishop of Scranton Joseph Martino has said that he will cancel Masses for St. Patrick’s Day or for the St. Patrick’s Day Parade if any pro-abortion officials are honored at the holiday events.

The bishop said that scandal could arise if the Catholic Church is seen to be involved in honoring such officials.

John M. Dougherty, the Auxiliary Bishop of Scranton, explained Bishop Martino’s views in a Feb. 6 letter to John Keeler, President of the Friendly Sons of Saint Patrick of Lackawanna County.

Saying that St. Peter’s Cathedral plays “no small role” in the local observance of St. Patrick’s Day, Bishop Dougherty noted that local celebrations often honor elected public officials. This honoring takes place when they are given parade positions or dais opportunities.

“While some of the officials have merited the pride our local people take in them, others have positions and voting records that have contributed to the daily killing of the unborn by abortion,” Bishop Dougherty wrote.

Saying Bishop Martino “understands and blesses” the ethnic pride of men and women in the diocese, he is also “determined to prevent scandal.”

This scandal would take place “when or if” the Friendly Sons of Saint Patrick, the Saint Patrick’s Parade Association of Lackawanna County or the Society of Irish Women should honor such officials and the Catholic Church is seen to be involved.

If the prevention of scandal requires it, Bishop Dougherty wrote, Bishop Martino may close St. Peter’s Cathedral or any Catholic church in the diocese for Masses which include the honoring of pro-abortion elected officials.

“It is certainly the Bishop’s hope that judicious choices of elected public officials to be honored by your organization will make unnecessary any such action on his part. He asks, however, that I communicate with you now so as to avoid any surprise should he be required to take action in this most serious matter,” Bishop Dougherty’s letter said before concluding with a blessing.

According to WNEP-TV, parade organizers say they’ve never honored pro-abortion politicians in their parade and don’t plan to start.

"We met as a committee and formulated our opinion that we support the bishop's position. We don't feel it should impact the parade or its Mass," Mike Harrity of the St. Patrick’s Parade association said.

Scranton resident Corey Eagen told WNEP-TV he didn’t think the bishop should break with tradition “just because he’s not happy with the way other people act.”

Robert Malos, another Scranton resident, had kind words for Bishop Martino’s action, saying:

“Maybe some people would say 'extreme' but he's sticking to his guns and in a way, I kind of admire him for that. I like a guy who says something and sticks to it. I have no problem with that at all.”

*********************************************************************

Bishop Martino has made news in the past few months since he announced last September that he would not give Communion to then Senator Joseph Biden, a native of Scranton (though he had been living in Delaware for a long time), because of his openly pro-abortion views.

Since then, he has not missed an occasion to reiterate his belief that Catholic pro=-boriton politicians do 'cause scandal' for the faithful when they present themselves for Communion.

It seems so far most of his flock agree with him.


[Modificato da TERESA BENEDETTA 24/02/2009 01:49]
24/02/2009 15:43
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 16.706
Registrato il: 28/08/2005
Utente Gold
THE DOLAN WATCH

As I was not particularly paying attention the last time an Archbishop was named for New York, I must admit the great media stir over the new Archbishop sort of caught me by surprise.



New leader meets archdiocese he calls
a 'snapshot' of the universal Church

By Beth Griffin




NEW YORK, Feb. 23 (CNS) -- Calling the diverse New York Archdiocese "a real icon, a snapshot of the church universal, of the church in the United States," Archbishop Timothy M. Dolan pledged his life, his heart and his soul to the people of the archdiocese Monday.

Pope Benedict XVI named Archbishop Dolan, head of the Milwaukee Archdiocese since 2002, to succeed the retiring Cardinal Edward M. Egan. He is to be installed as New York archbishop April 15.



At a press conference in the New York Catholic Center, Archbishop Dolan said, "I can tell you already that I love you. I need so much your prayers and support. I am so honored, humbled and happy at the prospect of serving as your pastor."

As pastor, he said he has "a sacred mandate to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ and how the church transmits his mystery, his ministry and his invitation."

He said the message is intended to serve everybody. "Nothing foreign is alien to us. That's part of the Catholic chemistry. We're not just sacristy, not just sanctuary, not just Sunday people.

"The church through the ages has been a hyperkinetic partner of the arts, literature, health care and immigrants," he added. "Look to us to continue that partnership."

Archbishop Dolan promised to do whatever he could to affirm the priests of the archdiocese. "The vitality of this great archdiocese is in its parishes," he said. "The priests are on the front lines. I am their servant. You can count on me to help them.

"I look forward to being with the priests," he added. "That's not a chore; that's a choice."

Archbishop Dolan said in his role as pastor he would engage, rather than confront, public officials on the importance of respecting the civil rights of the most vulnerable, especially the unborn.

"I'd like to think it wouldn't be limited to politicians," he said. "I'd hold everybody accountable to the teachings of natural law and the church I'm proud to represent."

Archbishop Dolan said he based his leadership style on his mother's advice to "be yourself." He said bishops and priests crave silence and have a deep, quiet center. "I hope from that comes a sense of joy and hope," he added.

Archbishop Dolan said the Latino contribution of vitality and celebratory, joyful faith as well as a sense of pride in family is a "tonic to the Catholic Church in the United States." He said the church historically is the most successful, effective agency that welcomes immigrants and helps them become productive members of society and the New York Archdiocese has been a leader within the church.

"What Lady Liberty is socially, holy mother church has been spiritually when it comes to our beloved immigrants," he said.

He said he wants to continue to improve his Spanish, which he said now allows him to celebrate Mass and the sacraments and preach "a very simple homily."

Archbishop Dolan said bishops have to live in the real world and face the challenges of some people leaving the church and others not participating in the sacraments. "We'd be less than honest if we didn't say we've got problems," he said, but there have been struggles in the church since the days of the Acts of the Apostles.

Archbishop Dolan said he and Cardinal Egan had spoken on the telephone to representatives of other religious groups in New York. He said he embraced ecumenical and interreligious dialogue and might be described as "energetic" in doing so in Milwaukee.

He said he is involved in Catholic-Jewish dialogue on behalf of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and finds it "intensely rewarding and enriching."

Archbishop Dolan said Catholic schools in New York are "in great shape now" but are a constant concern. Speaking as a church historian, he said keeping schools on a firm financial foundation has been a challenge from the beginning.

"There's never been an easy time," he said. "That's part of our grit. We have to struggle for every dime and muster every ounce of strength to keep them strong. Count on me to be a front-line cheerleader for Catholic schools."

Archbishop Dolan said his heroes included Jesus Christ, Pope John Paul II and his parents.

He sidestepped a question about proposed state legislation that would allow victims of clergy sexual abuse to file civil suits against the archdiocese. "That's an area of such delicacy and precision that I'll have to study it hard," he said.

Cardinal Egan said Archbishop Dolan "has come here to deepen our faith, to lead us in prayer and guide us in the works of justice, compassion and peace. The Holy Father has chosen well."

The cardinal said although some people had expected him to get involved in nonreligious, political issues, he chose to focus his efforts on parishes, charities, schools and health care and "the faith being announced."

He said his "greatest sadness" was not having "done better with vocations." He said the archdiocese was only now seeing a spurt in vocations, which might be attributed to a number of factors including the 2008 visit of Pope Benedict XVI to New York.

Cardinal Egan is the first archbishop of New York to retire. He said he would live in one of the parishes of the archdiocese and be available to his successor to celebrate Masses and officiate at funerals and confirmations.

"You're hired," Archbishop Dolan said. "I'm glad you'll be here. I need you."

Asked if his Irish heritage was a factor in his appointment to a see that has traditionally been led by an Irishman, Archbishop Dolan quipped, "It's a sign of the Holy Father's infallibility."

Cardinal Egan introduced Archbishop Dolan at the 8 a.m. Mass at St. Patrick's, which they concelebrated. After Mass, they visited the crypt under the main altar where their predecessors are entombed.

After the press conference, Cardinal Egan and Archbishop Dolan addressed the staff of the New York Catholic Center at St. John the Evangelist Church, receiving a standing ovation.



The new guy in Yonkers:
23 Observations from evening prayers
at St. Joseph’s Seminary

by Gary Stern

Westchester News Journal
February 23, 2009




1. Archbishop Timothy Dolan and Cardinal Egan, upon pulling up in front of the seminary, were greeted by Bishop Gerald Walsh — the rector (center) — and Yonkers Mayor Phil Amicone.

Also on hand was the Rev. Luke Sweeney (left), an Irvington native and vocations director for the Archdiocese of New York. Sweeney was a seminarian at the North American College in Rome when Dolan was rector there.

3. When Dolan entered the main lobby and received a long ovation from seminarians, faculty and guests, he looked like he had just walked into a surprise party—grinning ear to ear. I mean, this was after a full day of meetings and congratulatory phone calls.

4. Speaking of which, Dolan said that he got a phone call from President Obama just before leaving NYC for Yonkers. “I said ‘Thank you, Mr. President. I need those prayers.’ He said, ‘I need your prayers, too.’ ” He also got calls from Mike Bloomberg, Gov. Paterson and others.

5. This was Dolan’s first visit to Dunwoodie. During the vespers service, he talked about the seminary’s worldwide reputation.

6. Dolan said he’s never spent more than a couple of days in New York.

7. During vespers, Egan expanded on his role in Dolan’s rise. Egan explained that when he was chairman of the North American College, he sought out the best possible rector. He heard about Dolan and went to St. Louis to recruit him.

8. In the lobby, Egan and Dolan talked about the pressing need for more seminarians. Egan suggested that each current seminarian recruit four more. Dolan responded: “If you get more than four, I’ll ordain you early.” More applause…

9. Dolan said he will be spending most of the next month in Milwaukee, where he is still in charge. Ash Wednesday is, after all, Wednesday, and there is much for an archbishop to do.

10. The choir loft at the seminary was filled with more than two dozen reporters and cameramen. Several reporters were doing live reports for their 5 p.m. broadcasts while the service was going on. Not too much interruption, though.

11. Addressing the seminarians, Dolan said that after a long, packed day of excitement, the one thing that stood out from the rest was…Mass. “That is the most important thing that I ever do,” he said.

12. Tomorrow, Dolan may take part in a Milwaukee tradition for “Fat Tuesday:” eating jelly rolls made of fat and grease. He hopes his doctor won’t object.

13. Although it’s been announced that he will be installed on April 15, Dolan will actually take “canonical possession” of the archdiocese at a special service at St. Patrick’s on April 14. On the 15th, he will be installed and celebrate Mass.

14. One more: Dolan was off to the cafeteria for dinner with the seminarians. Penne vodka and chicken marsala.

And there you go.


24/02/2009 19:07
 
Email
 
Scheda Utente
 
Modifica
 
Cancella
 
Quota
OFFLINE
Post: 3.613
Registrato il: 23/11/2005
Utente Master

Adios! But look out, Mary and Wulfrune. He's heading your way. The British press will be thrilled.


Holocaust-Denying Bishop Departs Argentina Waving Fist at TV

By Bill Faries

Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Richard Williamson, a Roman Catholic bishop who denied the Holocaust and was reinstated to the church last month by Pope Benedict XVI, left Argentina today under threat of expulsion.

Williamson, wearing a black baseball cap and sunglasses, stopped to wave his fist in the face of a reporter for the Todo Noticias news channel at Buenos Aires’s international airport. The reporter was then held back by two unidentified men accompanying the cleric.

The U.K.-born Williamson, 68, who lived near the Argentine capital, was on a flight to London that departed shortly after 2 p.m. local time, the Interior Ministry said.

The pope’s Jan. 24 decision to lift the excommunication of Williamson and three other traditionalist priests who broke with the church in the 1980s prompted criticism from Jewish groups and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The pope has called for Williamson to retract the remarks before he can be officially reinstated.

In a Swedish television interview last month, Williamson said that the “historical evidence is hugely against 6 million Jews having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy by Adolf Hitler.”

Argentine Interior Minister Florencio Randazzo said Feb. 19 that those comments “deeply hurt Argentine society, the Jewish people and humanity.” He said Williamson misled immigration authorities about his work in the South American country and had 10 days to leave or be forcibly expelled.

Nuova Discussione
Rispondi
Cerca nel forum
Tag cloud   [vedi tutti]

Feed | Forum | Bacheca | Album | Utenti | Cerca | Login | Registrati | Amministra
Crea forum gratis, gestisci la tua comunità! Iscriviti a FreeForumZone
FreeForumZone [v.6.1] - Leggendo la pagina si accettano regolamento e privacy
Tutti gli orari sono GMT+01:00. Adesso sono le 05:30. Versione: Stampabile | Mobile
Copyright © 2000-2024 FFZ srl - www.freeforumzone.com