NEWS ABOUT THE CHURCH & THE VATICAN

Versione Completa   Stampa   Cerca   Utenti   Iscriviti     Condividi : FacebookTwitter
Pagine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ..., 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, [60], 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, ..., 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105
TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 21 novembre 2007 17:06
AN OVERVIEW OF CATHOLIC SCHOOLS


School is a privileged field
of mission for the Church



Vatican City, Nov. 21 (AsiaNews) – The truly vast area of education involves more than a billion school-age children as well as 58 million teachers plus support staff.

More than 250,000 Catholic schools with 42 million students are in that network. In the Asian continent alone, some ten million young people are educated in Catholic schools, which constitute a privileged area of action for the Catholic Church.

"Educating Together in Catholic Schools. A Shared Mission between Consecrated Persons and the Lay Faithful", a paper published by the Congregation for Catholic Education (for Seminaries and Institutes of Study), confirms it.

“The lack of interest in the fundamental truths of human life as well as individualism, moral relativism and utilitarianism” but also the growing “gap between rich and poor countries” and growing population movements and the problems related to the stability of the family” are typical phenomena of our society.

In this context, the aforementioned paper says that it “becomes particularly urgent to offer young people an educational path” that “is not reduced to an individualistic and instrumental use of a service for the purpose of getting a degree.” Instead it should provide an opportunity “to meet a true educational community, built upon the basis of shared values and goals.”

Catholic schools represent a “privileged place” to shape minds and show a model of life to be followed in order “to build a world founded on dialogue.” And at the same time it is “an educational community in which ecclesial and missionary communion can deeply mature and grow.”

Speaking about the documnt at a news confrence yesterday, Cardinal Zenon Grocholewski, prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education, stressed that globalisation is today’s “most significant phenomenon,” not “only in economic terms but also cultural, political and educational. It favours meeting and exchange between peoples, but can also produce a dangerous cultural homogenisation, a sort of cultural colonialism.”

In addition to this kind of problems, modern schooling has experienced “a loss in terms of meaning as to what it is supposed to be because of a loss of values, especially those that support life, namely the family, work, and moral choices. Thus education suffers from the ills that afflict our society: widespread subjectivism, moral relativism and nihilism.”

Faced with all this, argues the document, “the educational experience of Catholic schooling constitutes a formidable barrier against the influence of a widespread mentality that leads many, especially among the young, to consider life as a set of thrills to enjoy rather than something to accomplish. Furthermore, it contributes to forming strong personalities that can resist a debilitating relativism whilst living coherently” with one’s faith.

Lebanon, India, Thailand, Nepal and the Holy Land are but a few of the places on the Asian continent that Mgr Angelo Vincenzo Zani, under-secretary of the Congregation for Catholic Education, cites as examples.

“Catholic schools,” he said, “operate in all geographical areas, including those in which religious liberty does not exist or that are socially and economically disadvantaged.” And they have “an amazing capacity to respond to emergencies and educational needs despite great difficulties at times.” Not to mention the fact they are open to everyone.

In Lebanon, for example, the main goal of Catholic schooling is to bring young people together in the pursuit of dialogue and co-operation between Muslims and Catholics.” Here “out of 210,000 Catholic school students from the country’s 18 religious denominations, Catholics are 63 per cent, 12.6 per cent are from other Christian groups, and 24 per cent are non-Christian, mostly Muslim. In some areas of the country, non Catholics represent 99 per cent of the total student population.”

In the Holy Land (Israel, Palestinian Territories and Jordan), “out of a [combined] population of 11 million Christians are only 280,000; of these 140,000 are Catholic. Christians represent 55 per cent of the Catholic school population compared to 45 per cent who are non Christians, mostly Muslims, but also a few Jews.”

Mgr Zani illustrates the situation by citing two examples. “In El Mutran Nazareth there is St Joseph School, home to about 1,200 Christian and Muslim students. The basis of its educational project is peace, learning to live together and accepting [one another’s] differences.” In Jerusalem we find the Schmidt’s Girls College, founded in 1886 and open to girls and young women, from the ages of 4 to 19, two thirds of which are Muslim.

Similarly, in Nepal, “where the majority of the population is Hindu, Catholics are but a mere 6,000 in a population of 23 million.” Yet in “2004 the king awarded a prize to two missionaries for their work in the area of education, namely the principal at St Mary’s School and the founder of St Xavier College, the only Catholic college in Nepal.”

In India “there are seven million students enrolled in Catholic schools. The proportion of Catholics is only 22.7 per cent and 5.6 per cent are from other Christian denominations; 53 per cent are Hindu, 8.6 per cent Muslim and 10.1 per cent from other groups. About 45.1 per cent of the schools are run by the dioceses and the remainder by religious congregations.”

For his part, Cardinal Grocholewski mentioned that he personally had some experiences of this type; for instance, he was in Thailand where “Catholics numbers 297,000, less than 0.5 per cent of the population, and yet where students attending Catholic schools are almost 400,000.”

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 21 novembre 2007 17:18
Holy See Urges U.N.
to Coordinate Disaster Response



NEW YORK, NOV. 20, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The Holy See is encouraging the United Nations to help coordinate assistance programs that offer relief after natural or man-made disasters, like the cyclone that recently pounded Bangladesh.

Archbishop Celestino Migliore, permanent observer of the Holy See to the United Nations, made this appeal Monday when he addressed the U.N. General Assembly on the topic of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance.

The archbishop first noted the devastation caused by conflicts and war, noting that last year, the high number of natural disasters was accompanied by "many and extremely costly man-made ones."

"Armed conflicts have devastated societies in many places, taken lives, ruined economies, set back development and frustrated efforts to restore peace," he said. "Given the terrible consequences of armed conflicts, we must once again recall that in the most unfortunate case of war, all parties involved must comply fully with the rules and principles of international law and international humanitarian law related to the protection of humanitarian personnel, such as allowing full unimpeded access by humanitarian personnel to all people in need of assistance."


Archbishop Migliore lauded the efforts made by governments to prepare for natural disasters, and thus reduce the negative effects they cause.

"By increasing the knowledge and capacity of local actors to respond effectively to emergency situations, countries can reduce the long-term cost and consequences of a disaster," the prelate said. "Local civic and faith-based organizations are highly effective in this regard, and thus must be fully engaged, supported and, when necessary, duly protected."

Archbishop Migliore urged the United Nations to use its "position within the international community" to coordinate humanitarian responses to disasters.

"For this response to be effective," he explained, "this organization needs the full cooperation of the states directly concerned, especially in ensuring that the latter fully comply with their obligations under international law and international humanitarian law, and that they fulfill their responsibility to protect their own people."

The Holy See representative continued: "Moreover, as humanitarian agencies grow in number and variety, the United Nations could enhance collaboration among them and harness their complementary capacities, while respecting their differences and the specific aims and principles of each organization.

"Long-term and sustainable post-disaster recovery continues to be a challenge and a necessity. While individual governments are responsible for developing long-term recovery strategies, collaboration with local agencies is important, in particular with those that have acquired concrete knowledge of the situation and have long-term deployment of resources in the region. This could cushion the unintended harmful effects, especially on the more vulnerable sectors of society, of the transition from emergency humanitarian assistance to the recovery phase."

Finally, the prelate called for sustained support from the international community in ensuring long-term recovering from disasters.

"An outpouring of goodwill and international solidarity most often follow live reports and images of humanitarian disasters, but as attention and resources move to other priorities, it quickly weakens or even disappears," he lamented.

"This could be very costly, especially in post-conflict situations in which the probability of a relapse to violence is very high, or in places where a truly catastrophic natural disaster wiped out the economic base of entire communities," the archbishop said.

"A steady commitment is necessary if a sustainable and long-term recovery system of peoples and regions affected is to be achieved. We therefore welcome initiatives to highlight the often forgotten humanitarian situations and under-funded humanitarian efforts throughout the world."



TERESA BENEDETTA
00giovedì 22 novembre 2007 05:22
CARDINAL MARTINI SPEAKS ABOUT THE 'WORD OF GOD'

Here is a translation of an interview by the Italian service of Vatican Radio with Cardinal Martini today:


Recently, the Guidelines for the Bishops Synod of 2009 were published on the theme of the Word of God.

In the general audience of November 14, the Pope cited St. Jerome in exhorting the faithful to read the Bible often because "not to know Sacred Scrioture is not to know Christ'.

But what could be proposed today to 'reinforce', as the guidelines say, the practice of encounter with the Word of God as a life resource?

Fabio Colagrande asked this in a telephone interview with Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini who is at the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Jerusalem.

Cardinal Martini: The Pope quoted St. Jerome, and it was beautiful to to hear him insist on this, reading the Scriptures, as he has done on other occasions.

I think that what we must reinforce above all is what the Pope calls lectio divina, which means, reading Scripture as a source of prayer. Whether individually, or in groups. I think that encouraging and strengthening this practice can bring a great love for the Word of God and lead people to discover its treasures.


Eminence, the Guidelines speak about the risks in an arbitrary and reductive interpretation of the Word, the risks from an ideological reading, or even just simple reading without the support of faith. What do you think are the most serious risks today about interpreting the Word of God?

Those risks were already listed in the document of the Biblical Commission in 1998, which cites, above all, what we could call 'contextual approaches' - for instance, the liberationist approach which would concentrate on the narrative and prophetic texts that illumine a situation of oppression, but this means ignoring other texts and therefore restricting the Bibilical message.

Then there is the so-called feminist approach, which has its value, certainly, but - as the Biblical Commission pointed out - to the degree that such an interpretation is based on a partisan bias, then the risk is to interpret the texts tendentiously.

Then, there's the 'fundamentalist' reading, which is perhaps the most serious danger, because it refuses to consider the historic character of Biblical revelation, and therefore, does not recognize the Incarnation. Such fundamentalism insists unduly on the unerring detail of Biblical texts, and doe not take into account the growth of the evangelical tradition when reading the Gospels.

These are all readings that have been, shall we say, for the most part, overcome, dismissed, but they will always be a peril for the People of God.


In terms of interpretation, what is the task of the Magisterium in the service of the Word of God?

The Magisterium has a very important task, which has been well defined by Vatican-II in Dei Verbum. It says that the office of interrpreting the Word of God authentically is entrusted only to the living Magisterium of the Church, but it adds: this Magisterium shall not be above the Word of God, but serve it by teaching only what has been transmitted. Therefore, the Magisterium is at the service of the Word for the authentic interpretation of this Word.


Benedict XVI insists that alongside historico-critical exegesis thre should be a true introduction to living Scripture as the actual Word of God. How can this be brought about?

This insistence is very important, precisely because one cannot be limited to exterior aspects. The realization is best brought about, as I mentioned earlier, in what has come to be called lectio divina, which is an approach to Scriptural text as something in which God speaks to me or speaks about me and invites me to pray, to answer him.

So it is a living approach, not ecclesiastical or abstract. It is a living approach that I myself have taken together with many young people, and I have seen so many of them respond with great intensity to such an interpellation of Scripture.


On the basis of your long experience, do you think that we run the risk today of evangelizing or of catechizing in a way that is detached from the Word?

Of course, there is always some risk of this when one attempts an evangelization that is purely intellectual and abstract, therefore it really does not take count of the Word. So it is very important in Evangelization to read the Gospels.


Finally, addressing our listeners, Cardinal Martini, how would you invite them to turn to the word of God?

I woudl ask them to start today and read one page of the Gospel of Mark, another page tomorrow, and so on, and each time, take a few minutes to 'pray over' what you have read. I think that would be the best introduction tio Scripture.



benefan
00venerdì 23 novembre 2007 03:02

For the pope's new princes of the Church, red is the cardinal rule

The Associated Press
Thursday, November 22, 2007

VATICAN CITY: "When in doubt wear red" is a well-known fashion tip.

But to a cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church, there's never much hesitation. Red is the color of his uniform, and the hue symbolizes a commitment to die for his church if necessary.

In a formal ceremony on Saturday, 23 new "princes of the Church" will don the crimson outfits when Pope Benedict XVI brings them into the elite circle of his closest advisers. They join a group which, when the time comes, will elect his successor from within their own ranks.

The expression "getting a red hat" is synonymous with being named a cardinal. During the ceremony, the pope places on each man's head the three-cornered red "biretta." As the new cardinals bow their heads to receive the hat, the pope reminds them that red signifies their willingness to act "with fortitude, even to the point of spilling your blood for the increase of the Christian faith."

Once the almost exclusive domain of the Gammarelli family, papal tailors for the past 200 years, high-end clerical tailoring is now more spread out, with some cardinals opting to have their outfits made back home.

Archbishop Daniel DiNardo, who on Saturday becomes Texas's first cardinal, is sticking with the Gammarellis, long-time friends from his years in Rome before becoming archbishop of Houston.

"It's all very exciting," said 23-year old Stefano Gammarelli, standing behind the timeworn oak table on which the tailors exhibit the sumptuous fabrics used for their strictly hand-made garments.

Stefano is at his second elevation ceremony, and says there is nothing like the buzz of last-minute fittings and trimmings. The family keeps sizes and shapes of their clients on a computer, which facilitates fittings, as most of their customers do not live in the Eternal City.

Dress for the ceremony is the same as for any formal occasion: rigorously red from head to toe, from crimson skull cap to scarlet socks.

The basic ceremonial garment is a red cassock with red silk buttons, girthed with a red silk moire sash and worn with a matching red short cape known as a 'mozetta.' A white lace or linen surplice, called a rochet, completes the outfit. Accessories include a red and gold braided cord to hold the pectoral cross, and a gold ring which the newly named cardinals will receive during a special Mass Sunday.

"We haven't gotten much sleep lately," said Francesco Cattaneo, whose family runs a modern ecclesiastical shop near St. Peter's Square. They, too, have been commissioned to outfit several of the new princes of the church, and last minute touches were still being put on the outfits, especially for out-of-town candidates.

A cardinal's everyday wardrobe includes a black cassock trimmed in red, worn with a red sash and a red skull cap. According to Cattaneo, African cardinals, such as Archbishop John Njue, the newly named cardinal of Nairobi, Kenya, often order a special everyday version in heat repellent, red-trimmed white, to shield them from the soaring temperatures in their countries.

The average cost of a complete cardinals outfit is around €2,500 (US$3,700) but can reach nearly €4,000 (US$5,925) depending on the choice of fabric and workmanship.

The cheapest items in the cardinal's closet are the red socks which sell at an average of €10 (US$15) a pair, in clerical shops around the city.

Cardinals get most of their wardrobe from benefactors, including family and friends. The gold rings received during Sunday's Mass are a gift from Benedict.

Although to some the elaborate garb might seem obsolete, the current wardrobe is almost minimalist compared to the one in vogue less than 50 years ago.

Cardinals named by Pope John XXIII, who died in 1963, also wore a princely silk cloak with an extensive train, a wide-brimmed velvet hat with braided tassel and shoes decorated with shiny gold buckles.

Today's globe-trotting cardinals wear sturdy black loafers.


TERESA BENEDETTA
00sabato 24 novembre 2007 00:06
WYD-SYD UPDATE

I think it is time to open up a thread for the Sydney event, and I will do so, as soon as I have put together everything that has been posted about it so far....




Taking Canberra's Pulse; Youth-Day Beanies;
Gearing Up for Days in the Diocese

By Catherine Smibert


SYDNEY, Australia, NOV. 22, 2007 (Zenit.org).- Among my many and frequent travels across this Australian land of late, I have been overwhelmed by the fervor of each of the 28 dioceses in the anticipation of World Youth Day. I look forward to giving you all a taste of what's to come via this column by highlighting the activities being coordinated by each diocesan group over the coming months.

* * *

The Capital

In his speech to the hundreds of young participants gathered in the hall of Canberra's Marist College, Archbishop Mark Colerige of Canberra-Goulburn told the group that, combined they all looked like "one big refresh button on a computer."

Archbishop Colerige was addressing his flock at the first annual diocesan youth summit -- "The Pulse" -- held Nov. 16-17 in Australia's capital city.

Though Sydney is where all the action will take place July 15-20, some 5,000 to 10,000 international pilgrims will have the chance to visit the Canberra-Goulburn Archdiocese for four days of activities leading up to the World Youth Day week.

The Pulse summit included sharing, singing, praying, preparing and "just having fun in the Lord," 20-year-old participant Liam Mackay told me while munching on a sausage sandwich, courtesy of the event directors.

He added that coming from Cooma - a more rural area of the region-- the event was a "fantastic opportunity to see what is on offer via the wider Church community, which you wouldn't necessarily have a chance to do in your own parish. So it's really given me a taste of what's to come at World Youth Day."

Executive officer of the WYD Canberra squad, Brett Anderson, explained why the summit was named The Pulse: "As in taking someone's pulse - seeing how they're feeling and then giving them the right medicine - Christ - to make their hearts beat more strongly again."

Accordingly, they received guidance from their archbishop who, in turn, set his benchmark in keeping with the standard of the original World Youth Day creator - Pope John Paul II.

The prelate told me: "One of the great insights which John Paul II had with World Youth Day was that young people aren't just the Church of the future as we often say they are -- but he understood that they are the Church of now.

"And we in Canberra are doing our best to support the acknowledgement that the Spirit is calling the young people to lead the Church into new and exciting territory in exciting new ways."

This is why Canberra-Goulburn has constructed its very own, customized phase-by-phase process to build on the momentum of World Youth Day before, during and after the actual event, taking up the theme "Seeking the Heart of Jesus."

The archbishop insists that, in fact, the formation programs being offered to the youth in the diocese are not just forming leaders for World Youth Day, but rather "leaders of the Church for the future of Australia."

* * *

Close-Knit Community

Down Under, while summer is just around the corner, it will be winter by the time the World Youth day pilgrims start arriving.

That's why hundreds of people across the Central West are knitting beanies for those who might not appreciate the weather report prior to arrival - and as a true sign of welcome.

The Bathurst Diocese will host over 1,300 pilgrims from Ireland, Brazil, Saint Lucia, France, the United States, Venezuela, Denmark, Germany, Italy and Canada a week before the official World Youth Day celebrations begin in Sydney on July 15.

Executive director of World Youth Day in the Bathurst Diocese, Gabrielle Sinclair, says the "Knitting Together Project" also serves to unite both the young and the older community.

"People of all ages around the region are knitting orange beanies in solidarity, with our Bathurst logo on them, which was designed by two students from the diocese," Sinclair explained.

And, in true World Youth Day spirit, the unique venture has already received a great response from the whole community.

Jill McKenzie is one of the knitters using her skills to contribute to the largest Catholic youth event in the world. "I got involved with this project, as knitting is something that I can actually do, so it allows people like myself who aren't particularly involved in the nitty-gritty of the organization of this massive event to lend a hand -- literally."

Kathy Bowman is coordinating the knitting in the cathedral parish and says the 60 volunteer knitters from around Bathurst have done a great job so far.

Both McKenzie and Bowman see World Youth Day as a good opportunity for the Bathurst Diocese to join together and appreciate their faith.

According to Sinclair, that is the idea behind the project: "It's about knitting together on many levels, connecting as community and sharing our skills, to create something practical as a gift of love and a prayer to both our own pilgrims and our international guests on their journey."

* * *

Singing is Praying Twice

In the lead up to World Youth Day 2008, contemporary music with a Catholic flavor is playing a key role in conveying the messages it aims to present.

Paulini, key performer of the official theme song "Receive the Power," identified why this is the case.

"Music is something that everyone loves and it brings them together," she told me.

Composers of the song agree. Guy Sebastian and Gary Pinto told me what an honor it is to witness the potency of the Gospel when presented in song.

Sebastian, past winner of Australian Idol, hopes that the song "will further help to cement the message of this amazing event into people's hearts" and that "through singing 'Alleluia, receive the power,' the youth will know that it is not through our own talents that we do this, but by the power of God. ... Nothing is impossible to his Holy Spirit."

Pinto extends an encouraging hand to all young Catholic musicians and artists consistent with the call of John Paul II in his Letter to Artists (1999), saying that as musicians "we are in the vocational service of beauty. What greater beauty to be presenting to people than that of God? It's so humbling and spiritually rewarding to be able to give the gifts he gave us back to him."

And other groups have stepped up to the call in turn -- not just the big names.

The Emmanuel Worship band is a group of musicians from Brisbane, Queensland, who produce music ministry for every youth meeting -- whether it be highly liturgical or punk rock. The troupe has been involved in spreading the World Youth Day message around Australia, via the animation of a series of events with the cross and icon journey.

Mass Revival is another worship rock band that has been lending its gifts in the preparatory stage of the youth event. The band won the 2004 YELL! Catholic songwriting competition, presented to them by Cardinal George Pell.

I discovered that the members of both groups have deeply experienced the effectiveness of music as a tool for spreading Christ's message.

Patrick Keady, keyboardist and composer in the Emmanuel Worship group, told me: "In music ministry, what we are trying to do is communicate an age-old message, which has seemed dead, but it's not; it is fresh, alive and vibrant.

"Music is a universal language that everyone gets. When you speak this language, it helps the transition from an old generation to a new generation who needs to rise up and take their place in history. And it does it in a way that they understand."

As Christian bands producing a similar sound to that of popular culture, they seek to take advantage of particular styles of music to help others experience Jesus.

"The beginning point definitely has to be a personal relationship with Jesus," said 23-year-old Bernard Drumm, guitarist from Mass Revival. "There's no point in being a Christian if you don't understand that you need to have a personal relationship with Jesus. So our objective is to motivate all to follow Christ and to try to understand the joy and hope that is in him and that will help us live the faith."

These two Christian bands, as Catholics, also try to allow people to see another face of Catholicism.

"A lot of young Catholics have been brought up with many misconceptions about the Church and its teachings," said Drumm, a seminarian. They think that it's something from yesterday that doesn't relate to today."

"As Catholics," he continues, "we seem to spend a lot of time defending our beliefs and trying to explain ourselves into oblivion ... rather than just allowing the joy we find in it to inspire the core of the hearts of others so they may begin their own search for that Truth which is the source of our joy."

Of course, in the context of World Youth Day, music is helping promote the event itself, as well as the Church.

The drummer for the Mass Revival band, Michael Campbell, feels that "the sense of sharing that music provides is representative of what's to come at World Youth Day when you have so many people from different cultures and languages coming together, singing and dancing in the Lord."

Lead singer of Mass Revival, Daniel Foster, added: "World Youth Day shows you are part of a huge Church and that this is an event showing that we are one Church holding an event for our young people in Australia, and even non-Catholics will see that this is really something.

"When people hear our name Mass Revival they seem to think that we are lobbying for a revival of the Mass, but that's not the case, as much as we are seeking a revival en masse for our Catholic communities.

"So as each of us musicians and artists use our gifts in conjunction with the Holy Spirit, in God's name and for his sake, we pray that he use us to assist in refreshing and reviving our Church here in this great southland and across the world."

* * *

Catherine Smibert is a freelance writer in Sydney, Australia. She can be reached at catherine@zenit.org.


TERESA BENEDETTA
00sabato 24 novembre 2007 04:22
A NEW PROSPECT FOR UNITY



This is a front-page commentary in the 11/24/07 issue of Osservatore Romano which is not bylined, but the initials at the end of the story (c. de c.) appear to indicate Carlo De Cicco, dthe deputy editor. Here is a translation.

Ecumenism is not an option but a sacred obligation: there is no realistic alternative to ecumenism and above all, to faith.
Between this beginning and conclusion is the key to reading the report presented by Cardinal Walter Kasper at the cardinals' plenary meeting on the eve of today's Consistory.

In the formal and precise language of the official communique on the morning session and that used by Kasper himself (who presented his report as "information and reflections on the present ecumenical situation'), the college of cardinals sanctioned the turn of events that had previously been outlined in Pope Benedict XVI's prior interventions.

There is no doubt whatsoever about the ecumenical choice that the Catholic Church has taken, but it is also clear that a phase has ended when it seemed that the reunification of Chrsitians seemed at hand.

But confidence must be reconfigured in what men, with their initiatives, no matter how brilliant or courageous these may be, are able to determine, recognizing openly that unity is above all, the work of God, a gift of the Spirit.

To give back to God primacy even in ecumenical affairs is not to stand still or go backward, but, for every believer, to place opnself in the right perspective.

What has been achieved so far was important to make ecumenism 'more mature, more adult', a reality that is now perceived as "normal in the life of the Church."

The past years have not brought an easy unity born of compromise, but the Christian churches have rediscovered their brotherhood. To the pragmatic and efficiency-driven mind, not to have concrete results which can be quantified as in a balance sheet means faliure or at least a setback.

There have been no such results in ecumenism. Painstaking effort seems to have prevailed over satisfaction. Actually, Cardinal Kasper tells us, only the inattentive do not appreciate what it means to rediscover brotherhood, by Christians who have been divided for centuries - at times ferociously so - to 'find themselves bothers and sisters again.'

This rediscovered brotherhood is a stage and an indispensable premise for going forward on the road to full unity. At first, we did not talk to each other, indded we did not listen to each other. But now we are talking, and we are mutually committed to reach that unity which Christ asked of all his disciples and not only from some of them.

If the Seat of Peter has become a "reference point that is ever more important for all the churches and all the ecclesiastical communities" in the redicovered path of brotherhood, so is the conviction that emerges with the new ecumenical prospective.

"Only by relying on a common faith," Kasper said, "is it possible to dialog on our differences. And this shlould take place withclarity and without polemics. We should not offend the sensibilities of others nor discredit them; we should not point our fingers at that which our ecumenical partners are not and on that which they do not have. Rather we should give testimony for the richness and beauty of our faith in a positive and welcoming way. And from others, we hope for the same attitude. An ecumenishm of exchange is not an impoverishment but reciprocal enrichment."

Spiritual ecumenism is in fact the soul itself of the ecumenical movement. The new perspective does not mean that each of one retreats to his own corner awaiting the initiative of a generic divine intervention. It means giving back to God the primacy in the search for unity.

"When, where and how is not for us to say. This must be left to him who is Lord of the Church and who will bring together his church from the four winds."

To place God in the first place does not make sense in a secularist society wher he is irrelevant. The change in the ecumenical sphere that places God back in the first place is instead a milestone. It gives new flavor to the effort of each man in behalf of the Kingdom fo God.

The more Christians repent and have 'a firm faith that is conscious of the Triune and Only living God, in the divinity of Christ, in the saving force of the cross and the resurrection," the more the divisions between them will be reduced to just a long and bitter parenthesis in past history.

The Catholic Church confirms everything good that has been done in the ecumenical sphere since the Second Vatican Council. It examines with attention - and full consciousness of the complexity involved - the results that have so far been achieved among the different interlocutors: the Churches of the first millennnium, the ecclesiatical communities born directly or indirectly from the Reformation of the 16th century, and the 'third wave' of the charismatic and pentecostal mvoements that emerged at the start of the 20th century.

The steps we have taken along these three areas of the ecumenical course vary. Kasper recalls that Pope Benedict XVI "has underscored that with these Churches we are already in an ecclesial communion which is almost full."

With the Orthodox churches, after years of complicated relations, we have entered 'a promising third phase of dialog' so that now a meeting 'between the Holy Father and the Patriarch of Moscow' would be 'useful'.

Notwithstanding the difficulties that remain in the dialog with the Orthodoc Churches, "the hope is strong and legitimate that, with the help of God and thanks to the prayers of so many faithful, the Church, after the divisions of the second millennium, will return in the third to breathe once again with both its lungs."

Towards the ecclesiatiscal communities born from the Reformation, there is 'not an arrest but a profound change in the ecumenical situation'. In this sphere, ecumenism finds itself having to confront the pluralist situation of the post-modern society. New challenges have also arisen from the 400 million faithful who constitute the charismatic and pentecostal movements in all the world.

The conclusive note of Kasper's reflections is full of hope. There is no single answer to follow in the ecumenical journey. But the signs of the times are such that one cannot turn back in the march towards "the full and visible unity of all the followers of Christ" which he himself left behind as his testmanet.

(©L'Osservatore Romano - 24 novembre 2007)
TERESA BENEDETTA
00domenica 25 novembre 2007 06:36
Will Group of Anglicans Come Home to Rome?
By Deacon Keith Fournier
11/24/2007

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)


As the Anglican communion world wide suffers from internal division over issues of Christian orthodoxy, could a significant movement of Anglicans soon be received into the full communion of the Catholic Church?


Bishop John B. Lipscomb, former Bishop of the Southwest Florida Diocese of the Episcopal Church, is requesting “to be released from my ordination vows and the obligations and responsibilities of a member of the House of Bishops. I have taken this step in order to be received into the Catholic Church… Through a long season of prayer and reflection Marcie and I have come to believe this is the leading of the Holy Spirit and God’s call for us for the next chapter of our lives.”


LOS ANGELES (Catholic Online) - In his first homily after assuming the Chair of Peter, Pope Benedict XVI signaled his primary and unwavering commitment to Christian Unity, continuing the groundbreaking work of his predecessor, the Servant of God John Paul II.

“Thus, in full awareness and at the beginning of his ministry in the Church of Rome that Peter bathed with his blood, the current Successor assumes as his primary commitment that of working tirelessly towards the reconstitution of the full and visible unity of all Christ’s followers.

This is his ambition, this is his compelling duty. He is aware that to do so, expressions of good feelings are not enough. Concrete gestures are required to penetrate souls and move consciences, encouraging everyone to that interior conversion which is the basis for all progress on the road of ecumenism.”

He has certainly lived up to that commitment.

Pope Benedict XVI has tirelessly promoted progress toward full communion between the Orthodox and Catholic Churches. He has reached out to Christian communities in the lineage of the Protestant Reformation in the West. Finally, he has offered his constant prayer and pastoral solicitude to Christians in the Anglican Communion as their own community has been beset with internal difficulties.

Reports in the European Press indicate that the Holy Father is in discussion with the Cardinals who have gathered in Rome, among other things, concerning the proper response to an ‘en masse’ overture from an entire group of disaffected Anglicans who have sought full communion with the Roman Catholic Church.Cardinals serve as advisors to the Pope and have historically been consulted on important decisions.

Sources indicate that a formal request from a large group of Anglicans for full communion with the Catholic Church is also to be discussed. Bishops of the “Traditional Anglican Communion” (TAC) officially petitioned for what they called a “full, corporate, sacramental union” with the Roman Catholic Church. The letter was personally delivered to the Holy See by their representative.

In 1980 the Holy See implemented the “Pastoral Provision” which made it possible for individual married Episcopal priests, after entering the Catholic Church, to be considered for ordination to the Roman Catholic priesthood. It also authorized the establishment of “Anglican Use” parishes. Since then, a growing number of former Episcopal priests have been ordained to the Catholic priesthood. Additionally, several Anglican use parishes have been established.

This latest overture from member groups within the “Traditional Anglican Communion” represents a significant movement in the growing interest among Anglican Christians to pursue full communion with the Catholic Church.


TERESA BENEDETTA
00domenica 25 novembre 2007 06:48
Cardinal McCarrick's scandal
becomes bishops' scandal

By Editor and Staff
catholicinsight.com/
Issue of December 2007




Washington — Theodore Cardinal McCarrick is no longer archbishop of Washington, but even in retirement, he is holding to his position of accommodation with “pro-choice” Catholic politicians. Furthermore, he is always ready and willing to enunciate his views in this regard to the secular media.

In a late October interview with the Associated Press, the Cardinal criticized statements by the Archbishop of St. Louis, Raymond Burke, who stated as long as five years ago that priests should not give Holy Communion to Catholics who publicly support abortion.

Recently, Burke repeated this stand with respect to Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, on the grounds that the politician is “a Catholic who has been publicly espousing positions contrary to the moral law and … knows it.”

McCarrick opposes Burke’s position based on a vague rule of his own; namely, “that no elected official will ever perfectly fall in line with every policy position the Church takes” (LifeSiteNews, Oct. 16, 2007). McCarrick mentioned euthanasia and the death penalty. (Editor: The latter indicates his confusion: opposition to the death penalty is a prudential option, not a mandatory teaching of the Church.)

Papal and magisterial teachings against abortion, contraception and euthanasia, solemnly re-affirmed over the last 40 years — notably in the 1995 encyclical Evangelium vitae — seem to be regarded by the Cardinal as optional for Catholic politicians. This has been his position since at least 2004, when he first issued such statements and held a private meeting with then-Democratic presidential candidate and “pro-choice” Catholic, John Kerry.

Archbishop Burke, on the other hand, is one of a group of U.S. bishops who have asked their priests to deny the Eucharist to pro-abortion politicians. In 2004, he had asked several such politicians to meet with and be counselled by him. When they refused, he issued a ban that remains in place in his archdiocese.

In September 2007, 16 senators were accused of rejecting their Catholic faith when they voted against the restoration of the Mexico City policy, which prohibits U.S. taxpayer dollars from funding organizations that commit or promote abortions in foreign countries. Fifteen of the 16 were observed to have been voting “against life … consistently for a long period of time,” said American Life League president Judie Brown (OneNewsNow.com, Sept. 27, 2007).

A Princeton University professor says the scandal of pro-abortion Catholics threatens more damage to the Church than that of pedophile priests, although the latter receives more press coverage.

“Nothing undermines the cause of justice and cultural reform and renewal more than the bad example of prominent Catholics who have made themselves instruments of what Pope John Paul II bluntly described as ‘the culture of death,’” says Robert George, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence (LifeSiteNews, August 13, 2007).

U.S. bishops continue to be divided on this issue, with the great majority refusing to be engaged at all. In mid-November 2007, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops was to vote on a document spelling out guidelines for Catholic politicians. It put great emphasis on the life issues and recommended that one be guided “more by our moral convictions than by our attachment to a political party or interest group.”

Unfortunately, there was no mention of what the bishops themselves should do to fulfill their duties such as adhering to Canon Law 915, which states that “those who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.”

Many U.S. pro-life activists are increasingly angry at the do-nothing attitude of their ecclesiastical leaders, especially after their disastrous handling of homosexual sex abuse cases that came to light in 2002 and for which the bishops themselves have denied any responsibility.

Archbishop Burke has received support from the American Life League (ALL), the Knights of Columbus, various brother bishops and the Confraternity of Catholic Clergy, a national association of priests.
TERESA BENEDETTA
00domenica 25 novembre 2007 14:06
'The cathedral belongs to the nation':
Government authorities say Catholic Church
powerless to close Mexico City Cathedral
despite recent attacks by leftists
because it is state-owned property

California Catholic Daily
Nov. 24, 2007



When ecclesiastical authorities decided to close the doors of the Metropolitan Cathedral in Mexico City indefinitely following a Sunday, Nov. 18, attack on worshippers by leftists during the noon Mass, some politicians, instead of condemning the aggressors, severely criticized the Church for shuttering the cathedral.

The first reaction came from Marcelo Ebrard, chief of government for Mexico’s capital city, the Federal District. After learning the cathedral had been closed, Ebrard declared, “The cathedral belongs to the nation, not to the Catholic church, so they cannot unilaterally close it up.”

The Church has imposed a condition on the government before it is willing to reopen the cathedral: City authorities must sign a written pledge to protect the faithful and safeguard freedom of worship.

There are clear signs that civil authorities are going to do just that, and that the cathedral will soon re-open. Nevertheless, the Nov. 18 and other recent attacks on the cathedral have revived a long-simmering debate about what rights churches have over their places of worship in Mexico.

The eminent attorney Raúl Carrancá y Rivas said in a radio interview that, according to Mexican law, by closing the cathedral, the Catholic Church has violated the rights of third parties by preventing them access to a national monument.

Both Carrancá and Ebrard insist that the only authority empowered to close down a place of worship is the Secretary of Government, who, according to the General Law of Public Property, is in charge of anything related to publicly owned real state assets.

But the same law says the Church has not only the right but also the responsibility to “preserve the integrity of public property under its custody.”

According to Mexican law, the cathedral does not belong to the Catholic Church, even though it was built by the Church in the 16th century. The Metropolitan Cathedral, as with all other places of worship in Mexico, is “public property.” All Church property was confiscated - churches, schools, hospitals, seminaries and convents - by the anti-Catholic faction that took power in Mexico during the second half of 19th century.

The General Law of Public Property provides that the places of worship of any religion are “federal real state used for religious purposes.” The government concession is temporary and conditioned, and it can take them back at will.

Article III of this law provides that the government is the only institution authorized to “decide which religious association has the right to use and guard a federal real state property.” So the government has the right to take a Catholic church and give it to a different denomination, as it has done during periods of anti-Catholic persecution.

In 1880, the government transferred the emblematic 16th century temple of San Francisco in Mexico City to a Protestant denomination, and the same thing happened to many other Catholic churches during that period.

Although it is highly unlikely that anything like this would happen in Mexico today, the fact that the anti-clerical laws still remain in force and that churches do not have the right of ownership even over their own places of worship, illustrates the reality that full religious freedom is still a long way off – even in such a religious country.
TERESA BENEDETTA
00lunedì 26 novembre 2007 02:12
Interview with Archbishop Kondrusiewicz
of Minsk-Mohilev, Belarus

By JOHN ALLEN JR.
Rome
November 24, 2007


Ecumenism has been a central theme during this week’s consistory, dominating Friday’s business meeting of the cardinals with the pope, and surfacing again in Benedict XVI’s homily at Sunday’s Ring Mass.

Few figures on the Catholic landscape have a more direct experience of the promise and perils of ecumenism, especially as it involves the Orthodox, than Archbishop Tadeusz Kondrusiewicz of Minsk in Belarus.

From 1991 to 2007, Kondrusiewicz served as the top Catholic official in Russia; in 2002, he became the archbishop of the “Archdiocese of the Mother of God of Moscow,” so named to avoid calling him the “Archbishop of Moscow” – a title that would have offended the Orthodox Patriarchate of Moscow, which considers Russia the heart of its “canonical territory.”

Today Kondrusiewicz finds himself the leader of a small Catholic community in another overwhelmingly Orthodox nation, one that moves to a great extent in Russia’s orbit.

Kondrusiewicz was in Rome this week for a conference sponsored by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, and on Saturday, Nov. 25, he sat down with NCR for an interview at the Pontifical Russian College, known colloquially as the “Russicum.”


You’ve had a remarkable, and in many ways unique, experience of ecumenism on the ground. From your point of view, where do things stand in our relationship with the Orthodox?
First of all, it’s very important that the Holy Father pays such great attention to ecumenical developments. In his first speech after his election as pope, he said that one of the goals of his pontificate would be to reach visible unity.

Later on he’s pursued other initiatives, and in this consistory he’s once again talking to the cardinals, those who are closest to the pope, his helpers, about how to go forward.

We have some good signs at the present time. First of all, the theological dialogue [with the Orthodox churches] was resumed last year. That’s so important, because it was stopped for almost six years. It’s also important that it took up again last year in Belgrade, because Serbia is an Orthodox country.

If we are speaking to each other, if we’re dealing with issues, then we have some goal. Everybody who is around the table has a goal, and an intention to reach this goal. If you’re not talking to each other, it’s very bad. The mere fact that we’ve started to speak to each other again is the greatest achievement.

Now, we have had the meeting in Ravenna. [Note: the Joint International Commission for Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church met in Ravenna, Italy, Oct. 8-14, publishing a document calling for study of the functions of the bishop of Rome, how his primacy is to be exercised, and the scriptural and theological foundations of the primacy. The Patriarchate of Moscow, however, refused to participate in the meeting because of tensions with the Patriarchate of Constantinople over the recognition of the independence of the Orthodox church in Estonia.]

The document from Ravenna, I would say, is a very small step forward. It’s a very, very small step on a long journey in front of us, but every long journey starts with a first step. It can be very small, but it’s the first step. You can’t go a long way without a first step.

Unfortunately, there were some problems inside the Orthdox churches … well, not “there were,” there are some problems. What we can do about that as Catholics isn’t clear. I’m not in the position of Cardinal Kasper, but we can pray. Maybe we can be some kind of moderator to help solve the problems inside the Orthodox churches … that’s a role we can reflect on, if it would be helpful to the Orthodox.

The discussion at Ravenna was important, and it’s not good that the Moscow Patriarchate was absent. There are 15 independent Orthodox churches, but the reality is that the Moscow Patriarchate is the biggest. We have to consider these things. They’re the biggest and the most powerful.

It’s not just because of the number of believers, but also the Moscow Patriarchate is spread all over the world today, in part because of Russians living in different countries. They’re living in Italy, in the United States, in France, and so on. They certainly have a right to take care of their people.

As far as I know, the Orthodox churches are studying this document to evaluate it. It’s good that Ravenna took place, but it’s unfortunate that the Russian Orthodox were not able to participate. I understand why it happened, and why not everyone was able to share the position of the Russian Orthodox church.

Now they are studying this document, and we have to pray that the problems within the Orthodox churches will be solved. We’re on the way, but without the Moscow Patriarchate, I don’t believe we can make real progress.


What is your reaction to the Ravenna document itself?
It’s a start. I like that they took this step. They didn’t solve any problems, but there is at least some direction. We have to follow this up, figure out how to go forward. If we are speaking about the position of the Successor of Peter here in Rome, we know how we see his role in the universal church.

But that’s so difficult for other churches to accept, and we have to speak not only with the Orthodox churches, but also with Protestant churches and communities. Maybe this will be the next step, though I don’t know when. Anyway, what’s important is to take the first step, and that has now been done.


You know very well that there are some people who would look at all the energy Catholicism has invested since the Second Vatican Council in relations with the Orthodox, without a great deal to show for it in terms of movement towards visible unity, and wonder if it’s really worth it. How do you react to that?
There’s a very good Russian expression, which roughly means that “to build is very difficult, to destroy is very easy.” In this case, things were destroyed almost 1,000 years ago, in 1054.

Look, in any case, there are some good signs … Ravenna, the resumption of the theological dialogue, and so on. Also, we have to admit that before the Second Vatican Council, also our position as Catholics towards the Orthodox was not very friendly, frankly.

Now we call each other brothers. Now we are ready to work together, to cooperate, facing the challenges of the modern society, especially secularization and moral relativism. In this sense, we are absolutely speaking the same language, Catholics and Orthodox.

We are ready to go forward together, because we both see that the chief danger for the Christian world is this process of secularization. The time to throw stones is past. Now we have to collect the stones and build something together.


I want to come back to secularization in a minute, but first I want to ask something else about primacy, which you mentioned a moment ago. Having lived among the Orthodox for so long, especially in Russia, do you believe it’s truly possible that they will accept at some future point a role for the Bishop of Rome as primate of the universal church?
That’s a question almost impossible to answer. We have to work, as Pope John Paul II pointed out in his encyclical Ut Unum Sint, to stress that the role of Peter is as a servant to all Christians. Maybe we have to focus our efforts on this. We can’t just say, ‘Everything will be very nice under the pope,’ and so on.

I explained many, many times that inside the Catholic church, we have a lot of Byzantine rite churches, Oriental rite churches, sui iuris churches [churches “under their own law”]. This probably is the way, because they’re absolutely independent.


Realistically, do you believe the Orthodox will ever accept that?
(laughs) We have to work.


Returning to secularization, two of the cardinals from Eastern Europe in the meeting with the pope on Friday said that one promising area of ecumenical work between Catholics and Orthodox is common efforts against secularization. Can you tell me concretely what that means?
Next Tuesday, I’m going to sign a common declaration together with Metropolitan Filaret in Minsk, along with the Baptists and Lutherans, to outline a common strategy against AIDS. We are going to sign this document at the Academy of Science in Minsk.

It’s a good sign that we who represent different Christian churches nevertheless can stay together on this issue, can sign this document. The problem is a very important one all around the world, and when people will see this on TV, they’ll see that we can speak together.

Very often I met a lot of people in Russia who were very upset that we don’t speak together defending Christian values, peace, and so on. Often we speak in the same voice, but we speak separately.

Now common declarations are one way to cooperate – on euthanasia, for example, or abortion or divorce. In Moscow, we have a very powerful family center. They organize a lot of conferences together with the Orthodox church, and people know this. Recently, government officials have been coming to us to ask us to organize lectures – they ask the Catholics and the Protestants together with the Orthodox.

I don’t know if you’re familiar with the name of Fyodor Petrovich Gaaz, who was a German physician, a medical doctor, who was born in Germany but who spent practically all his life in Russia as a doctor.

He took care of prisoners, and he was widely admired. He enjoyed what we traditionally call fama santitatis, or the “fame of sainthood.” Even today, you can find flowers on his grave not only from Catholics but also from Orthodox. He was Catholic, but many Orthodox also call him a saint. (His name was “Friedrich-Joseph Haass” in German, but everyone knows him by his Russian name.)

There are streets named after him, a hospital dedicated to him, in Moscow. Last April, I organized a conference dedicated to him, and Metropolitan Sergei from the Moscow Patriarchate came. There were also lots of other Orthodox people who came to the lectures, including people from government offices and so on. But people were talking about it … ‘the Orthodox Metropolitan came!’ He was friendly, and it was very important.

Such things, which are small in themselves probably, are nevertheless very, very significant.


By the way, what does your common declaration on AIDS say?
Well, that we have to join our forces. We have a common obligation to educate people in a moral sense, and to participate in different efforts organized as churches, and also those put together by the state. I’m thinking about conferences and so on.

In terms of education, we need something different than what we have today, which is generally the idea of ‘safe sex.’ We need to talk about a moral dimension, especially chastity.


Also yesterday in the conversation with the cardinals and the Holy Father, there was talk once again about a meeting between Pope Benedict and Patriarch Alexy II of Moscow. Do you believe such a meeting is possible?
Yes, I do believe that, though I don’t know when. God knows.


If it happens, what would its importance be?
It would be very important. It would turn a new page in our relationship, and it can change many things. It would create a new stage, and a new type, of our relationship. It would also help meet the challenges of our secular world.


Some people say it would basically be little more than a photo-op, without much substance.
Sure, some say this. The position of the Moscow Patriarchate is that the patriarch doesn’t like to have meetings only for pictures, but that he wants to achieve some concrete results. It must help us to promote the dialogue, to work together, to respond to the challenges of our societies and the modern world, and to reinforce our efforts to defend Christian values and return to our Christian roots.


Are you saying that in some ways, the future of relations with the Orthodox is less theological dialogue and more cooperation on practical social and cultural issues?
I would like to move in both directions at once. Without the theological base, one day we will stop. In any case, we have to develop these theological relationships. Cooperation on other matters is often easier, but during the absence of this theological dialogue, we felt that something was missing, that things aren’t good.


When the Moscow Patriarchate says it wants concrete results before a meeting between the pope and the patriarch could happen, what do they have in mind?

We have to speak with the Moscow Patriarchate on this theme, but usually we’re accused of proselytism, of invading their canonical territory. So, one thing would be to solve this problem of ‘canonical territory,’ trying to define what it means. As Catholics, we have no such term. In a sense we have it inside dioceses, but nothing more. Also, the theological level must be involved here.

I have declared many times, and I would like to repeat once more through you, that there is no intention of the Roman Catholic Church to proselytize. It’s absolutely nonsense, senseless, especially after the Second Vatican Council when we recognize that our churches have the same means of salvation.

On the other hand, we have to leave freedom of choice to people to believe or not to believe, to be Catholics or Orthodox of Protestants, and so on. My own personal position is that if some people are leaving my church and going, for example, to one of the sects, I don’t blame these sectarians for stealing my people. Instead, I need to blame myself – it probably means that I’m working badly.


Of course, you and others have been saying for many years that the Catholic Church has no intention of proselytism in Russia. Are the Orthodox listening?
Since 2004, we have had a mixed commission [to examine charges of proselytism], and there were some concrete problems in a few places. Now you don’t hear so many accusations. It has calmed down a little bit. Probably we can solve this problem.

In any event, there is no intention of the Catholic church to take away faithful from the Orthodox. No bishop is inviting priests for this purpose. We have always said we can’t do this.


You know the Orthodox mind very well. How do you think they see Pope Benedict XVI?
They’re very pleased with him. They consider him as the greatest theologian of our time, an open-minded man and pope.


Greatest ‘Catholic theologian’ of our time, or greatest theologian period?
Well, the greatest Catholic theologian, and a great Christian theologian. They appreciate his declarations of respect for the churches of the East, his openness to dialogue, his desire to promote ecumenical unity, and to collaborate to solve the problems of moral relativism and Christian values. They admire him.


How much difference does it make that he’s German instead of Polish?
Well, I don’t know. Pope John Paul II laid the foundations, and now we have to build a little bit more. On the other hand, probably you’re right a little bit … the Russian Orthodox Church doesn’t emphasize this question of being Polish vs. German, but on the other hand we have to say that there are some animosities between Russia and Poland, in a historical sense. Of course, we have to overcome all these things.


Is there some practical step Pope Benedict could take right now that would move the relationship with the Orthodox forward?
To continue this dialogue, to promote this dialogue, involving the churches … I think basically he’s doing the right thing. It’s impossible to overcome the legacy of more than 1,000 years immediately. It’s a process, so the key is to stay the course.


One final question about Russia generally. From a distance, we hear a lot these days about a rebirth of Russian nationalism, about Putin’s more aggressive foreign policy driven by the country’s oil revenues, and so on. Should we be worried about a return to the tensions of the Cold War?
No, I don’t think so. I think all that is past. I’m not a politician, but I don’t think that can happen in the present time. Look, Putin is very popular. If the constitution allowed him to be elected for a third time, he would win very easily. The country is growing, and people like him.

Plus, when the United States is trying to build this anti-rocket system in Poland and the Czech Republic and so on, sure, Russia is worried about it. If Russia were building something off the coast of Alaska, you would be worried to. It’s only natural. But it doesn’t mean Russia wants to go to war. Lots of Russians these days travel, they live abroad. Many Russians are studying abroad. They don’t want to go back to the past.

======================================================================

It's really grown tiresome - and more obviously a pretext - this position of Alexei II that he does not see a point to meeting with the Pope unless there is something concrte to meet about.

What about just meeting for the sake of showing good faith? Where is it written in any diplomatic rule book - or in simple common sense, for that matter - that a first meeting cannot be held as a sign of good will and good faith, if not of friendship? It happens all the time in the secular world! And that has been the nature of all the meetings held by the Popes after Vatican-II with the heads of other Orthodox churches, the Anglicans and the Reformed churches.

Or how about a meeting to seal an understanding about a common stand against secularism - an agremeent that could be framed in terms of a practical program to be carried out by both Churches? That would be concrete enough, and urgent, too.

Mons. Kondrusiewicz is understandably tactful about saying it outright, but it is obvious from his answers that he is not very hopeful about any realistic prospects of moving forward with Russia.
Alexei II will just keep raising the bar - today, proselytism, tomorrow, who knows?

Very simply, he appears to prefer being the big fish in a small pond (150 million Russian Orthodox) rather than a 'small fish' in a big pond that has has over a billion Roman Catholics.

As the head of an autonomous Church without any ties to Rome whatsoever, he can claim to be 'equal' in stature to the Bishop of Rome, but within a 'unified' Roman-Orthodox communion, he loses that 'stature', even if, as Kondruziewicz points out, the Orthodox churches would retain their autonomous status in such a set-up.

Maybe what John Allen should have asked is whether there is anyone in the Russian Orthodox hierarchy at present who might conceivably be more 'humble' in this respect, who can face the reality that in a unified Communion, the Pope would inevitably be be 'first among equals' - for one, only the Roman Catholic Pope can claim direct apostolic succession to Peter - as he was in the pre-Schism first millennium, and that there is no way any other Patriarch in the Christian world can counter or refute this.

If there is to be any progress at all, we will have to wait for a Russian Orthodox leader who is less self-important and more sincerely committed to Christian reunification than Alexei is
.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00lunedì 26 novembre 2007 04:30
Mexico City cathedral reopens after rowdy Mass



MEXICO CITY, Nov 24 (Reuters) - The Mexican capital's cathedral, a 400-year-old Roman Catholic bastion, reopened on Saturday under police surveillance almost a week after it shut its doors following a rowdy leftist protest during a Mass.

A mob angry at the church bells tolling during a rally outside burst into the cathedral last Sunday, tearing down railings and overturning pews.

"The biggest symbol for us Catholics is reopening, this is very important for us," churchgoer David Paz told local radio station Formato 21.

More than 30 policemen will guard the cathedral and 30 video cameras will be installed to monitor the premises, Mexico City police chief Joel Ortega said. Police searched bags as people entered the church.

It was the first time the cathedral had shut since the start of the "Cristero" war in the 1920s, in which Catholics fought federal authorities over an anti-clerical campaign by the government after the Mexican Revolution.

The cathedral, whose construction over an Aztec temple was ordered by the clergy accompanying Spanish conquistadors in the 1500s, is a big attraction for foreign tourists in Mexico City's central plaza.

Tensions have risen between Church leaders and the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution, or PRD, since the party narrowly lost last year's presidential election to the conservative National Action Party, which is seen as close to the Catholic Church.

The Church also has sparred with the PRD over recent laws in Mexico City to legalize abortion and gay civil unions. Mexico's top churchman, Cardinal Norberto Rivera, said last month he had received death threats from members of the party.

Mexico is the world's second most populous Catholic nation after Brazil. (Reporting by Cyntia Barrera Diaz)


TERESA BENEDETTA
00lunedì 26 novembre 2007 18:04
VATICAN'S DEPUTY 'FOREIGN MINISTER' WILL LEAD DELEGATION TO ANNAPOLIS

Translated from PETRUS today, citing the news agency IL Velino:




VATICAN CITY - Mons. Pietro Parolin, the Vatican's deputy secretary for foreign relations, will lead the delegation of the Holy See at the international conference for Middle East peace to be held in Annapolis, Maryland, this week.

The news agency Il Velino also learned that Parolin will be assisted by Mons. Franco Coppola, a Middle East expert from the second section of the Secretariat of State.

The Vatican will be one of 50 delegations attending the conference. The announcement this weekend by Saudi Arabia and Syria that they will participate has been seen as an encouraging sign.

Yesterday, before leading the recital of the Angelus, Pope Benedict XVI expressed the hope that the Annapolis conference would lead to a just and definitive peace between Israel and Palestine.

He called on everyone to join the Day of Prayer for Middle East peace that the US bishops conference had designated for the Feast of Christ the King.

Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Houston-Galveston, one of 23 new cardinals created this weekend, said the United States bishops shared the Pope's hope. He said the Day of Prayer was part of the US bishops' decades-long initiative to promote peace in the Middle East.

"In recent years," he added, "the Catholic bishops, along with Jewish, Christian and Muslim leaders, have given rise to the National Inter-Religious Leadership initiative for peace in the Middle East to work for a peaceful solution to the conflicts in the region."

===================================================================

John Allen has a later report:


Parolin to represent
the Holy See at Annapolis

By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Rome
Nov 26, 2007



The Vatican announced this evening that Monsignor Pietro Parolin, under-secretary for Relations with States, will represent the Holy See at tomorrow's Annapolis conference on peace in the Middle East. Parolin will be accompanied by Monsignor Franco Coppola, another official of the Secretariat of State.

Representation at the Annapolis conference has come together only at the last moment, and the Vatican's "Foreign Minister," Archbishop Dominque Mamberti,Under-Secretary for Relations with States in the Secretariat of State, is in Spain and unable to take part. Details for Parolin's participation were finalized Monday afternoon, and he left immediately for Annapolis.

The fact Parolin does not carry the diplomatic rank of a foreign minister could reduce the Holy See's influence at Annapolis, although Parolin is a seasoned and widely respected diplomat with a deep knowledge of the Middle East.

Coppola is another veteran of difficult diplomatic assignments. In 2003, he accompanied Cardinal Roger Etchegaray as Pope John Paul II's special envoy to Baghdad just ahead of the U.S.-led invasion, and in 2006 he was part of the Vatican's delegation to an international conference to resolve the conflict in Lebanon.

The aim of the Annapolis conference, hosted by the Bush administration, is to revive stalled peace talks between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Both Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will attend.

The Vatican has long regarded peace in what Catholics generally call the "Holy Land" a top diplomatic priority. In part, Vatican officials see the Israeli/Palestinian conflict as a long-festering source of global tensions, including those between Islam and the West; in part, too, the Vatican is concerned about a growing exodus of Christians out of the land of Christ's birth and the earliest development of Christianity.

During his Angelus address yesterday after concelebrating Mass with 23 new cardinals, Pope Benedict XVI expressed strong support for the Annapolis conference.

"On Tuesday in Annapolis, in the United States, Israelis and Palestinians plan to relaunch the process of negotiations, with the help of the international community, to find a just and definitive solution to the conflict that has bloodied the Holy Land for sixty years and provoked so many tears and so much suffering for the two peoples," the pope said.

"I ask you to join the Day of Prayer set aside today by the bishops' conference of the United States of America for asking the Spirit of God to bring peace to that region so dear to us, and the gifts of wisdom and courage for all the protagonists of this important meeting," he said.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 novembre 2007 00:51
CARDINAL KASPER ON THE STATE OF ECUMENISM
An interview with PETRUS
By Bruno Volpe



VATICAN CITY - The lights have just dimmed on the Consistory, an event tduring which the Pope,chose to highlight the ecumenical dialog, which was the theme of the richly informative presentation made by Cardinal Walter Kasper to the entire College of Cardinals, including the new ones, last Friday.

PETRUS sought out Kasper, President of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity, for this interview.

Eminence, ecumenism was the main topic during the Consistory. Don't you think this preoccupation would further alienate the traditionalists?
I don't think so. The Catholic Church is for everyone.


Because on a traditionalist site, they posted, during the consistory, a letter signed by Mons. Bernard Fellay, head of the Lefebvrians, who severely attacked the Pope, saying that the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum represents nothing new and will not fool anyone. What do you say of that statement?

All I can say is that the ecumenical dialog certainly does not exclude traditionalists, and that the Church wishes to heal this rift with the Lefbevrians, but I don't think either that the true issue is liturgical for them.

First, the liturgical situation has been normalized, precisely, by the Motu Proprio. Their problem is rather dogmatic and theological. For the Lefebvrians, it has to do with their rejection of Vatican-II and its documents, particularly those that have to do with ecumenism. But they have to take a step forward in this matter. They should accept the Council. That, to me, is the indispensable condition for a definitive reconciliation with the Church.

As far as we are concerned, we are absolutely committed to achieving unity, but this must be wanted by both sides.


What is your own personal evaluation of the ecumenical dialog?
I would say positive. No one is expecting miracles. With the Orthodox, our positions are slowly coming closer, as the Ravenna document states. They have recogniz0ed the Petrine primacy in the historical context, but there are other problems of a theological nature.

I would say that there is much good will on both sides, and I will never tire of reiterating the importance of the Ravenna document as an optimal basis for further dialog.


How is it going with the Protestants?
It is going well with the Lutherans and the Anglicans. Let me repeat: here in Rome, we have always favored open confrontation, and I see a Church that is united along the path of ecumenism and dialog, objectives which the Pope has been pursing insistently becuase he has the extraordinary ability to dialog with everyone.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 novembre 2007 03:29
Spanish government’s 'gestures'
towards the Church could be
'pre-electoral thawing'




Madrid, Nov 26, 2007 (CNA).- The chair of Canon Law at Madrid’s Complutense University, Rafael Navarro-Valls, said this week the Socialist government’s gestures towards the Church could lead to a “pre-electoral thawing,” and he encouraged the faithful “not to let down their guard” at a “moment of transition” like the upcoming elections in early 2008.

According to the weekly bulleting, Alba, during a speech at the Congress on Catholics and Public Life, Navarro-Valls referred to gestures that the Socialist government has made to the Church in Spain, such as the acceptance of religious persecution in the Law on Historic Memory, the sending of vice president Maria Teresa Fernandez de la Vega to the ceremony of elevation of three new Spanish cardinals at the Vatican, the reversal of a decision to denounce the accords with the Holy See, as well as the sending of a delegation to the beatification of 498 Spanish martyrs at the Vatican.

“This does not mean this is not a tactic,” Navarro-Valls warned. There still exists an “evident and unjust discrimination” in the field of education, he noted, resulting in the persecution of those “who oppose the existence of an education that is akin to indoctrination.”

During his remarks, Navarro-Valls reaffirmed the need of the State and the Church “to recover its essences” in response to the extremes of excessive division or union between Church and State, and he defended the independence of the State and the religious freedom of the Church against such “perversions” as “fanaticism and fundamentalism or secularism: politics without morality."



TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 novembre 2007 04:12
Cardinal Martino says
globalization should not be demonized



ROME, NOV, 27, 2007 (Zenit.org).- Though modern times are marked by an "indescribable load of suffering," a Vatican official said he sees signs of "unique and very promising" opportunities.

Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, made this reflection after the 2nd World Congress of the Ecclesial Organizations Working for Justice and Peace, sponsored by his dicastery. It concluded in Rome last Saturday.

The two-day conference, like the pontifical council's plenary assembly held just before it, was dedicated to the consideration of Pope Paul VI's social encylical Populorum Progressio, on the 40th anniversary of its publication.

A concluding statement from the congress said, "The indescribable load of suffering caused by the new fratricidal wars, the bloody inrush of terrorism on the world scene, the persistent increase of scandalous inequality between the poorer countries and the richer countries should not bring a feeling of desperation and paralyzing powerlessness."

“These times also offer unique and very promising opportunities for the integral development and solidarity of humanity,” affirmed Cardinal Martino. "We must not demonize globalization: It can represent a great opportunity, on the condition that it is oriented truly to global solidarity and social justice, in the perspective of the universal common good of the united family of peoples.

"The development of science and of technology can help much as well, while the discoveries of medicine are able to confront successfully the problem of endemic illnesses and of pandemics."

"Besides, there is an ever growing awareness that development is above all a moral problem."

Referring to the encyclical about hope that Benedict XVI will publish this Friday, Cardinal Martino said, “Christian hope is the strength that God gives us in order to fulfill his plan of love for man and for history, in which integral development and solidarity are an essential element.”

Bishop Thomas Wenski of Orlando, Florida, gave the homily at Saturday's Mass during the congress. He suggested that the social doctrine of the Church could be summed up in one phrase: "No man is a problem."

"Any anthropology that would reduce the human person to being just a problem is simply a defective, an erroneous anthropology – unworthy of man created in the image and likeness of God," the prelate said. "When we allow ourselves to think of a human being as a mere problem, we offend his or her dignity.

"This is why Catholic social teachings proclaim a positive and consistent ethic of life: No man is a problem. For us, Catholics, therefore, there is no such thing as a 'problem pregnancy' - only a child, who is to be welcome in life and protected by law. The refugee, the migrant is not a problem. He may perhaps be a stranger, but a stranger to be embraced as a brother. Even criminals - for all the horror of their crimes - do not lose their God-given dignity as human beings."

Bishop Wenski said the mission of Christians is "to model what life looks like when God matters, when man matters."

TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 novembre 2007 14:44
IRAQI PRELATES SEE SIGNS OF HOPE FOR THEIR HOMELAND...
BUT MOSUL REMAINS RISKIEST FOR CHRISTIANS


In his blog today, Sandro Magister refers to the following statement made by Cardinal Delly of Iraq in the interview printed on Page 1 of Osservatore Romano on Nov. 25 (full translation posted that day in NEWS ABOUT BENEDICT]:

What is the present situation in Iraq?
Every day, the population has to face a series of difficulties, especially at the level of communications. But now that things are slowly improving, many families are starting to return to their homes, and even the churches are able to resume worship services. These are signs of hope, and Christians are children of hope.






Magister notes that the 'improving' situation in Iraq is almost a taboo for the Italian MSM who have not reported any of it so far. This is, of course, analogous to what has been the prevailing editorial silence in the American MSM on the same issue, although in the past several days, both the Washington Post and the New York Times finally ran stories acknowledging such 'improvement'.

Further detail of the perception by Cardinal Delly of this improvement was provided a few days earlier by another Chaldean prelate, as reported by AsiaNews.




The fears and hopes of Iraqi Christians

Signs of hope on the horizon of Iraqi Christians.
Security in the country is improving and moderate Muslims are more open to dialogue.

by Louis Sako
Chaldean Bishop of Kirkuk



Kirkuk, Nov. 23 (AsiaNews) – There is a tangible improvement in security in Iraq, especially in Baghdad. The army in co-operation with coalition forces now controls almost all sectors of the capital.

Equally important, some point out that Iran and Syria are controlling their borders with Iraq and not letting terrorists cross into the country.

Yet if violence has dropped it is also for another reason. Slowly the country is turning into ethnically homogenous ethnic areas based upon a design pursued and backed by the United States. Even Iraqi media have been appeased.

According to official sources about a thousand Iraqis are making the trek home from Syria—many are Christian families. Once shut down churches are now reopening.

In Mosul however the situation remains very tense.

Christians at home or among refugee communities are going through an emotional rollercoaster, a mix of fear and hope: they want to hope in a better future but feel they have no guarantees.

Turkey continues to threaten the north, especially since its goal is to prevent the rise of a Kurdish state and put off the referendum in Kirkuk.

In Syria there are plenty of refugees left. Just a few days ago in a conference in Salzburg (Austria), the Syro-Catholic bishop of Aleppo said that some 80,000 Christian Iraqis found refuge in that country. What will they decide? What does the future have in store for them?

We Christians in Iraq have lived through hard times. Many of us have been killed, kidnapped and forced to leave. Families are split and scattered in various countries.

Iraq is our homeland — we have been here long before the arrival of Islam. We are an indigenous people, not some colonial entity coming from somewhere else.

We have given a lot to Islamic culture during the Umayyad and Abbasid eras. We have become part of Islamic culture and today we want to continue to exist in a spirit of love and respect for human rights.

There are signs that feed our hope:

1) The appointment of his Beatitude Emmanuel Delly, Chaldean patriarch of Baghdad, to the office of cardinal is a chance for Western Churches to show their solidarity not only in words but also in deeds by supporting Christians in Iraq, helping them stay.

Christians in Iraq and the Middle East must continue to exist and prosper in order to offer some of their spirituality, liturgy and ecclesial structure to Western Churches. After all, our Churches are the very roots of Christianity.

2) Saudi King Abdullah’s visit to the Holy See could be a sign of hope for better coexistence between different religions in the region. We got the same impression from reading the letter written by 138 Muslim intellectuals to the Pope and other Christian religious leaders.

I believe that peace in the world depends a lot more on inter-faith dialogue than on nuclear talks. A truly sincere dialogue with Christians can give Muslims a chance to learn a lot from the Churches’ experience. Indeed the Qur’an itself says: “Do not discuss with people of the Book except in the best way” (al-Ankaboot: 29, 46).

Extremism and violence will never succeed in changing this situation. Dialogue, recognising the other as a brother, even respect for him for his very difference shall save the world from conflict. And I think something is stirring within Islam in this direction.

The time has come for moderate Muslims to speak up. They are in the majority and must promote interethnic harmony and religious tolerance in their own societies so as to factually demonstrate that Islam is a religion of tolerance and coexistence.

Iraqi Christians have escaped because they do not feel safe and have little faith in coexistence. But their flight is a loss for the Muslim world. With Christians fleeing so do their open-mindedness, skills and high levels of education.

The international community should help us formulate laws that guarantee open and tolerant societies in which each one of us has the right to participate as a citizen and where there are neither oppressive majorities nor oppressed minorities.

After all is said and done, we are still “waiting our blessed hope” (Titus, 2:13).



In a story today, AsiaNews has an intierview with the Bishop of Mosul, a Sunni stronghold, which has been the center of terrorist activity specifically directed at Christians.

Despite continuing threats from terrorists,
Christians continue to hope, says bishop of Mosul




Rome, Nov. 27 (AsiaNews) – Mgr Faraj Raho, Chaldean bishop of Mosul, in Rome with the delegation accompanying Cardinal Emmanuel III Delly at the Consistory, spoke to AsiaNews about the endless suffering Christians in northern Iraq are enduring.

He talked about a city left to fend for itself, easy quarry for terrorism, and an international plan to keep Iraq divided, ignorant and weak. Unlike Iraq’s capital, where the number of attacks has substantially dropped with refugees starting to make their way home according to government sources, Mosul is still in the grip of violence.

Here is an interview Monsignor Raho gave during his recent stay in Rome.


Your Excellency, can you update the situation in Mosul? Over the week-end a news report mentioned a car bomb against a police patrol that killed nine people . . . .
Unlike Baghdad the situation in Mosul is not improving. It is apparent that US-led coalition forces have begun “cleaning up” the country in the south where the influence of Iran and Syria is strongest: Basra, Ramadi, Baquba and Baghdad.

As the US moves up so do the terrorists who are now concentrated in Mosul. This way the US is sure that they cannot go any further unless they want to clash with the Kurds, who are Washington’s allies. But this begs the question. Can anyone clean up Mosul? At present, there seems to be no plan to normalise the situation in the city, which has been left to fend for itself.


In this context how does the existence of the Church and the Christian community continue?
We, Christians of Mesopotamia, are used to religious persecution and pressures by those in power. After Constantine, persecution ended only for Western Christians, whereas in the East threats continued. Even today we continue to be a Church of martyrs. When we recite vesper prayers we have a special hymn for the martyrs.

In Mosul, religious persecution is more noticeable than elsewhere because the city is split along religious lines. Unlike Kirkuk where divisions are ethnic with Kurds, Turkmen and Arabs vying for Christian support, the division between Muslims and Christians is sharper in Mosul.

Of course, everyone is suffering from this war irrespective of religious affiliation, but in Mosul Christians face starker choices. Short of fleeing they can choose between converting to Islam, paying the jizya (poll tax imposed on non-Muslim subjects) or death. Terrorists are behind intimidations and actions designed to achieve any of these three outcomes but so are common criminals who use Islam to get rich. In the meantime only one Christian in three is left in the city.


Who has an interest in emptying the city of its Christian inhabitants?
It is clear that such a plan does not target Christians alone, but the intelligentsia and the professional class as well, Muslims included. However, if Christians are only 3 per cent of the city’s total population they represent 35 per cent of those with a higher education. Forcing these people to leave means preventing the country from rising again. It means fuelling ignorance which is a support for terrorism.

Such a plan is under way elsewhere in the country. Attacks target doctors, lawyers, professors, journalists. The plan is the brainchild of those who run international politics and Iraq’s neighbours. No one wants a free and independent Iraq because it would be too strong. Together we would constitute a great intellectual and economic power. By keeping the country weak and divided, it is easier to dominate it.


You mentioned a Church of martyrs when referring to the Iraqi Church . . . this year your diocese had one martyr, Fr Ragheed Gani. What legacy does his sacrifice have?
For Mosul Christians, Ragheed’s martyrdom was a reason to stay put in Iraq. Those who were weaker in their faith came out stronger.

The Thursday of his death (2 June) was Corpus Domini. I celebrated mass in Holy Spirit Parish Church to send a signal that we must have courage and keep on going. When they attacked the Bishops’ Residence (7 December 2004), we celebrated mass among the rubble.

Ragheed personally saw many attacks. Each time one took place he went there to show the community that despite everything we had to start all over again. Our people does not get discouraged easily and these attacks end up strengthening its resolve.


Christmas is upon us. How will Mosul Christians celebrate it?
Let me say that unlike Baghdad no church was forced to shut down in Mosul. Curfew does prevent late evening and early morning mass. And on Christmas Day we shall conform to the allowed timetable but it is the safest time anyway.

The faithful used to come on their own; now for many meetings and celebrations we organise our own transportation. We’ll do the same on Christmas as well. In various areas we have minibuses driving kids to their respective parish churches for catechism, mass or choir rehearsals. Our drivers are trustworthy individuals. Adult theology courses in Tel Kaif and Karamles rely on our transportation, too.

For people the Church continues to be a meeting place, a source of support, especially for refugees from the rest of the country who found shelter in the villages in the Nineveh Plain near Mosul.

Like Christmas in the past this time the main message of our prayers shall be peace which is what we wish the uppermost and which we have been trying to achieve despite threats and violence.
TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 novembre 2007 14:56
The tradition of the Syriac Churches,
an instrument of dialogue with Islam


A meeting of the Pro Oriente Forum Syriacum highlights the long standing coexistence
between the ancient Churches of Mesopotamia and Islam and how it can play
a vital role in dialogue, Christian witness and cooperation.





Salzburg, Nov. 27 (AsiaNews) – Benefactors of a centuries sold tradition in coexistence alongside Muslims, the ancient Syriac Churches have an important role to play today regarding dialogue, Christian witness and cooperation.

That was the conclusion drawn from a conference which took place between November 14 and 16 in Salzburg Austria organised by Pro Oriente, a foundation of the Vienna Archdiocese which gave birth to Pro Oriente Forum Syriacum in October 2006.

It gathers together academics from the Syriac Churches with an aim to promoting its legacy and work towards improving understanding, cultural enrichment and solidarity.

“Syriac Churches Encountering Islam: Past Experiences and Future Perspectives“, was the theme of the first academic encounter, which involved scholars from Iraq, Syria, United Sates, Austria, Germany, Holland, Italy, India and France.

The conclusions drawn are based on the affirmation that from the very beginning Islam entered into close contact with Christianity of the Syro-Aramaic tradition. The early Umayyad period is marked by an open and tolerant attitude towards Christians. One of the main reasons might have been that the Muslims needed their administrative and economic knowledge and experience to rule and organize the newly conquered territories (for instance St John damascene and his father).

In the attitude of Muslims towards Christians, very soon one can realize certain ambivalence according to the social and political circumstances: At times more open and tolerant, at times more aggressive and even oppressive. This ambivalence is easily justified by different Koranic verses.

Texts concerning Islam written in Syriac (about 20) were mainly for internal use in Christian communities in order to educate and strengthen them in their own faith and to help them respond to certain questions and objections raised by Muslims. Those written in Arabic were approaches to present Christian dogmas and moral to Muslims. Some of them are of an apologetic nature, and others are clearly polemical.

The Abbasid period inaugurates a time of wide and fertile cultural exchange as a consequence of the spread of the Arabic language. Commissioned by the caliphs (bayt al-hikma-house of wisdom), mainly Christians of the Syriac tradition undertook huge systematic translations - especially in the fields of Science, Philosophy, and Medicine - from Greek via Syriac into Arabic.

In this way the knowledge of the Greco-Roman world was made available as one of the foundation for the development of the Arabo-Islamic culture. Through the Arabic presence in Spain this heritage was transmitted to the European Christian Middle Ages.

In the 12th and 13th centuries, after having contributed to the development of the Arabic culture, Christians and Muslims lived in a common cultural world of which they shared the values and achievements. For instance, the most famous West-Syriac scholar of the time, Bar Hebraeus, was capable of distinguishing between Islam as a set of believes, and as a cultural and spiritual tradition.

For the Ottoman period the focus of the papers and discussion was the application of the Millet-system as a new concept defining the status of non-Muslim religious communities. The Millet-system had a very profound impact on the identity of the various Christian communities. It left lasting marks on the minds of the people and even on institutions.

Many problems which Christians face today in the Islamic world cannot be understood if one does not take into account the experience of the Millet-system, which has survived in one or other way in modern states with a Muslim majority. Its real impact remains ambiguous and needs further research.

The Indian experience of Islam on the Malabar Coast contributed to a broader understanding of Christian-Muslim coexistence. It also illustrated that the western colonial interferences often destroyed traditional patterns of living together.

For the important issue of the relations between Christians and Muslims in our times, it is worthwhile to take into account the experience of the past and the present of the Syriac communities, who were capable of developing a form of encounter with their Muslim neighbours in the field of dialogue, Christian witness, coexistence and cooperation.

It is hoped that this endeavour may help the Syriac Christians to better preserve and fructify their rich heritage and offer their unique contribution to the search for Christian unity and to the building of a better and more fraternal with their Muslims neighbours.

The following papers were delivered at the conference:

Muslim-Christian Dialogue in Syriac Sources: An Introduction (Mons. Louis Sako, Kirkuk, Iraq).

Syriacisms in the “Arabic Qur’an” (Sidney Griffith, Washington D.C., USA – read in his absence).

The Syriac Churches in the Umayyad Period (661-750) (Mor Gregorios Yohanna Ibrahim, Aleppo, Syria)

Christian Responses to Islam in the Umayyad Period (661-750) (Dietmar W. Winkler, Salzburg, Austria)

The Contribution of Mesopotamian Christianity during the Abbasid Period (Mar Bawai Soro, California, USA – read in his absence)

The Syrian Renaissance. A Period of Inter-religious and Inter-cultural Dialogue? (Herman Teule, Nijmegen, The Netherlands).

The Personal Status of the Christians in the Ottoman Empire (1453-1923) (Mar Mikhael Al-Jamil, Rome, Italy).

Syriac Churches Encountering Islam in the Ottoman Period: Some Aspects (Martin Tamcke, Göttingen, Germany).

Christian-Muslim Relationships on the Malabar Coast (Baby Varghese, Kerala, India).

Christian Minorities in the Countries of the Middle East: A Glimpse at the Present Situation and Future Perspectives (Joseph Yacoub, Lyon, France).


TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 novembre 2007 05:16
COLLEGE OF CARDINALS: A PROFILE
By Jesús Colina

VATICAN CITY, NOV. 27, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The College of Cardinals is a representation of the Church's catholicity, Benedict XVI affirmed Monday, and the 70 countries represented by those wearing red hats is proof enough.

With the new cardinals elevated in Saturday's consistory, the College of Cardinals has 201 members. Of those, 120 could vote in a conclave to elect a Pope. Eighty-one cardinals are over the age 80, and thus no longer eligible to vote.

More than half of the cardinals are European: a total of 104, of whom 60 are possible electors.

Latin America has 34 cardinals (21 electors), while 20 come from the United States or Canada (16 electors).

From Africa come 18 cardinals (nine electors); from Asia, there are 21 (12 electors); and from Oceania, four (two electors).

Italy is historically the country with the largest number of cardinals: Currently it has 42 (21 electors). It is followed by the United States, which has 17 (13 electors). Spain has 10 cardinals (six electors); France and Brazil both have nine (six and four electors, respectively).

Continuing this list is Poland with eight cardinals (four electors) and Germany with seven (six electors). Mexico and India both have six cardinals (four and three electors, respectively). Argentina has four (two electors).

Six countries have three cardinals each: Australia, Ireland and Switzerland (one elector each); Philippines (two electors); and Colombia and Canada (3 electors each).

Great Britain, Portugal, Hungary, Ukraine, Austria, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Chile, Nigeria, Ghana, Vietnam and Korea have two cardinals each.

There are 39 cardinals from religious congregations.

Of the current cardinals, seven were elevated by Pope Paul VI, all of whom are now over the age of 80. Pope John Paul II elevated 156 of the current cardinals; 90 of them are still electors. And Benedict XVI has elevated 38 cardinals, 30 of whom are electors.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 novembre 2007 22:22
EVANGELIZING IN MONGOLIA

On Catholic identity and
the missionary uses of vodka

By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Rome
Posted on Nov 28, 2007



No preoccupation looms larger on the global Catholic stage today than Catholic identity, meaning how to identify and to reinforce what makes the church distinctive from the surrounding culture. Surprisingly enough, there may be important lessons to be learned on this subject in one of the most historically non-Catholic places on earth: the rugged steppes of Mongolia.

It is, admittedly, an improbable setting. The church arrived in Mongolia only in 1992, and to date claims just 415 Catholics. They’re served by 65 foreign missionaries, including 20 priests and one bishop. The Mongolian church, described by its bishop as a “baby church,” is just now on the cusp of producing its very first seminarian.

It could, therefore, seem a bit premature to look to Mongolia for larger Catholic lessons.

Yet listening to Bishop Wenceslao Selga Padilla, 58, a Filipino who has been in charge of the mission in Mongolia since its birth, speak in Rome Tuesday night, it seemed possible that Mongolia may be able to offer a unique perspective on broader Catholic debate about identity and evangelization: For a culture encountering Catholicism for the first time, what seems distinctive about the church to them? What is it that attracts them and impels them to dig deeper, eventually making the decision to convert?

In other words, for a population that doesn’t carry the weight of centuries of Christian history and intra-ecclesiastical debates, what is it about Catholicism that stands out and wins hearts?

For anyone accustomed to the contours of Catholic debate after the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), the answers from Mongolia may seem counter-intuitive: according to Padilla, it's liturgy, specifically the post-Vatican II style of liturgy in the vernacular and based on broad participation by the laity; and social service, especially education and relief programs aimed at the new urban poor.

Padilla said that when he conducts interviews with Mongolian converts to understand what attracted them and made them decide to join the church, most will say they first came into contact with Catholicism through one of its social programs – a school, soup kitchen, or relief center. What “hooked” them, however, was the liturgy.

“They say it’s the singing, the liturgy,” Padilla told an audience at the Oratory of St. Francis Xavier del Caravita in Rome. “They say it’s more worthwhile than what they experience in the Buddhist temple. They’re active in the prayers and in the singing, It’s not just the monks doing all the singing.”

Padilla said that even though the four parishes in Mongolia (and four parochial sub-stations) use largely Western liturgical music, it’s translated into the vernacular, and most of the liturgy now is also said using the Mongol language. That, too, he said, is a major point of entry for new converts, most of whom are young and from the middle class or below.

“We cater mostly to the young and to the very poor,” Padilla said.

In the terms of Western Catholic debate, those results may well seem counter-intuitive. Over the last quarter-century, those forces concerned with Catholic identity have sometimes argued that the church has placed too much emphasis on social service, which can be delivered by humanitarian groups without any reference to the gospel, and on liturgical reform, which has made the Catholic Mass too much like worship services of other Christian denominations. According to this view, the priority should be to cover the distinctively Catholic elements of the church’s life and spiritual mission.

What the Mongolian experience may suggest, however, is that what counts as “distinctively Catholic” is to some extent culturally relative. For Mongolians without much experience of what Vatican II called the “full, conscious and active participation” of laity in the liturgy, the reformed Catholic Mass in the vernacular language may in fact seem remarkably distinctive.

Even the fact of serving coffee, tea and cookies after Mass, Padilla said, is a departure from the normal Mongolian religious experience, and it’s an important point of initial contact for many Mongolians who attend Catholic liturgies or events for the first time.

This emphasis on participation and community may also give Catholicism an evangelizing edge over other competitors on the religious landscape. Padilla said that today there are some 70 Christian denominations operating in Mongolia, including several Evangelical and Pentecostal movements, even though Mongolia has a population of just 2.9 million, one that’s traditionally overwhelmingly Buddhist.

This welter of Christian missionaries in the country, he said, has produced a certain wariness among the Mongolian authorities.

“It can give the impression that we’re after the population on all sides,” he said. “They worry that we’re not unifying the people, but dispersing them. It’s one of the reasons the government has been suspicious.”

For that reason, Padilla said, he has repeatedly assured Mongolian officials that the Catholic church is not out to coerce people into joining the church, or to fuel social tensions.

The church’s social programs and development projects, he said, which serve a largely non-Catholic population, have helped reassure leaders in the country. Catholic efforts to launch inter-faith dialogue, especially with the Buddhists, have also helped. Padilla said the Catholic community in Mongolia seeks “cordial, friendly relations” with other religions.

Nevertheless, Padilla was also clear that the ultimate motive for those projects is to bear witness to the gospel.

“All the things we do are part and parcel of evangelization,” he said.

In brief comments after his presentation, Padilla conceded that the attractiveness of the music and other forms of active participation in the liturgy may be what brings people in the church’s door, but it won’t suffice over the long term.

“We have to give them a deeper catechism and formation,” he said. For example, Padilla said, it’s important to press Mongolians towards a deeper understanding and appreciation of the personal nature of the Christian God, as opposed to the rather impersonal and abstract deity of Buddhist spirituality.

Padilla, a member of the Congregation of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, told the story of how he got the church off the ground in Mongolia in the early 1990s – one of the few places left on earth where the Catholic presence literally has to be built from the ground up.

When he and two other missionaries from his congregation arrived in 1992, he said, they began by celebrating a weekly Mass in a hotel room, inviting foreign diplomats, staffers from NGOs, and private sector personnel to take part.

Over time, he said, some of these foreigners would bring their Mongolian friends, and that’s how the first contacts with the local population began to evolve. (Some, he conceded, showed up merely to practice their English, since that remains the lingua franca among the missionaries. Over time, he said, those who came back were drawn deeper into the Catholic experience.)

In the meantime, he said, the swelling band of missionaries (which today includes 65 men and women from 19 countries and 10 congregations) began working to open schools, shelters, soup kitchens, and other humanitarian programs. Gradually, those centers also began to introduce Mongolians to the church.

Recently, Padilla was able to open a cathedral for the fledging Catholic community in Ulaanbaatar (more commonly written Ulan Bator), the capital. Called Sts. Peter and Paul Cathedral, it’s built in the shape of a “ger,” which is a traditional Mongolian residence. It’s the first time such a structure has been put up in the country for religious purposes, Padilla said. The stained glass windows inside the cathedral were crafted by a brother from the ecumenical community of Taizé.

The process of securing permission to build the cathedral and other facilities of the church, Padilla explained, was not an easy one. Initially, he said, he ran into a brick wall of delay and suspicion from government officials.

“Some officials said that we don’t need Catholics here, that we are Buddhists,” he explained. Trying to resolve these concerns through official channels initially proved fruitless.

It was then, Padilla said, that a Belgian missionary who had served in Inner Mongolia explained to him how to get things done.

“He told me that when you’re in difficulty, the thing to do is to invite these officials to dinner and get them drinking, especially vodka,” he said.

“It worked, but it was rough. At one point, I was drunk at least once or twice a week. One time I had to leave my car behind because I was too drunk to drive … but God will forgive, and anyway I wasn’t a bishop yet!”

Over time, through such informal contacts, Padilla said, the suspiciousness about him and the church began to dissolve, and permits started to come.

In 2003, there were plans for John Paul II to visit Mongolia, which were scrubbed when a hoped-for stopover in Kazan, Russia, to return to the icon of the Madonna to Kazan to the Patriarch of Moscow did not materialize. Though to date there’s been no talk about Benedict XVI going to Mongolia, Padilla said he has a message for the pope.

“I will tell him that the baby church in Mongolia is growing up,” Padilla said.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 novembre 2007 22:54
NEW INDIAN CARDINAL REFLECTS ON NEW ROLE
by Nirmala Carvalho





Mumbai, Nov. 28 (AsiaNews) – “India is a great country and there is great hope in” it, Benedict XVI told Cardinal Oswald Gracias,
archbishop of Mumbai, during the ceremony that made him a cardinal.

Speaking to AsiaNews, the newly-appointed prelate said he was very emotional when the “Holy Father actually puts the biretta on you.” But “I realised there that I was now called to take on a new role for India, Asia and for the World.”

In his homily, "the Holy Father said ‘I am calling you to join me as men in the service of the Church.’ At that moment I understood very clearly that my vocation requires me to put myself at the service of all the people of good will in India and Asia but also in the entire Church. At that moment I rededicated my live to the service of the Church.”

Benedict XVI called upon the cardinals “to act with fortitude to the extent of spilling your blood.”

For the cardinal, “this means telling the story of Jesus, first of all by bearing witness with our own lives. In this sense, fortitude means acting in the spirit of Christ to create a new world system based on love and mutual trust. This is especially true for India, a nation characterised by a rich religious and cultural diversity which beckons us to work together and enrich one another.”

In light of the upcoming release of the next papal encyclical on hope, Cardinal Gracias made reference to it, saying that it is “quite clear how much India needs hope. The country has a rich heritage but also a tremendous future. We are making great progress in the economic, technological and educational fields. We have become a world power and need to be united.”

The country must “be conscious of the great hope God gave us. There is pain, intolerance and violence, corruption and hunger, but we must maintain the hope that we can change things, see India become a compass for Asia and the world. I have always known that our country was a land of hope and hearing it said from the Holy Father was moving.”

Before the end of his meeting with the pope, Cardinal Gracias invited him to visit India. “He looked at me and smiled without saying yes or no. Afterwards he greeted me and again gave his blessing for the whole country.”


TERESA BENEDETTA
00giovedì 29 novembre 2007 21:52
DISSIDENT PRIEST SETS OWN RULES

US Catholic Parish set to 'publicly bless'
the relationship of same-sex couples'
iopen challenge to Church teaching

By Hilary White


ST. PAUL - MINNEAPOLIS, November 28, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - St. Frances Cabrini church, of the St. Paul and Minneapolis archdiocese, has announced on their website that they are ready to "bless" homosexual partners.

The parish has published a "Statement of Reconciliation" repudiating the Church for its teaching on sexual purity and married chastity and misrepresenting these teachings as a form of "oppression."

The statement said the parish will "Publicly bless the relationships of a same sex couple after the couple completes a process of discernment similar to that completed by heterosexual couples before marriage."

The parish statement goes on to pledge that it will publish in the homosexual press their commitment to the homosexual activist agenda and to including "a gay/lesbian perspective in catechesis at all levels, including elementary school age." The parish currently runs catechesis programmes for children from ages three and up.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the pastor of the parish is Fr. Leo Tibesar who is a national leader in the anti-Catholic homosexual lobbying organisation, Dignity. Fr. Tibesar was recorded this week preaching a homily refuting Catholic teaching on sexuality and accusing those who uphold it, including bishops, Cardinals and "Evangelicals", of hypocrisy.

In May 2006, when LifeSiteNews.com revealed Fr. Tibesar's leadership role in the homosexual political movement within the Church, he was not the pastor of any parish. It was since the revelations of his involvement in the anti-Catholic campaign group that he was assigned to St. Francis Cabrini. He is also a longstanding figure in Archbishop Flynn's archdiocesan programmes preparing couples for marriage.

The parish says it "stands willing" to accept "openly gay or lesbian priests or lay ministers" despite the widely available statistics showing the high prevalence of homosexual clergy perpetrators in the Church's ongoing sexual abuse crisis.

Fr. Thomas Euteneuer, head of Human Life International, told LifeSiteNews.com that the parish's statement was "totally contrary to the Catholic faith".

"I can only say what the scriptures say, this is an abomination. The blessing of homosexual partners is an abomination and the corruption of children is a scandal," he said.

"The fact that they are placing themselves in opposition to the bishops, that they specifically cite the bishops in opposition to them, means they have placed themselves outside the communion of the Catholic Church and apostolic tradition of the Church. In fact in opposition to it."

Fr. Euteneuer explained that Catholic teaching was not a matter of arbitrary or politically motivated decisions but a "clear understanding of human sexuality passed down to us through the centuries and faithfully passed on by the Church." He added that those actively living a homosexual lifestyle separate themselves "not just from the Church but from God".

The leader of the international Catholic pro-life organization stated, "We're not talking about disordered persons but disordered desires and actions. The bishops have been very clear, and the papal teachings go back forever on this issue. I think what it comes down to is that these people worship a different god than we worship."

In his 2003 book, Anti-Catholicism in America: The Last Acceptable Prejudice, US Episcopal author and historian Philip Jenkins identified these themes as the guiding conventions of the latest wave of anti-Catholic bigotry, fuelled by the sexual and "gender identity" politics common to the American left since the sexual revolution of the 1960s.

Euteneuer said, "I agree with Jenkins and I think the other side of the coin is that we have people within our own ranks, wolves in sheep's clothing, who are not only not authentic Catholics but are working on an anti-Catholic agenda from within the Church."

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
Prominent Minneapolis-St. Paul Priest a Leader in National Homosexual Lobby Group
www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/mar/06032009.html

ON TAPE: U.S. Priest Blasts Vatican Cardinal and Archbishop over Homosexuality During Homily
www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/nov/07112602.html

Readers may contact the Archdiocese to express concerns:

Most Reverend Harry J. Flynn
Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis
226 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55102
(651) 291-4400
communications@archspm.org

Most Reverend John C. Nienstedt
Coadjutor Archbishop
Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis
226 Summit Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55102
(651) 291-4400
communications@archspm.org

TERESA BENEDETTA
00giovedì 29 novembre 2007 22:16
Jewish group concerned
for Christians in Israel

Spero News
Nov. 29, 2007



The International Jewish Committee on Interreligious Consultations has asked the State of Israel to investigate the circumstances surrounding a group of Austrian Catholic clergy who were prevented from paying their respects at the Western Wall, and take appropriate steps to prevent future incidents.

In a letter to Yitzhak Cohen, the Minister in Charge of Religious Affairs in the Office of the Prime Minister, IJCIC expressed concern over international negative impact on Israel and Jewish-Christian interfaith relations as a result of the incident.

The incident occurred when a delegation of Austrian Catholic Bishops seeking to pay their respects at the Western Wall, a remnant of the Second Holy Temple, declined to remove their crosses before entering the wall area.

"The incident could have easily been avoided with advanced planning and communication with the appropriate Christian offices in Israel, said IJCIC chairman Rabbi David Rosen. "Lamentably as a result there have been very negative and public reverberations in Christian communities internationally."

The letter urged the Israeli government to clarify the procedures that members of other faith groups must take if they wish to visit or pray at the Western Wall.

"Such action will help prevent similar incidents in the future, serve the interests of the State of Israel and maintain the progress that has been made in relations between Jews and Christians around the world."

The Western Wall is adjacent to the Temple Mount, the holiest place in Judaism, and the site of King Solomon's First Temple, the rebuilt Second Temple, and Herod the Great's renovated Temple, destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE.

IJCIC also expressed concern over the recent modification in Israel's visa policies, resulting in the withdrawal of special treatment enjoyed until now by Christian clergy serving in Israel.

The letter said the changes cause great distress to Christians in the Middle East and as a result to Christian communities and authorities around the world. "We ask that you and your colleagues in the Israeli government take these issues seriously and attend to them as soon as possible."

"We raise these issues in the interest of creating respect and better understanding between Jews and Christians throughout the world. The progress of this relationship has a profound impact on the wellbeing of Jewish communities as well as on the image of the State of Israel internationally as a country that protects the religious rights of all its citizens," the letter said.


=====================================================================

I am glad this Jewish group has the good sense to do what it is doing. I feel guilty because this was one of those items I came across and meant to post but failed to do.

The Israeli action against the Austrian bishops was simply dumb and outrageous. In what way can the symbol of Jesus Christ be offensive or out of place or otherwise inappropriate anywhere if it is part of what a Christian wears? The bishops weren't going to plant a crucifix at the Wailing Wall. They were 'tourists' above the ordinary cut, being bishops.

Chances are every Christian tourist, or Catholic at least, who comes to the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem, is bound to be carrying some symbol of the faith with him. How can you help it if you are in Jerusalem? I paid my respects at the Wall the first time, laden with all kinds of little purchases of prayer books and images, oil and holy water, votive candles and rosaries, from Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the Church of Mary's Dormition and the Church in the Mount of Olives. I was not aware there were any 'religious police' around - I thought only Saudi Arabia has those! Well, the next time I get the chance, I will be sure to slip a little crucifix into the Wall!

Would they have dared ask John Paul II adn his entourage to take off their crosses before they visited the Wailing Wall in 2000?


TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 4 dicembre 2007 12:14
NOW, MOSCOW HAS A NEW OUTRAGEOUS DEMAND!

Abolish Catholic dioceses
and problems are solved, says Kirill

The head of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations
wants the Catholic Church in Russia to turn back the clock to 2002.
by Daniil Dudochkin




Moscow, Dec. 3 (AsiaNews) – How do you solve problems between the Holy See and the Moscow Patriarchate? Abolish existing Catholic dioceses in Russia. Is this the harebrained idea of some dreamy visionary? No, it isn’t.

Despite today’s widespread support for religious freedom, Metropolitan Kirill of Smolensk and Kaliningrad, head of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations, wants to see Catholic diocese abolished.

“We shall never recognise them and will always dispute the presence of ordinary Catholic dioceses in the territory of Russia and consider it a challenge to our common idea of sticking to a territorial principle of Church administrature,” said Kirill in his address to an international forum on “Local Church and Canonic Territory: Canonic, Juridical and Interfaith Aspects” held in Moscow last Saturday. The Apostolic Nuncio to Moscow, Mgr Antonio Mennini, was also present.

For the Orthodox prelate, the development of any dialogue between the Moscow Patriarchate and the Catholic Church depends on the Vatican’s readiness to confirm that a bishop’s jurisdiction must conform to the principle of Canonic territory and will therefore modify the status of Catholic dioceses in Russia, replacing them with apostolic administratures.

For Kirill the decision taken by John Paul II in 2002 to create four dioceses in Russia, was “a mistake, which indeed damages the Orthodox-Catholic dialogue and puts off a possibility of achieving our common aims.”

In short, he wants to turn back the clock, with the status of dioceses “changed and brought back to the former level of apostolic administratures.”

The hierarch tried to explain away counter-arguments which allege that the Russian Orthodox Church in Europe has its dioceses set up on the same principle as the Catholic dioceses in Russia in what the Moscow Patriarchate recognises as the canonical territory of the Catholic Church.

“The dioceses of the Moscow Patriarchate in the Diaspora are not ordinary, nor are they connected to local jurisdiction. They were established to provide pastoral care for people in Diaspora, and do not have defined borders. In a certain sense, they are unusual dioceses as we have always stressed in our dialogue with the Catholics,” he said.

“If there was a notion of apostolic administrature in the Orthodox Church, the dioceses of the Moscow Patriarchate in Europe would be called that way. [. . .] The conflict comes from the fact that we do not understand why an appropriate term was changed to one that is inappropriate.”

There has been no response so far by either the nuncio or the archbishop of the Mother of God archdiocese in Moscow, Mgr Paolo Pezzi.

Among Russian Catholics reactions were altogether negative. Many point out that “Catholic dioceses have existed in Russia since the Middle Ages. The archdiocese of Minsk-Mohilev for instance existed from the 18th to the 20th century. Why should we not have normal structures?” they insist.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 4 dicembre 2007 12:21
New Archbishop of Guangzhou:
"In China the Church is One and Catholic'






Guangzhou, Dec. 4 (AsiaNews) – The Catholic Church, even in China is “one, holy, Catholic and apostolic”. This was underlined by the new archbishop of Guangzhou [the city is better known abroad as Canton], Msgr. Joseph Gan Junqiu, minutes before he gave his parting blessing to the faithful who had gathered in Sacred Heart Cathedral to participate in his ordination.

Local sources who took part in the celebrations described the event to AsiaNews:



The solemn mass took place this morning in the “House of Stone”, the great cathedral that lies in the centre of the city. Press and faithful from other diocese were not allowed attend due to “lack of space”.

About 900 people participated, each given an admission pass with the number of the pew assigned to them as well as their position within the same pew.

A 'massive' police presence as well as members of the Patriotic Association of Chinese Catholics (PA) were there, “to keep an eye on all of the people gathered in the square for the duration of the mass”.

[AsiaNews note: The PA is a government organism not recognised by the Holy See, which interferes in the life of the church and tries to impose its own bishops on diocese without Vatican consensus.]

Despite this climate, Msgr. Gan took advantage of the moment in which the congregation exchanged the sign of peace to come down from the altar, leave the cathedral and make his way to a room close by the Church, where other Catholics were following the mass via a giant screen. There he embraced the only foreigners who were present, as a sign of communion with the Universal Church.

Catholics from the Archdiocese of Guangzhou place a lot of hope in their new pastor. They tell AsiaNews, that he “has an open heart and mind and is held in high esteem by many people. He does not love compromise, but he knows how to find balance there where it is often difficult to put tolerance into practise. All of this costs him dearly and shows his deep love for his people and for the Church, which is universal. We have been without a pastor for far too long and this grace from God has made us very, very happy”.

Msgr. Gan was elected archbishop in November 2006. Immediately after his election, he received Holy See approval and communicated this to the local faithful.

Because of obstructionism by the PA who did not view this public declaration of loyalty to the Pope kindly, his ordination was blocked until today. It did not appreciate Father Gan's pledging allegiance to the Pope after his election in late November 2006.

In this particular case the CPCA tried to impose its own choice for ordaining bishops whom the candidate has found unworthy. Mgr John Fang Xingyao of Linyi was to preside at the ceremony along with Mgr Joseph Liao Hongqing of Meizhou and Mgr Paul Su Yongda of Zhanjiang.

ANOTHER BISHOP ORDAINED YESTERDAY
BUT IS SILENT ABOUT VATICAN APPROVAL

Meanwhile on Friday Mgr Francis Lu Shouwang was ordained the new official bishop of Yichang, (Hubei, central China). The new prelate did not publicly state whether his appointment was accepted by the Vatican or not, but AsiaNews sources confirm that he was approved by the Holy See.

The bishops who ordained him were Mgr Louis Yu Runshen, official bishop of Hanzhong (Shaanxi); Mgr Zhao Fengchang, bishop of Liao Cheng (Yang Gu, Shandong); and Mgr Su Yongda, bishop of Zhanjiang (Guangdong). No underground bishop was present at the ceremony.

Instead there were many officials from the CPCA and the Bishops’ Council, including Wang Zuoan, deputy director of the Religious Affairs Bureau and Zhou Ning, a director of the Central United Front as well as representatives of the Hubei United Front and government leaders from Yichang, Enshizhou and Jingmen.

Right after the mass the new bishop pledged to “guide everyone, priests, nuns, seminarians and faithful, in observing the laws of the state, safeguard national unity and social stability, and make his own contribution to build a harmonious socialist society.”

Many faithful in the underground Church told AsiaNews that these ordinations, while they may have been legitimised, fall short of total obedience to what is laid out in the Pope’s Letter to Chinese Catholics.

In it Benedict XVI calls on legitimised bishops to announce and bring “into the public domain at the earliest opportunity” (n.8) their legitimation by the Holy See. Some of the newly-ordained bishops are hiding instead their possible approval. For this reason the Pope calls on legitimised bishops “to provide unequivocal and increasing signs of full communion with the Successor of Peter” (ibid).

According to the underground Church this means they should openly distance themselves from the CPCA, an organisation which the Vatican considers “incompatible with Catholic doctrine” (n. 7).

Lastly, the government has blocked the ordination of the new coadjutor bishop of the autonomous province of Ningxia, in central China. The bishop ordinary, John Liu Jingshan, said that the ceremony for his successor, Fr Joseph Li Jing, “was moved by the government for some reason. Perhaps it will take place on December 8, the feast day of the Immaculate Conception.” This future bishop also received the papal mandate.



Here is AP's later report:


China Catholic Church ordains bishop
By WILLIAM FOREMAN

GUANGZHOU, China, Dec. 4 (AP) - Dozens of police guarded a Catholic church in China on Tuesday as a priest supported by the Vatican was ordained as a bishop — a move that might mark a further easing of tensions between Beijing and the Holy See.

Security forces used metal barricades to block off the entrance of the Sacred Heart Cathedral in Guangzhou, a booming southern city once known as Canton.

Only people with special red badges were allowed to attend the ordination of Bishop Joseph Gan Junqiu, and most of the followers arrived in tour buses and were steered clear of the media.

Several past ordinations have upset the Vatican because the Chinese Catholic Church promoted priests who did not have the pope's blessing. The Communist government, which cut ties with the Holy See in 1951, has said that the Vatican should not decide who becomes a bishop in China's official Catholic Church.

But Tuesday's ordination was different because Gan had the Vatican's approval. The 43-year-old priest, who has studied in Belgium and France, has publicly declared his fidelity to the pope, as Pope Benedict XVI asked of Chinese bishops in a letter to the Chinese faithful earlier this year.

After a ceremony that lasted more than two hours, Gan emerged from the Sacred Heart Cathedral, the largest dual-steepled Gothic stone church in China. Dressed in a flowing white robe and tall bishop's hat, Gan briefly mingled with clergy and the faithful on the front steps of the church, which locals call the "she shi," or the "stone chamber" because it is made mostly of granite.

Gan did not speak to reporters, but a senior church official, Lu Guocun, said he was glad that the new bishop had the Vatican's support.

"This is really good news," said Lu, a vice chairman of the Catholic Patriotic Association of China. "We think that if the bishop that we choose can improve relations with the Vatican, then that's a good thing."

But Lu added he was unsure whether Gan's ordination will have any effect on ties with the Vatican. He said that fell into the realm of diplomacy.

In Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang told reporters that while China wants to improve relations with the Vatican, it must "take into consideration the history and reality of the Chinese Catholic Church."

Hong Kong's Cardinal Joseph Zen, one of the most influential Roman Catholic figures in Asia, doubted Gan's ordination would lead to a major breakthrough in Beijing-Vatican relations.

"There have been many ordinations of bishops who have had the blessing of the Holy See," Zen told The Associated Press in Hong Kong, where the Roman Catholic Church is allowed to operate because the Chinese city enjoys a semiautonomous status.

But Zen added that last year there were at least three cases of bishops being appointed by China without the Vatican's blessing. He said that was an anomaly and there has been renewed consultation between the two sides about appointments.

"Now, I am pleased to see we are getting back to the trend of previous years," he said.

AP correspondents Cassie Biggs in Hong Kong and Audra Ang in Beijing contributed to this report.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 4 dicembre 2007 12:31
Israel, Vatican close to historic accord,
says Israeli ambassador to Holy See



VATICAN CITY, Dec. 4 (AFP) - Israel and the Vatican are close to concluding a historic bilateral accord on the legal and financial status of the Roman Catholic Church in Israel, the country's ambassador said Monday.

"We are very close to the conclusion of this historic accord," Oded Ben Hur was quoted as saying by Italy's ANSA news agency at a debate organised by a pontifical university in Rome.

The text under negotiation is the economic section of the fundamental agreement on relations the Vatican and Israel signed in December 1993.

"About 85 percent of the text has been examined and approved by the representatives of Israel and the Vatican," said the ambassador.

Negotiations on the text resumed in 2004 after a 10-year hiatus, and Ben Hur said the next round of talks will take place on December 13 in Israel.

The two sides are seeking to hammer out an agreement concerning the legal and tax status of Church property in Israel and the commercial activities of Christian communities there.

The Vatican is seeking tax-exempt status for Church institutions.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 4 dicembre 2007 17:14
VATICAN NEWS TODAY FROM VIS


PROTECT THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM OF ALL BELIEVERS

VATICAN CITY, DEC 4, 2007 (VIS) - On November 29, Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, secretary for Relations with States, addressed the 15th Ministerial Council of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). The event was held in Madrid, Spain, from November 29 and 30, and was attended by foreign ministers of the 56 member States of the OSCE.

Addressing the gathering in English, Archbishop Mamberti noted that in "the fight against terrorism, it is imperative to protect critical energy infrastructure from attack. It will also be important, on the issue of environmental protection, for the organization to support the various initiatives concerning water management, thus contributing to cooperation, stability and the equitable and sustainable development of each country."

After highlighting how the OSCE is called "to create an area of freedom and the rule of law," the leader of the Holy See delegation indicated that to this end it must "ceaselessly promote the dignity of the human person and defend the intrinsic rights and values of all men and women. In this respect, I also believe," he added, "that it is essential that we continue to oppose human trafficking and the sexual exploitation of children."

"If the OSCE is to promote human dignity in an integral way, it must also effectively combat intolerance and discrimination against Christians, Jews, Muslims and members of other religions. In fact, this question has moved up to become an important political and security theme. Religious discrimination can only effectively be addressed if all religions are equally respected and protected."

The secretary for Relations with States recalled the fact that the European Parliament "has recently adopted a resolution deploring various episodes which endanger the very existence of Christian and other religious communities. The OSCE can be rightly proud that it was one of the first organizations to raise the alarm concerning discrimination against Christians, but it must remain alert. Christians continue to suffer from prejudice, stereotypes, discrimination and violence. Disengagement from these problems cannot be an option!

"We must not hide behind the principle of 'consensus' in order to avoid effective action," he added, "and neither should we be satisfied with blanket condemnations. Rather this consensus should be a catalyst for action to protect fundamental freedoms, and, above all, the religious freedom of every believer and of each religious community."


HOLY SEE DELEGATION AT CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE

VATICAN CITY, DEC 4, 2007 (VIS) - The 13th session of the conference of States parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is being held on the Indonesian island of Bali from December 3 to 14.

A communique made public yesterday afternoon affirms that the Holy See will be present at the Bali meeting with a delegation led by Archbishop Leopoldo Girelli, apostolic nuncio to Indonesia, and composed of Msgr. Andrew Thanya- anan Vissanu, nunciature counsellor in Jakarta, and of three local experts from the Philippines and Indonesia: Fr. Benito B. Tuazon, Fr. Alexius Andang Listya Binawan S.J., and Vera Wenny Setijawati.

"Given that the sessions of the Convention on Climate Change are held once a year in various countries," the communique reads, "the Holy See is usually represented at such meetings with a delegation led by the apostolic nuncio and made up of experts from the area, so as to take advantage of local resources and to achieve a broader and more differentiated vision of the questions being examined."


ECONOMIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN HOLY SEE AND ALBANIA

VATICAN CITY, DEC 4, 2007 (VIS) - On Monday, December 3, the Holy See and the Republic of Albania signed an agreement concerning certain economic and fiscal matters.

The agreement, signed in the office of the Albanian minister of finance in Tirana, comes in the wake of the accord between the two countries concluded in 2002, and creates a juridical framework for the fiscal treatment of ecclesiastical institutions recognized as non-profit juridical entities. In particular, it regulates the fiscal status of Catholic Church organizations in Albania, the economic administration of such structures, and the contributory- insurance scheme for the non-Albanian religious and lay personnel who serve in them."

The agreement, which will come into effect following the exchange of the instruments of ratification, was signed for the Holy See by Archbishop Giovanni Bulaitis, apostolic nuncio in Tirana and, for the republic of Albania, by Ridvan Bode, finance minister.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 5 dicembre 2007 02:08
Archbishop of Guangzhou
against materialist threat




Guangzhou, Dec. 4 (AsiaNews) – Guangzhou is a diocese with committed members, a lively community that faces great challenges in the future like too few vocations and widespread materialism which grips young people and adults alike, this according to the newly-ordained archbishop, Mgr Joseph Gan Junqiu.

The prelate, who spoke in an interview with AsiaNews, was ordained this morning in the famous “House of Stone,” the big Sacred Heart Cathedral in downtown Guangzhou.


Mons. Gan with supporters after his episcopal ordination today.

Monsignor Gan was elected archbishop in November 2006. Soon afterwards he was informed of the Holy See’s approval, which he then relayed to his faithful. But as a result of obstructionism by the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association, which did not like his statement of loyalty to the Pope, his ordination was blocked till today.


Your Excellency, what type of diocese is Guangzhou?
The diocese of Guangzhou is very big with 40,000 members, 15,000 in the city alone. We have three seminarians and three priests who are studying theology, plus a few nuns who help out in the parishes. Here in the city it is me and a parish priest. At present we have few vocations, mostly men. Most men and women religious come from outside.

Since 1999 we have had about 100 baptisms a year. The number of catechumens is up, especially when the cathedral re-opened to the public after upgrading work. Many people come out of curiosity for the building, then stop.

The community has many faces with a strong foreign presence, especially Nigerians and Filipinos.

Every Sunday we have six different masses at different times depending on the language: Mandarin, Korean, Cantonese and English.


Can you give us a portrait of your community?
About 80 per cent of the community is made up of middle aged and young people. Many are university students. In some faculties there are some priests who teach English and help spread the word about the Church.



In the early eighties with the revival of religious life many rural migrants came to church, but now we need Christians who can bear witness to the faith, who can train. The community is in any event quite lively. For instance we have teenagers and adults under 30 who have set up support groups for the elderly.

But there are also young entrepreneurs who volunteer. One of them impressed me when I found out that he talks to his workers about the Gospel. Each summer we also organise a period of preparation to the sacraments for adolescents in each parish.


What are the main challenges of the moment?
Secularisation and materialism are the greatest challenges. Guangzhou is the capital of China’s richest province. The race for money at any cost can be seen every day in how people behave. In the end young people feel society’s emptiness and seek positive values. Even party officials acknowledge that there is a lack in values and spirituality.


Here's a story about the Guangzhou Cathedral that goes back to February 2007, but, making allowances for the date, it is still informative.




Guangzhou’s Sacred Heart Cathedral
to reopen


Guangzhou, Feb. 8 (AsiaNews) – Guangzhou’s historic Sacred Heart Cathedral, the only granite Gothic church in mainland China, is scheduled to reopen on February 9, after more than two years of renovation work, paid almost entirely from the coffers of the provincial Communist government.

The occasion will be marked by a liturgical celebration tomorrow morning, at 8:30 am, in the presence of numerous faithful as well as officials from the municipal and provincial governments.

The cathedral is located in downtown Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong province, and is commonly known as the Shishi or Stone House Church ,because its walls and pillars were built with large granite blocks. Over the years it has become a major point of interest for Chinese and foreign worshippers and tourists.

Full-scale renovation began in July 2004. It included replacing the roof, cleaning and repairing the granite walls, and reinstalling a mechanical clock and bronze bells in the two bell towers. The lighting, sound system and furniture were upgraded and more greenery was planted in the church compound. Its stained glass windows were replaced with new ones from the Philippines. They depict Bible stories and saints.

Beside the altar are a pair of windowpanes portraying Italian Jesuit Father Matteo Ricci (1552-1610) and Catholic Chinese imperial official Paul Xu Guangqi (1562-1633), Ricci’s first baptised Chinese.

A local Catholic points out however that the windows “have a major flaw. Their titles are in English and not in Chinese. It is a real pity.” Another worshipper is more philosophical. “It is actually nice to think that for these windows the Churches of China and the Philippines got in touch with one another.”

The Shishi is one of China’s most beautiful Catholic buildings. Earth from Rome and Jerusalem was used in the foundations as a symbol of the faith’s universality and its link to Rome.

A local clergyman told AsiaNews that the Cathedral’s new appearance will “help in evangelising because many people who saw the renovation on TV will be drawn to such an important historic place.”

The Church is also a focal point for the city’s expatriate community. Many foreigners have in fact settled in Guangdong province, China’s wealthiest region. Sunday masses will be in Mandarin Chinese, Cantonese, English and Korean.

As a way to show its openness and generosity, the city government has contributed 21 million yuan (US$ 2.7 million), about 80 per cent of the total renovation cost of 26 million yuan. The diocese, despite a tight budget, contributed 3 million yuan and raised another 2 million from Catholics. As way to thank donors a commemorative plate in their honour will be unveiled inside the church.

In 1996, China's State Council listed the cathedral as a national historical monument. Construction began in 1863 and was completed in 1888, 25 years later. It was inspired by Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, but the architects incorporated two additional 60-metre-tall bell towers on either side. With a floor area of 2,754 square metres, the Guangzhou cathedral is one of the largest Gothic churches in China.

The church suffered severe damage during the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-1945) and the Civil War between Kuomintang (nationalist party) and Communist troops.

During the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), some red guards destroyed stone pillars and all the fixtures in the cathedral such as altars, furniture and statues of saints. The church was then used as a warehouse. But it returned to its original vocation after Deng Xiaoping came to power in 1979.

On the wall behind the main altar are traces of the Cultural Revolution, which are being preserved as a testament to China's history. After bricks had been removed and the wall washed, huge slogans in red paint were revealed such as “Long live Chairman Mao” and the “Working class must exercise leadership of everything.”

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 5 dicembre 2007 12:17
Catholic coloring book warns US kids
of pedophile priests




NEW YORK, Dec. 5 (AFP) - New York's Roman Catholic Church is trying a novel approach to alert children to the danger of being sexually assaulted by a priest, with an abuse-themed coloring book, officials said Tuesday.



Being Friends, Being Safe, Being Catholic, was distributed earlier this year to several hundred schools in the New York area as part of the church's Safe Environment Program, a spokeswoman from the city's Archdiocese said.

One image in the book features a guardian angel hovering over an altar boy with a priest lurking in the background.

"For safety's sake, a child and an adult shouldn't be alone in a closed room together," the angel counsels. In another, the angel warns of a sexual predator attempting to chat with a child over the Internet.

David Clohessy, head of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, cautiously welcomed the initiative, but said it did not go far enough.

"We applaud the intent but worry a bit about the approach... it does still feel like almost every step taken by the hierarchy is one that's been prompted by external pressure," he told AFP.

The scale of child abuse by priests remained hidden in the United States for years until the Archbishop of Boston confessed in 2002 to protecting a priest he knew had sexually abused young members of his church.

According to the group "Bishop Accountability," some 3,000 priests out of the 42,000 across the country have since been denounced, some of whom have been investigated and convicted.

Since the scandal broke, US Catholic authorities have paid out close to 2.8 billion dollars in damages, forcing many dioceses to sell off their assets.

The 22-paeg comic book can be seen on
www.archny.org/media/files-sep/SEP%20Coloring%20Book%20Ages%2010%20and%20u...

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 5 dicembre 2007 12:38
Global concerns dominate meeting
of Pope, cardinals

By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Rome


There is nothing new here that Allen has not reported in his columns earlier. The story appears in this week's issue of National Ctholic Reporter, the magazine he writes for. The issue is dedicated to advocating women priests, including the cover story.


A Nov. 24 consistory in which Pope Benedict XVI created 23 new cardinals, including two Americans, reflected several key global concerns of the Catholic church, even as church officials struggled to respond to charges that the makeup of the College of Cardinals does not represent the global Catholic population.


Cardinals Sandri and Delly.

In a consistory without obvious new papal candidates, in many ways the star was Patriarch Emmanuel III Delly, head of the Chaldean Catholic church in Iraq. Delly drew the loudest cheers and longest lines of well-wishers of all the new cardinals, in an expression of concern for violence in Iraq and the decimation of the country’s Christian community.

Delly was the lone cardinal singled out by Pope Benedict during his homily at the consistory ceremony.

“These brothers and sisters of ours in the faith are experiencing in their own flesh the dramatic consequences of a long-lasting conflict, and are living today in an extremely fragile and delicate political situation,” the pope said. “By calling the patriarch of the Chaldean church to enter into the College of Cardinals, I wanted to express my spiritual closeness and affection for this population.”

Twenty years ago, Iraq had an estimated Christian population of 1.4 million, one of the largest in the Muslim world. Today, estimates are that at least one-quarter, and perhaps one-half, of Iraq’s Christians have fled. Those figures do not take into account Iraqi Christians who are internally displaced.

On Nov. 25, Benedict also called upon Catholics worldwide to join a day of prayer set aside by the American bishops for the Nov. 27 Annapolis conference on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. A Vatican delegation took part in that session.

Another drive for global reconciliation was behind a Nov. 23 business meeting of the entire College of Cardinals with the pope, only the second such gathering since Benedict took office in April 2005. The daylong discussion was devoted largely to ecumenism, meaning the search for unity among the divided Christian churches.

Cardinal Walter Kasper, a German who serves as president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, urged Catholics to renew their commitment to unity.

“We should not offend the sensibilities of others or seek to discredit them,” Kasper said. “We should not point the finger at what our ecumenical partners are not, and what they lack. Rather, we should give witness to the richness and the beauty of our faith in a positive and welcoming way. We expect the same approach from the others.”

Several cardinals argued that practical cooperation on social, political and cultural questions, rather than new theological breakthroughs, offer the greatest ecumenical promise.

Cardinals Audrys Juozas Backis of Lithuania and Janis Pujats of Latvia, for example, stressed that a common battle against secularization offers fertile ecumenical terrain with the Orthodox.

Yet for all the global character of both the discussion and symbolism, observers could not help but note that Benedict’s picks cemented the European and North American dominance of the College of Cardinals. Two-thirds of the cardinals come from the Global North, while two-thirds of the 1.1 billion Catholics in the world today are in the Global South - Latin America, Africa and Asia.

The Vatican’s secretary of state, Italian Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, argued the day before the consistory that the makeup of the college is actually representative - but of clergy, not average Catholics.

“If one considers only in a mathematical sense the relationship between the faithful and the cardinals, it could perhaps seem unequal,” Bertone said. “But if one looks more carefully at the data on the distribution of priests and bishops in the world, the proportions appear more balanced.”

Bertone’s comments came in an interview with L’Avvenire, the official newspaper of the Italian bishops’ conference. Bertone was asked to respond to articles in NCR and the Italian news agency ANSA suggesting that Latin America, Africa and Asia are underrepresented.

The L’Avvenire piece noted that the two countries with the largest number of cardinal-electors, Italy and the United States, are also those with the largest numbers of bishops and priests. Italy has more than 51,000 priests and over 500 bishops, while the United States has over 45,000 priests and more than 430 bishops.

The two new American cardinals are John Foley of Philadelphia, currently serving in the Vatican as the pro-grand master of the Equestrian Order of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher, and Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston.

Foley and DiNardo held a brief news conference at the North American College, the American seminary in Rome, after the Nov. 24 consistory ceremony. The avuncular Foley thanked the media for largely positive coverage of his 23-year Vatican career.

“It’s nice to be canonized without the inconvenience of dying!” he said.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 5 dicembre 2007 12:54
Venezuela's Bishops Keep Promoting Peace

CARACAS, Venezuela, DEC. 4, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The Church will continue promoting peace in Venezuela, confirmed the bishops of the country after President Hugo Chávez's proposed constitutional reforms were defeated in a referendum.

Archbishop Ubaldo Santana Sequera of Maracaibo told the newspaper El Universal on Monday that the Church will continue calling "for the paths of peace," and promoting encounters of dialogue and understanding.

Chávez lost a constitutional referendum Sunday that would have enabled him to remain in power for life and move Venezuela closer toward a socialist state.

The prelate said he was "very proud" of the "excellent democratic conduct shown by" the Venezuelan people.

"Yesterday's results opens a new opportunity in Venezuela so that those who shape the different sectors of life of the country can work together and discover paths of mutual collaboration, in addition to looking for ways to overcome confusion and to work for reconciliation and peace," said Archbishop Santana Sequera.

The archbishop of Maracaibo acknowledged that it is necessary to sustain a climate of hope, to reject violent confrontation and to begin a new phase of dialogue in mutual respect.


Questa è la versione 'lo-fi' del Forum Per visualizzare la versione completa clicca qui
Tutti gli orari sono GMT+01:00. Adesso sono le 15:35.
Copyright © 2000-2024 FFZ srl - www.freeforumzone.com