NEWS ABOUT BENEDICT

Versione Completa   Stampa   Cerca   Utenti   Iscriviti     Condividi : FacebookTwitter
Pagine: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ..., 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, [163], 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, ..., 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265
benefan
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 05:18


In reply to a number of messages received about the 'difficulty' of navigating within the Forum, I hope this helps:

FOR NEW VISITORS TO THE FORUM: To navigate within the page you are now on, scroll up or down as needed.
To see preceding entries in NEWS ABOUT BENEDICT, Click on 'Previous page', above right.
To get to other topic threads of the English section, click on the 'envelop' above right, tagged 'Fans speaking English' -
it will get you to the board with all the topic threads available in the section.
On that board, to get to the latest page containing the most recent entries on the topic you choose,
click on 'Last' in the parentheses indicating page numbers right after the subject title,
Once you get to that page, proceed as above.
















Jumping into the fray, the New York Times seeks out the usual suspects to comment on the latest papal controversy.


Healing Schism, Pope Risks Another

By RACHEL DONADIO
The New York Times
January 26, 2009

ROME — A day after Pope Benedict XVI said he would revoke the excommunications of four schismatic bishops, including one who has denied the Holocaust, concern about the pope’s decision extended into the Vatican itself.

Cardinal Walter Kasper, the director of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and the liaison for Vatican-Jewish relations, said Sunday that he had not been consulted. “It was a decision of the pope,” the cardinal said in a telephone interview.

That Benedict apparently did not widely discuss a matter that has provoked anger among Jewish groups and liberal Catholics was not out of character, however. It was just the latest example of how the pope is increasingly focused on internal doctrinal issues and seemingly unaware of how they might resonate in the larger world.

As such, it perfectly captured the theological aspirations — and political shortcomings — of his four-year-old papacy.

In 2007, Benedict approved broader use of the Latin Mass, a reform sought by the same traditionalists he has now reinstated, but one seen by many in the church as divisive. The year before, the pope angered Muslims when he cited a medieval scholar who said that Islam brought things “evil and inhuman,” and he was seemingly ill prepared for the repercussions. He later apologized.

Again this weekend, a doctrinal question exploded into a global polemic. Benedict’s decision to extend an olive branch to the four men was apparently born from a deep personal and theological desire to heal the only schism in the Roman Catholic Church in a century.

On Saturday, he said he would welcome back into the fold the four members of a sect founded in opposition to the reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. The bishops are members of the St. Pius X Society, which was founded in 1970 by a French archbishop, Marcel Lefebvre, in opposition to Vatican II reforms. They were excommunicated by Pope John Paul II in 1988 after Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated them in unsanctioned ceremonies.

The most contentious of the four is the British-born Bishop Richard Williamson, who in a recent television interview said he thought the “historical evidence” was against six million Jews dying in Nazi gas chambers.

Some saw the pope’s decision as part of a trend, or at least an indication of his priorities.

“There is obviously a theological strategy, but the repercussions on the public opinion field beyond the church are obviously only secondary in priority,” said Mordechay Lewy, the Israeli ambassador to the Vatican.

The move baffled Alberto Melloni, a professor of church history and the director of the liberal Catholic John XXIII Foundation for Religious Science in Bologna, which produced a history of Vatican II. “What is very inexplicable to me is how it’s possible to not calculate the consequences. This is abnormal,” he said.

The Society of St. Pius X does not appear to have issued any public statements on Bishop Williamson’s views on the Holocaust. But the society has never been welcoming toward other faiths.

Jewish leaders said the pope’s decision was a setback. “It’s a very serious situation,” said Riccardo di Segni, the chief rabbi of Rome. He said the tenets of Lefebvrism were as worrisome as Bishop Williamson’s personal views.

Rabbi di Segni said he did not know what the next chapter would bring. “I don’t know what kind of resolution there can be at this point,” he said.

In a public statement, the Vatican said Saturday that the revocation was a step toward full reconciliation with the Lefebvrists and that further talks would seek to resolve the “open questions.”

Other liberal critics said the pope’s decision to welcome the Lefebvrists showed that he was more willing to embrace schismatic conservatives than wayward leftists.

In his days as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Benedict censured many left-leaning prelates, including ones adhering to the Marxist-inflected Liberation Theology movement popular in Latin America.

“I would be happy if the pope would be for reconciliation, especially also for people on the progressive side,” said Hans Küng, a professor of theology at the University of Tübingen, Germany, who has for decades been Benedict’s most formidable critic on the left. A Catholic priest, Father Küng was forbidden by the church to teach theology.

The revocation seemed to move the papacy further toward intellectual concerns rather than the daily lives of Catholics. Under Benedict, the church “risks becoming a Vatican hierarchy disincarnated from faith,” said Ezio Mauro, the editor of the center-left daily La Repubblica, who writes on church-state issues.

Father Küng agreed. Benedict “does not see that he is alienating himself from the larger part of the Catholic Church and Christianity,” he said. “He doesn’t see the real world. He only sees the Vatican world.”


*********************************************************************


First of all, the Times headline is stupid. What other schism is risked here? The schism of the progressives? They never had the balls to break away all these decades, or alternatively, they feel so cocksure they will prevail within the Church - 'we are the Church' - that they feel if they only stand their ground, they will! It can't be the Jews, who are the only other party interested in this issue, since they are not Christians, so there is no question of schism.

I do worry that this could be a far greater PR incident than Regensburg ever was - simply because the Jews dominate Western media, and the most strident opinion makers, who are mostly liberals/progressives, only have contempt for traditionalists of the Church - whom they consider and call 'fundamentalists' derogatively - whereas they could be most tolerant and even share the causes of Islamist fundamentalists.

We have seen what liberal media can do to someone they dislike in the merciless savaging of George W. Bush, who knew to turn the other cheek. I very much fear that our Pope may be the next narrowly focused target of the liberal derangement syndrome against anyone they dislike.

And the government of Israel could well aggravate the syndrome by withdrawing their invitation for him to visit the Holy Land.

As for Cardinal Kasper and other Curial officials who seem to be against the Pope's decision, the decree was rumored in the press for some time, and reported 'knowledgeably' by two of the most reliable Italian Vaticanistas a few days before the decree finally came out.

If they really felt so concerned about possible negative repercussions for the Pope, did they at least try to make their reservations known to him as soon as those rumors came out? A loyal co-worker would do so, if only for the record, but especially if one had reason to believe there were bound to be unintended consequences.

Soon, Benedict XVI will be painted by the derangement-afflicted as someone who has succeeded is alienating other world religions in succession - first the Muslims, now the Jews. Who next - the Hindus? The atheists are already in full battle mode against him...

Media will have a field day rehashing all the previous PR 'gaffes' and 'mistakes' that have kept them rapping the Pope on the knuckles as one would a stubborn schoolboy who never learns, adding on their derision for a Vatican that ventures into YouTube but does not seem to grasp the more fundamental CYA rule of PR - and I find media gloating and Schadenfreude perhaps the most unbearable torture of all! (That and the inevitable and oh-so-unwarranted and even false comparisons with his predecessor, as the Jews are forever doing.)

Perhaps Fr. Lombardi in his statements about the Williamson issue could have been more explicit and insistent about explaining to outsiders exactly what excommunication is - as a canonical discipline for actions specified in canon law, which does not, unfortunately, provide against anti-Semitism, bigotry and ignorance. (It's bad enough that the usual MSM stories are unable to compress the history of the FSSPX schism in an accurate way that is also comprehensible to the casual reader, Catholic or not.)

Perhaps someone in the Vatican who was privy to the developments that led to the Pope's decision (Cardinals Castrillon and Re, most definitely) might have remembered to recommend as a precaution that Mons. Fellay should be requested to simultaneously issue a disclaimer about Williamson and an apology for the unnecessary anguish and outrage that his remarks have meant to Jewish people.

[It would not have hurt any - and it would have pre-empted much of the bitter reaction from the Jews - if the announcement of the 'excom' revocation had also been accompanied by a statement saying explicitly that the canonical act doe not in anway mean that the Church, the Vatican or the Pope condone one of the bishops' anti-Holocaust snetiments, and it can only reject such statements - instead of simply assuming and trusting that the rest of the world - and the media - would understand that of course, the Pope finds Williamson's statements unacceptable!]

We can't get into the mind of the Holy Father, but he will have considerations that anyone who is not Pope cannot possibly have the slightest inkling about - in the same way that some crucial decision-making considerations by an actual US President include factors that a mere presidential candidate cannot even imagine.

We must trust the Holy Father's wisdom even as we cower in dread over what he might be in for. He will be sustained by the Spirit which dwells in the Vicar of Christ, but we must also add our prayers - and project all our love towards him.

I won't waste my bile for now against the usual suspects dredged up by the Times and its like-minded media colleagues as 'character witnesses' ('character assassins' more like it) against the Pope. I see the rogues' gallery now includes Melloni and Di Segni, with Politi and Mancuso missing from the Italian line-up this go-around, and Fr. Reese and David Gibson on the US side. Mauro is a stand-in for his boss Scalfari, the secular 'Pope' of La Repubblica.


TERESA

maryjos
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 13:45
To Rachel Donadio:
I suppose you needed to write a news item and so you had to flesh it out by trotting out the usual things about Jews and Muslims, even referring yet again to the Regensburg Lecture - hardly news!

Williamson et al. have not been reconciled to the Catholic Church. They have merely had their episcopal excommunications revoked, so that further dialogue may now occur. The Pope hopes that this will bring the one major schismatic group back into communion with the Holy See.

And, the Holy Father is responsible for the souls of Catholics.

Now shut up and let me go on with my hibernation! Wake me up when this nonsense is over! [SM=g27826]



TERESA BENEDETTA
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 13:53



January 26
Saints Timothy and Titus, Bishops


No OR today.


THE POPE'S DAY

The Holy Father met today with
- H.E. Stanislas Lefebvre de Laboulaye, Ambassador of France to the Holy See, who presented his credentials.
Address in French.
- Bishops of Russia on ad-limina visit:
Mons. Paolo Pezzi, F.S.C.B., Archbishop of the 'Mother of God' Cathedral in Moscow;
Mons. Clemens Pickel, Bishop of St. Clement in Saratov;
Mons. Cyryl Klimowicz, Bishop of St. Joseph in Irkutsk and apostolic administrator for the Holy See; and
Mons. Joseph Werth, S.J., Bishop of the Transfiguration in Novosibirsk, and ordinary for
Byzantine-rite faithful who preside in Russia.
[NB: Because the Russian Orthodox Church objects to the idea of Roman Catholic dioceses in Russia, the Roman Catholic bishops
in Russia are given titles referring to their respective Cathedrals, rather than to their diocesan jurisdiction.]



The Vatican released today the program for the Holy Father's apostolic visit to Cameroon and Angola
on March 17-23.

The Vatican also released the message of the Holy Father to the Archbishop of Trragona (Spain) at
the conclusion of celebrations for the 1750th anniversary of the martyrdom of St. Fructuoso, Bishop,
and Saints Augurio and Eulogio, Deacons.



TERESA BENEDETTA
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 14:34



APOSTOLIC VOYAGE OF HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI
TO CAMEROON AND ANGOLA, March 17-23, 2009



P R O G R A M


I T A L Y

Wednesday, March 17
Fiumicino (Rome)

10.00 Departure from Leonardo Da Vinci International Airport.

C A M E R O O N

Yaoundé

16.00 Arrival at Nsimalen International Airport.
- WELCOME CEREMONY. Address by the Holy Father.


Wednesday, March 18

08.00 Private Mass, Chapel of the Apostolic Nunciature in Yaoundé.

10.00 COURTESY VISIT TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC,
Palace of Unity.

11.15 MEETING WITH THE BISHOPS OF CAMEROON, Church of Christ the King. Address by the Holy Father.

12.45 Lunch with the Bishops of Cameroon and the Papal Delegation, Apostolic Nunciature.

16.45 VESPERS CELEBRRATION with bishops, priests, religious, deacons, ecclesial movements and representatives
of other Christian confessions. Basilica of Mary Queen of the Apostles. Address by the Holy Father.


Thursday, March 19

08.45 MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY OF CAMEROON, Apostolic Nunciature.
Greeting by the Holy Father.

10.00 HOLY MASS on the occasion of the publication of the Instrumentum Laboris for
the Bishops Synod's II Special Assembly for Africa. Amadou Ahidjo Stadium. Homily.

16.30 MEETING WITH THE 'COMMUNITY OF THE SUFFERING', Cardinal Paul Emile Léger - CNRH Center.
Address by the Holy Father.

18.30 MEETING WITH MEMBERS OF THE BISHOPS SYNOD'S SPECIAL COUNCIL FOR AFRICA, Apostolic Nunciature.
Address of the Holy Father.

19.30 Dinner with Members of the Special Council and the cardinals and bishops in the papal delegation.
Apostolic Nunciature.


Friday, March 20

07.00 Private Mass, Chapel of the Nunciature.

08.45 Farewell at the Apostolic Nunciature.

10.00 DEPARTURE CEREMONY at Nsimalen International Airport.
Address by the Holy Father.

10.30 Departure for Luanda.


A N G O L A

Luanda

12.45 Arrival at 4 de Fevreiro International Airport in Luanda.
- WELCOME CEREMONY. Address by the Holy Father.

17.00 COURTESY VISIT TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC, Presidential Palace.

17.45 MEETING WITH POLITICAL AND CIVILIAN AUTHORITIES AND WITH THE DIPLOMATIC CORPS, Presidential Palace.
Address by the Holy Father.

19.00 MEETING WITH THE BISHOPS OF ANGOLA AND SÃO TOMÉ, Chapel of the Apostolic Nunciature.
Address by the Holy Father.

19.45 Dinner with the Bishops of Angola and São Tomé, and members of the Papal delegation. Apostolic Nunciature.


Saturday, March 21

10.00 HOLY MASS with the bishops, priests, religious, ecclesial movements and catechists of
Angola and São Tomé, Church of St. Paul. Homily.

16.30 MEETING WITH THE YOUTH, Stadio dos Coqueiros. Address of teh Holy Father.


Sunday, March 22

10.00 HOLY MASS with the bishops of IMBISA (Inter-Regional Meeting of Bishops of Southern Africa),
Cimangola Esplanade. Homily.
- ANGELUS at the Esplanade. Words by the Holy Father.

16.45 MEETING WITH CATHOLIC MOVEMENTS FOR PROMOTING WOMEN, Parish of St. Anthony.
Address by the Holy Father.


Monday, March 22

07.30 Private Mass, Chapel of the Nunciature.

09.15 Farewell at the Nunciature.

10.00 DEPARTURE CEREMONY at the international airport. Address by the Holy Father.

10.30 Departure for Ciampino (Rome).



I T A L Y

Rome

18.00 Arrival at Ciampino airport.

NB: Both Yaoundé and Luanda are in the same time zone as Rome.



TERESA BENEDETTA
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 15:12




Israel says Pope`s visit still on
despite anger over renegade bishop's
anti-Holocaust views




JERUSALEM, Jan. 25 (Reuters) - Pope Benedict is still due to visit to Israel in May, an Israeli official said on Sunday, despite angering Jews worldwide by re-admitting a bishop who has denied the full extent of the Nazi genocide of six million Jews.

Israel's national Holocaust museum and memorial decried as "scandalous" Benedict's decision to lift excommunications on British-born bishop, Richard Williamson, who has said there were no gas chambers and only 300,000 Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps in World War Two.

An Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman said, however, the Pontiff's planned visit in May to Israel was not in doubt.

"We believe that the question of excommunicating or not excommunicating a member of the Roman Catholic church is an internal matter for the Church," said Robert Rozet of the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial in Jerusalem.

"Nevertheless, we find it scandalous that a member of the church at this high level of bishop has views of denying the Holocaust," Rozet said. [Williamson has been outside the Church for 20 years, and as an illicitly ordained bishop of a schismatic group, one should not over-estimate his 'importance'. His views about the Holocaust are entirely his and have nothing to do with what the Church teaches, nor with objective fact, for that matter.]

Israeli Foreign Minister spokesman Yigal Palmor, asked if the Pope's decision would have an impact on his planned visit, replied: "No. This has nothing to do with relations between states.".

Williamson is one of four traditionalist bishops who were thrown out of the Roman Catholic Church in 1988 for being ordained without Vatican permission.



Belgian bishops statement
on Pope's conciliatory gesture
to the Lefebvrians

Translated from

January 26, 2009

Everything that contributes to Christian unity is a good thing".

"But as Benedict XVI often reminds us, unity is never achieved at the cost of truth. With his gesture of reconciliation, he has not placed into question the Second Vatican Council and its teachings."

This was the comment of Fr. Eric de Beukelaer, spokesman of the Belgian bishops' conference, on the revocation announced this weekend of the excommunication decree for the 4 Lefebvrian bishops.

He also said that "this question should not be mixed up with the statements of a traditionalist bishop who denies the reality of the Shoah", adding that "One can only deplore this."

He continued: "The Shoah remains the symbol of the homicidal folly of an inhuman regime obsessed with the idea of annihilating the Jewish people. Any person who minimizes its importance is acting as an ideologue, not as a historian. Doing so, he hurts our own duty to remember. It is obviously unacceptable and hardly intelligent."

The note released today by the Belgian bishops' conference includes a comment by a professor of canon law, Alphonse Borras, who defined the recall of the excommunication as "an undeniable act of will by Benedict XVI to seek a way of unity with all Christians separated from Rome".


Abbé Alphonse Borras it the Vicar-General of Liege (Belgium) and professor of canon law at the Catholic University of Liege. Lella has posted Abbe Borras's comment (written in French) on her blog. Here is a translation:

It is very gratifying that this took place during the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity - it is a living metaphor, a strong gesture, an undeniable act of will by Benedict XVI to seek a way of unity with all Christians separated from Rome.

"We can only rejoice, all of us. It is for each of us, from our own vantage points, to draw the lessons it gives! One cannot deny that the Pope truly wishes that certain interests 'end their contumacy', namely, their obstinate will to breach the law (cfr Canon 1358 § 1 of the Code of Canon Law), and offers to the ENTIRE Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X the possibility of returning to full communion with the Roman Church.





Cardinal Ricard:
'This is only the start
towards true dialog'

Translated from

January 26, 2009

"Revoking excommunication is never an end in itself but the start of a process of dialog," according to Cardinal Jean-Pierre Ricard, Archbishop of Bordeaux (France) and member of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, in a statement released yesterday by the French bishops' conference regarding the case of the 4 Lefebvrian bishops and their community.

"Pope Benedict XVI has gone as far as it is possible [for a Pope] to hold out a hand inviting reconciliation. The Pope, who is both a theologian and historian of theology, knows very well the tragedy represented by a schism in the Church. He himself [as Pope] is invested with the mission to put back together the frayed threads of ecclesial unity," he said.

Cardinal Ricard also calls attention to the fact that "This Pope knows the entire dossier very well" on the Lefebvrians, since as Cardinal Ratzinger, he was asked by Pope John Paul II (in 1988) to attempt to heal the rupture with the Lefebvrians, only to "meet with failure ultimately". [NB: He reached an agreement with Mons. Lefebvre which the late bishop signed but promptly reneged on, by going ahead to ordain 4 bishops without the Pope's approval. This was the basis for the automatic excommunication of the four ordained bishops along with Lefebvre and another bishop (also now deceased) who performed the consecration.]

The recall of the excommunication, said Ricard, "opens a path to take together. It will certainly be long. And will require better reciprocal consideration".

He points out that there are 'two fundamental questions' to be settled: "the juridical structure of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius in the Church, and an agreement on dogmatic and ecclesiological issues."

Above all, he said, "there is the question of the texts of the Second Vatican Council as documents of primary importance in the Magisterium - this is the fundamental issue." [By Church law, Council teachings take magisterial precedence even over Papal statements - an elementary fact most critics overlook when accusing Benedict XVI or John Paul II of 'negating' or 'reversing' Vatican-II, which by definition, they cannot.]

The difficulties, he adds, "will not necessarily be only doctrinal. Others - cultural and political - may emerge. An example are the recent unacceptable statements by Mons. Williamson denying the tragedy of the extermination of the Jews."

He concluded: "Let us not forget that the surest way to achieve unity among all the disciples of Christ is prayer."


I share the sentiments expressed by Giuliano Ferrara in a front-page editorial today for his newspaper.

It is urgent that the Vatican
repudiate Bishop Williamson's statements

by GIULIANO FERRARA
Translated from

Jan. 26, 2009


It is neither prudent nor wise for the Vatican that the recall of the Lefebvrian bishops' excommunication has opened the way to new controversy with the Jews.

The recall of a canonical act decreed in 1988 by John Paul II is obviously an internal matter for the Church, which is not the business of outsiders.

And Fr. Lombardi, the Jesuit in charge of the Vatican press office, punctiliously stated that the action has no other significance beyond what it is as a canonical act.

But the non-canonical effects of a canonical action must be weighed attentively.

The schismatic bishop Richard Williamson, one of the 4 welcomed back into communion with the Roman Church, said recently: "I believe there were never any gas chambers" [used by the Nazis to massacre Jews].

This is a 'belief' of the type that modern historical debate calls 'negationism' - the ideological decision, unsupported by historical facts and indeed contradicted by crushing documentary adn testimonial evidence, to erase the genocide of the European Jewry from the collective memory.

It is an act of violence to the millions of descendants of those who were victims of the German lager, and a brutal non-acknowledgment of a part of Jewish and Israeli identity that is dedicated to protecting that memory for always and everywhere.

Some explanation is needed to outsiders and the Jews because otherwise, it looks like the Church is throwing its arms around a bishop who holds these fideistic ideas about the history of the 20th century, and it is inevitable that equivocations, misunderstandings, even pain and sorrow, can only result in the context of the 'prophetic dialog' with the Jews that Rome has undertaken starting with Vatican-II.

And that is a determinative consideration in this whole episode.

It had been important for the Pope to redefine what is acceptable and practicable by the entire Church in terms of ritual worship. In this, he acted against what had been a certain conformism to the liberal interpretation of post-Conciliar liturgical reform, which did not make room for the traditional liturgy so beloved and respected by a part of the Catholic world.

But then the liberalization - which called attention to a prayer for the Jews used in the traditional Good Friday liturgy in an eschatologic sense - forced the Catholic hierarchy to make a series of explanations expressing respect for the Jews to point out that a reformulation of the prayer by Benedict XVI was in no way inconsistent with the path of dialog that had been begun and carried on by the last three Popes.

The same effort is needed now. It is necessary that someone at the highest levels in the Vatican takes the initiative to spell out that the negationist beliefs of Williamson is an irrational act that reflects a mindset holding to an anti-Jewish tradition which the Petrine Church has rejected fully and completely.

Among the many acts of charity and truth that the Church can do, allow me to say humbly and sincerely, this is among the most urgent right now.


maryjos
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 16:41
African apostolic visit schedule
Teresa: Thank you for being so early with your posting of the Holy Father's timetable for his African visit. It's good to be able to log all the details at this early date.
benefan
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 18:22
Moving on from one battle to another....


The Vatican Slams Obama Over Abortion

By Jeff Israely
TIME Magazine
Monday, Jan. 26, 2009

President Obama is probably not itching for a fight over abortion. But he might get one. With unusual speed, the Vatican has condemned Obama's Jan. 23 repeal of the ban on U.S. funding for foreign family planning aid groups who offer abortion services.

The repeal fulfils a campaign promise Obama made to pro-choice supporters. But if the late Friday afternoon signing was an attempt to get the change in under the radar, it didn't work. Top Vatican officials, usually hesitant to respond directly to Washington's domestic policy decisions, pounced quickly. By Saturday afternoon, the Holy See was emailing reporters the Sunday edition of its official daily, L'Osservatore Romano, which features a front page headline describing Obama's decision as "very disappointing." (Read "Shhh. Obama Repeals the Abortion Gag Rule, Very Quietly.")

The same day, the secular Milan daily Corriere della Sera published an interview with a top Vatican official lashing out at the new U.S. President. Archbishop Rino Fisichella, head of the Pontifical Academy for Life, told the newspaper that the repeal of the abortion-funding ban was done with "the arrogance of those who, having power, think they can decide between life and death." Troubled by the swiftness of Obama's pro-choice move, Fisichella brushed off earlier vows by the new president to try to cut the number of abortions, while ensuring a woman's access to the procedure. "On ethical questions, you can't play with words," said the Italian Archbishop, considered close to Pope Benedict XVI. "Hiding behind sophisms isn't worthy of he who has a responsibility towards citizens. People want clarity."

It's too early to predict a deep rupture in U.S.-Vatican relations. There was no mention of the issue in Sunday's regular Angelus ceremony, and the Pope personally sent warm messages of congratulations to Obama after both his election victory and inauguration. But don't count on Benedict staying silent as Obama ushers in more liberal laws for abortion or stem cell research.

If he does speak out, the Pope is likely to use his representatives in America. The front page Sunday story in L'Osservatore Romano focused on the U.S. bishops' response to the abortion rights decree. A recent video advertisement being aired by Catholicvote.com puts Obama in the middle of the abortion debate, implying that the future President, an African-American raised by a single mother, was himself at risk of being aborted.

Benedict knows that abortion is legal and widely available throughout the West, including virtually every country in Europe. It is the most glaring sign for the Pope of what he describes as the moral failings of contemporary life. But in the U.S., Benedict sees fertile possibility to challenge the status quo. On his trip to Washington D.C. and New York last April, Benedict heard how Catholics in America are being reinvigorated by a steady flow of more traditional immigrant Catholic groups. That matters. Fisichella concluded his interview by saying, "What happens in the U.S. influences other parts of the world. For this [its leaders] must be capable of listening, having humility and maybe even asking others for help."

Obama won a majority of Catholic voters, in part because he was able to convince them that he was both the right man to lead the country, and was generally in tune with their values. In his public speeches and private diplomacy, Benedict will use his notable intellect to reaffirm for American Catholics what those values are. It would be a chance to influence abortion legislation both in the U.S. and around the world. On abortion in other words, Benedict might be itching for a fight with Obama. If so, the new President will have to work hard to keep from getting bruised.



*********************************************************************


I don't see why anyone is surprised that Obama did what he did and that the Vatican reacted as it should and did!

Only the inexplicably naive could have interpreted the Holy Father's congratulatory messages [What would he have done - express ill will or preach his line?] as heralding harmony, because there could never be harmony with the new President on issues like abortion and embryonic stem-cell research, which are core principles for him and his party!

On the other hand, to say that 'Benedict XVI might be itching for a fight' with anyone is to completely trivialize the function of the Successor of Peter and to misrepresent Benedict XVI.

Popes - and good Christians in general - never 'itch for a fight' with anyone. They simply stand up consistently, at any time, and any occasion, against anyone, who acts or promotes policies in violation of the teachings of the Church as they impact on the daily lives of the faithful.

Thankfully, more Catholic bishops are becoming pro-active in standing up for the rights of the unborn and against the crime of abortion and any policies that encourage it. They have a duty to stick to it, despite the many Catholics who voted for Obama because they share his views on these core issues.


maryjos
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 22:58
How crazy!
Abortion has been legal in Britain since 1967. Has any pope ever been itching for a fight with any of our prime ministers? The government of Great Britain has always known that Christianity and especially Catholic Christianity is totally against abortion and contraception. I don't know if any of our prime ministers ever read Paul VI's "Humanae Vitae", but they should have done, simply for information if nothing else.

Obama is a secular president, even if he did take the oath on the Bible [wherein he may know he can read the Ten Commandments, which include "Thou shalt not kill", and that covers both abortion and contraception].

The Holy Father is a spiritual leader. Unfortunately, we have to live in secular states. We are in the world, but not of the world. In morals our first allegiance is to our Faith and our Holy Father.


With all these things going on, I'm not likely to get in any of that hibernation I was talking about. [SM=g27828] [SM=g27825] [SM=g27828] [SM=g27825]
TERESA BENEDETTA
00lunedì 26 gennaio 2009 23:12



Jewish-Catholic crisis seen
in bishop’s rehabilitation


January 25, 2009


Other than the egregiously wrong use of the word 'rehabillitation' in this respect, the following story from the Jewish news agency is fairly objective.

Williamson has not been 'rehabilitated' in the sense this headlline and story mean. His excommunication, along with three others, was revoked as a preliminary step to possibly reintegrating the schismatic community to which they belong within the Roman Catholic Church.

This is not about one man - it's about a worldwide community that may have as many as 2 million members.

The revocation is far from being a seal of approval by the Vatican on the persons involved and what they stand for. It merely represents exercise of the Pope's prerogatives regarding excommunication - what a Pope can impose, he can also lift - in this case, without great cost to the Church.



ROME, Jan. 25 (JTA) -- Pope Benedict XVI's rehabilitation of a traditionalist bishop who denies the full extent of the Holocaust could lead to a crisis in Jewish-Catholic relations, Jewish leaders said.

“By welcoming an open Holocaust denier into the Catholic Church without any recantation on his part, the Vatican has made a mockery of John Paul II's moving and impressive repudiation and condemnation of anti-Semitism," Rabbi David Rosen, the chairman of the International Jewish Committee for Interreligious Consultations, said in a statement. [Once again, I must remark how offensive and unjust I find Rabbi Rosen's statement, so devoid of the good sense and rational balance he showed over the question of the Good Friday prayer!]

The Pope on Saturday rescinded the 1988 excommunication of British-born Richard Williamson and three other traditionalist bishops who were followers of Marcel Lefebvre, the late French archbishop who rejected Vatican reforms including those recognizing the validity of Judaism as a living religion. [It's not as if Lefebvre cherry-picked any Vat-II reforms he did not like - he did an about-face and rejected all of Vatican-II, even if he had signed its enabling documents.]

Williamson has made several statements over the years questioning the reality of the Shoah. Last week he told Swedish television, "I believe there were no gas chambers," adding that only up to 300,000 Jews were killed in Nazi camps.

The Pope's action came just days before the annual international Holocaust Memorial Day on Jan. 27, the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.

Jewish leaders in Italy and elsewhere had warned that rehabilitating Williamson could prove a serious setback to Jewish-Catholic relations, already strained by controversy over the wartime role of Pope Pius XII and last year's reintroduction of an Easter prayer that some see as calling for conversion of the Jews.

Rome's Chief Rabbi Riccardo Di Segni said that rehabilitating Williamson would open a "deep wound."

Yad Vashem, the Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ Remembrance Authority, said in a statement released Sunday:

"The reinstatement is an internal Church matter. However, it is scandalous that someone of this stature in the Church denies the Holocaust. Denial of the Holocaust not only insults the survivors, memory of the victims, and the Righteous Among the Nations who risked their lives to rescue Jews, it is a brutal attack on truth.

"Even if the revocation of the excommunication is unrelated to Williamson’s comments regarding the Holocaust, what kind of message is this sending regarding the Church’s attitude toward the Holocaust?

"Although we understand that Williamson’s statements do not represent the Church’s stance, we continue to hope that the Church will vigorously condemn these unacceptable and odious comments."
[That's a reasonable position - and it's unfortunate that the Vatican has had to be reminded about this.]

**********************************************************************

Fellay and company are in the situation of the Chinese bishops ordained without the approval of the Vatican, but whose ordinations, over time, have been 'recognized' by the Vatican. Except that the Chinese bishops were not automatically excommunicated as were Fellay and company because John Paul II decided - rightfully - that they should not be penalized given the circumstances of the Church in China.

(But bishops who knowingly and deliberately ordain women priests should not think they are entitled to the same dispensation, since they are not living under duress, and the canon law violation in their case is not only lack of papal approval, but also the more fundamental fact that the Church simply does not allow women priests.)

Pope Benedict made the tactical decision to lift the excommunication on the Lefbvrian bishops, in order to remove a stumbling block to real negotiations on doctrinal matters that may eventually allow the FSSPX to rejoin the Church in full communion.

His move clears the way for such a dialog, because it grants one of the key conditions made by the FSSPX, but it also puts the burden now on the Lefebvrians to prove their good faith.

The Pope has done all he can do - and all he is allowed to do - to move the process forward. It is clear there will be and can be no concessions on Vatican-II. The Lefebvrians must learn to live with it if they are sincere about wanting to come back to the Church.

An interview with Mons. Fellay published today by a Swiss newspaper is a mixed bag, but it shows some glimmer of hope. Rorate caeli has provided a translation, but as it is fairly short, I have translated it myself in the post below.





TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 gennaio 2009 00:42



Mons. Fellay says he is confident
about the future:
"I believe in the infallibility of the Church'

by Patricia Briel
Translated from

January 25, 2009
Le Temps is a French-language newspaper published in Switzerland.





Ms. Briel cut to the chase on 'the issue' of the moment, good for her!


Do you condemn the negationist views of Mons. Williamson?
It is not for me to condemn them. I do not have the competence to do that. But I deplore that a bishop could have given the impression of involving the entire Fraternity in an affair which has absolutely nothing to do with us.

[That doesn't say much for Fellay. Historical events are either true or false. Williamson states falsities. In the case of massively documented historical fact, no one needs a special 'competence' to judge what is true and false, right and wrong!

And Fellay is wrong to say the Holocaust 'has absolutely nothing to do with us'. It has to do with every human being who respects life and the right of every human being to exist regardless of race or religion.

If the FSSPX head cannot even bring himself to say something as basic as that, he is missing the very essence of being Christian! He may have his reasons for wanting to be noncommittal about issues that do not have to directly with the FSSPX, but in this case, the issue does directly concern his congregation since the statements are made by one of his bishops. To be noncommittal in the circumstances is sheer moral cowardice.]



According to observers, the Pope's decision could create divisions within the Fraternity itself - that not all the priests and the faithful are ready for unity.
I am not afraid of anything. There can always be a discordant voice here and there. But the zeal which the faithful put into praying the rosary to implore for the lifting of the excommunications says a lot about our unity. One million 700,000 rosaries were offered in a period of one and a half months.


In your letter to the faithful on January 24, you said that you wish to examine with Rome the profound causes for "the unprecedented crisis which is shaking the Church today". What are these causes?
Essentially, the crisis is caused a by a new approach to the world, a new view of man - an anthropocentrism which consists in exalting man and forgetting God. [In short, secularization.] The advent of modern philosophies, with their less precise language, has led to confusion within theology.


Do you think the Second Vatican Council is also responsible for the crisis in the Church?
The Church is not responsible for everything [about the crisis]. But it is true that we [the FSSPX] reject part of the Council. Benedict XVI himself has condemned those who claim to represent the 'spirit of Vatican II' to demand an evolution of the Church through rupture with the past. [Except that I don't believe Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI ever used the verb 'condemn' about the progressives who advocate the hermeneutic of rupture.]


In the center of your criticisms of Vatican II are ecumenism and religious freeedom.
The search for unity among everyone in the Mystical Body of the Church is our dearest wish. But the methods used are not adequate. Today, one insists too much on the points which unite us to other Christian confessions that one forgets those that separate us. [Mons. Fellay has not been reading Cardinal Kasper's recent reports on the state of the ecumenical dialog, which has focused on trying to reconcile theological differences!]

We think that those who left the Catholic Church, namely, the Orthodox and the Protestants, should return to it. We think of ecumenism as a return to the unity of Truth. [So does the Church - but it is realistic enough to know that non-Catholic Christians are also human beings first, and that it is not that easy to get others to give up habits and traditions lasting a millennium in the case of the Orthodox and several centuries in the case of the Reformed Churches.]

In the case of religious freedom, one must distinguish two situations: freedom of religion for the individual, and relations between Church and State.

Religious freedom implies freedom of conscience. We agree that one cannot force anyone to accept a certain religion. And as for our views on Church-State relations, they are based on the principle of tolerance.

It seems evident to us that where there are multiple religions, the State should see to their good relations and peace among each other.

On the other hand, there is only one true religion, and the others are not. [And the members of other religions think exactly the same way about their own religion!] But we tolerate this situation for the good of all. [But that's the way it is - diversity in the world on everything - and that is why the Church keeps emphasizing its mission to evangelize!]


What will happen if your negotiations [with Rome] fail?
I am confident. If the Church says something today that contradicts what it taught yesterday and obliges us to accept this change, then it should explain its reasons. [But is the Church teaching anything different today than it did yesterday? That would be an outright misreading of Vatican-II, which in fact, corrected certain unwritten and undesirable attitudes that had become entrenched among the faithful. For instance, any historical anti-Jewish sentiment arose out of common practice that became taken for granted, not from any explicit doctrine by the Church that Jews are to be mistrusted, much less discriminated against.]

I believe in the infallibility of the Church, and I think we will arrive at a true solution.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 gennaio 2009 02:24




Cardinal Bagnasco deplores unjust
accusations against Benedict XVI


Translated from




ROME, Jan. 26 (Apcom) - The Italian bishops consider the statements made by the Italian Jews against the Pope 'unjust'.

In his long opening address today to open the winter meeting of the Permanent Council of the Italian bishops' conference (CEI), CEI president Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, Archbishop of Genoa, also expressed the wish that the difficulties between Catholics and Jews will be overcome, but he firmly condemned the statements by some Italian rabbis against Benedict XVI.

"While, on the one hand, we hope that these difficulties will soon be overcome and allow us to resume dialog," Bagnasco said, "we certainly do not appreciate the unjust words pronounced against the actions of Benedict XVI."

"We have been witness to the sincere theological circumstances that irrevocably impels the Holy Father towards our Jewish brothers. We share that attitude with him."

The CEI president did not cite make any specific references, but kept to general statements, since it was just part of his bi-annual state-of-the-Italian-Church report.

"Unfortunately," he continued, "some singular reservations were expressed recently by some representatives of the Italian rabbinical assembly regarding their decision not to participate this year in the annual Day for the development of dialog among Catholics and Jews, which has been observed for some time now by many countries in Europe, including Italy.

""While, on the one hand, we hope that these difficulties will soon be overcome and allow us to resume dialog, we certainly do not appreciate the unjust words pronounced against the actions of Benedict XVI."



As usual, Cardinal Bagnasco is just about the only ranking bishop to state his public support for Pope Benedict XVI, as Cardinal Ruini did before him - even if both also spoke in behalf of all Italian bishops, in their role as president of the Italian bishops conference. (Remember that it was only Cardinals Ruini and Bagnasco who spoke out about the La Sapienza disgrace last year and Ruini organized a popular rally overnight to show support for the Pope.)

Why is it that the Curia hardly ever rallies behind this Pope? What would it cost them to make a statement to the media in his behalf? Did they have a similar 'can't-be-bothered', hands off attitude in the time of John Paul II? Or did John Paul II not have any 'controversies' that required coming to his defense?

Actually, I think it was because the MSM attributed all the things they disliked about Church policies, enunciated or given play under John Paul II, to Cardinal Ratzinger, their 'bad cop', mostly leaving John Paul II, in the role of good cop that they assigned to him, sacrosanct to their slings and arrows - the better to concentrate them on Cardinal Ratzinger, who certainly needed Panzer (armor) to withstand that onslaught!

For instance, Dominus Iesus was hugely unpopular because widely misunderstood, so it was all Cardinal Ratzinger's fault, even if John Paul signed it. Fides et ratio was a beautiful encyclical that everyone found admirable, but no one credited Cardinal Ratzinger's part in it except for a few Vaticanistas who knew better.

And now, Papa Ratzinger does not have a Cardinal Ratzinger of his own to be his lightning rod, and everything unpleasant gets dumped on him. It won't be long before the media start calling him the PanzerPope - and I think I may not be wrong if I surmise that the term Panzerkardinal for such a gentle soul and fragile body was really intended to associate him with Nazi images, short of calling him the Nazi cardinal [though I've seen references to him as 'Nazinger'.




TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 gennaio 2009 04:36



The outcry over the excommunication recall and unacceptable statements by one of the bishop beneficiaries prompted this front-page editorial in tomorrow's double issue of L'Osservatore Romano.


The wrong script:
When a conciliatory gesture
becomes a scandal in the media

Editorial
by Carlo Di Cicco
Translated from
the 1/26-1/27 issue of




Somehow the wrong script is being staged, and so the lifting of the excommunication of four bishops illicitly ordained in 1988 has become a new media 'scandal' full of emotional tones.

With frantic opportunism, the media has laid on Benedict XVI the 'sin' not only of taking anti-conciliar positions, but even, of imprudence - if not connivance - in sustaining negationist ideas about the Holocaust.

The words of the Pope at the Vespers that closed the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity and his reflections during the Angelus prayers Sunday give the lie to this widespread fear-mongering about him.

Benedict XVI said important words to guarantee that 'the older ones among us will certainly never forget" that first announcement about Vatican II made by John XXIII "on January 25, 1959, exactly 50 years ago today".

An act that Benedict XVI today calls 'a providential decision' inspired by the Holy Spirit, and which this newspaper recalled, not accidentally, with emphasis, on the very day the excommunications were revoked.

It is in the light of the Pope's conviction about the Council as an event inspired from on high that one must read his recall of the excommunications.

The reforms intended by the Council have not yet been fully realized, but they have become so consolidated in the Catholic Church that they cannot be placed into crisis by a magnanimous gesture of mercy. And one that is inspired by a Church renewed as intended by Vatican-II which certainly chose mercy over condemnation.

The recall which has provoked such an outcry does not by itself end a painful episode like the Lefebvrian schism. But with it, the Pope has cleared the field of possible pretexts for endless polemics, in order to get into the merits of the true issue: full acceptance by the Lefebvrians of the Magisterium - which includes, obviously, Vatican-II.

Just as it is true that the Catholic Church was not born with Vatican-II, it is equally true that the Church which was renewed by the Council is not another Church - it remains the same Church of Christ, founded on the apostles, guaranteed by the Successor of Peter, and therefore, a living Tradition.

Papa Giovanni's announcement in 1959 did not make tradition disappear - it continues today in new forms of pastoral ministry and a Magisterium that was updated by the Council.

That is why it seems like a rhetorical exercise, if not directly offensive, to propose that Benedict XVI could 'sell out' the Council for whomever and for whatever reason.

Equally rhetorical is the recurrent questioning by some people as to whether this Pope is really sold on ecumenism and dialog with the Jews!

The strategic commitments of his Pontificate have been open to the eyes of everyone, and all his single pastoral and magisterial acts clearly proceed from an application of the strategy he stated soon after he was elected. He has followed his program in collegial sharing of the most important tasks with his brother bishops.

Dialog is a constitutive part of the post-Conciliar Church, and Benedict XVI has reiterated often, as late as Sunday, that ecumenism requires the genuine conversion of everyone - including the Church itself - to Christ.

In a converted Church, "diversity will no longer be an obstacle that separates us, but richness, in the multiplicity of expressions of our common faith".

The revocation of the excommunications is far from full communion. The course of reconciliation with the traditionalists was a collegial choice long made known to the Church of Rome, not a sudden improvised move by Benedict XVI.

Acceptance of the Council necessarily means a clear position on negationism. The Vatican-II declaration Nostra aetate, which marks the most authoritative Catholic statement about Judaism, deplores "the hatreds, teh persecutions and all manifestations of anti-Semitism directed against the Jews in every age and by whomever". This is a teaching that is not debatable by any Catholic.

The post-Conciliar Popes, including Benedict XVI, have been very explicit about this teaching - in dozens of documents, discourses and acts.

The recent negationist statements [by Lefebvrian bishop Richard Williamson] contradict this teaching, and are therefore most serious and regrettable. Made several months before the excommunications were revoked, the statements are - and will always be - unacceptable.


**********************************************************************


The editorial is the sort of balancing act that may only be possible in a Catholic newspaper, and the 'Pope's newspaper' sets a fine example of responding to overheated polemics in a cool, calm and reasoned way. Without recrimination whatsoever against the most outspoken Jewish critics of the Pope.

It names no names, it does not belabor or need to repeat facts already familiar to anyone who follows the news, and presents the
position of the Church and the Pope simply and clearly.

It may not exactly be what Giuliano Ferrara had in mind in his editorial translated a few posts above - and it comes from the pen of the newspaper's deputy editor, not a high Vatican official as, say, Cardinal Bertone - but in the context of what the OR is, it is a good and appropriate statement.

What's more, tomorrow's double issue contains five stories no less about the Holocaust, as a fitting way to mark Holocaust Memorial Day on January 27. How's that for staying on message, unfazed by the surrounding circus? They did not just pluck those articles out of thin air - they must have commissioned them with enough time beforehand.









TERESA BENEDETTA
00martedì 27 gennaio 2009 13:59



January 27

St. Angela Merici (1474-1540)
Virgin and Founder of the Ursulines


OR for 1/26-1/27:

50 years since John XXIII announced Vatican-II,
Benedict XVI recalls its fundamental contribution to ecumenism:
'Christian unity needs courageous gestures of reconciliation'


Other Page 1 stories: An editorial on the outcry arising from the Pope's revocation of the excommunication of four
Lefebvrian bishops (See translation in preceding post); the Pope's Angelus message on ecumenism and conversion;
his message to the new ambassador from France that scientific progress must serve mankind (above right, photo);
and the proposal of Hamas for a year's ceasefire. Notably, on Holocast Memorial Day today, there are five stories
in the inside pages about the Shoah, led by an essay by Anna Foa entitled "Anti-Semitism is the only motive
for negationism', referring to the ideological denial that the Holocaust ever happened.



No papal events scheduled today.

benefan
00martedì 27 gennaio 2009 16:51

I find this article to be one of the most reasonable, refreshing responses I've seen to the pope's decision about the 4 bishops, in particular, the crazy one.


Pope Benedict: Panderer or Creative Community Builder?

By Rabbi Brad Hirschfield
washingtonpost.com
For God's Sake blog
January 26, 2009

Pope Benedict XVI has reinstated four previously excommunicated bishops, all of whom are members of a far-right group that rejects Vatican II and one of whom is a raging conspiracy theorist and Holocaust denier. Is Benedict pandering to those on the theological far-right of the Church, and if so, why? Or could he be moving to create a genuinely more inclusive church, one which actually makes room for those whose views are loathsome to most church members? Perhaps it's a bit of both.

If that is case, this Pope continues his tradition of making theological/communal moves which are so nuanced that they end up being misunderstood by most and may actually hurt many, even if that is not his intention. Think of his speech about Islam, his reinstating the Good Friday prayer which calls for the conversion of Jews, etc.

Whatever is going on here, the focus should not be on the fact that one of those reinstated, Richard Williamson, is a Holocaust denier and how painful that is to Jews. The truth is it should disturb all people who actually care about facts and accuracy. Williamson's reinstatement doesn't bother me because I am Jewish, it bothers me because I would hope that it is beneath the Church to honor a man who believes and continues to teach such ugly and dangerous lies.

On the other hand, is it appropriate to judge this man based entirely upon his attitude toward the Holocaust? Is it fair to him? How would any of us hold up if the world measured any of us by the most outrageous belief we might hold?

In no way am I excusing Williamson. But I am willing to entertain that however much pain his reinstatement might cause relative to this issue, it may not be the only basis upon which the Pope should make his decision, nor should it govern the future of Church-Jewish relations, as some have already suggested/threatened it will.

The idea that this one move will jeopardize Catholic Jewish relations is either insane or tragic. And any leaders, especially those who call themselves inter-faith leaders who intimate that Williamson's reinstatement will, should be ashamed of themselves. Real relationships between communities are stronger than what any one leader identified with either, might say. If they are not, then the relationships were never that strong to begin with and we should focus on that.

More interesting here, is the Pope's willingness to find a place for these men in particular and for the Society of Saint Pius X in general. If our definition of inclusiveness does not reach beyond the boundaries of our own personal comfort, can we call ourselves truly inclusive?

How ironic then, that this conservative Pope who is deeply committed to maintaining the authority of the church, is willing to include those who challenge its authority on a number of theological and liturgical issues. Of course the test will be if in the weeks and months ahead, Benedict is willing to reach as far to his left as he has now reached to his right.

If he does make a parallel move to the left, this Pope will have accomplished far more good than bad, not only for the Church he leads, but toward modeling how real inter-group and inter-religious relationships are nurtured. He will have demonstrated the danger of single issue litmus testing in relations between any people. And that would be a profound spiritual lesson for all of us, one for which I would be deeply grateful.


Rabbi Brad Hirschfield is an author, radio and TV talk show host, and President of CLAL-The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership. His On Faith blog, For God's Sake, explores the uses and abuses of religion in politics and pop culture.




TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 01:04



About time Mons. Fellay did this!

Mons. Fellay begs Pope's forgiveness
for Williamson remarks and
bans negationist from making
public statements on non-Church matters




ROME, Jan. 27 (Translated from SIR) - The Lefebvrians have apologized to Pope Benedict XVI for the negationist statements of Bishop Richard Williamson.

In a letter to the Pope, Mons. Bernard Fellay, superior-general of the Fraternite Sacerdotale St. Pie X (FSSPX), said Williams's views on teh Holocaust "do not in any way reflect the position of our Fraternity".

"We ask for the forgiveness of the Supreme Pontiff and of all men of good will for the unhappy consequences of Bishop Williamson;s statements," Mons. Fellay said, in the letter released by the Vatican Press Office.




We have learned about the interview given by Mons. Richard Williamson, a member of our Fraternity, to Swedish televisioon. In that interview, he expressed himself about some historical events, particularly the question of the genocide of teh Jews on the part of the National Socialists.

It is evident that a Catholic bishop cannot speak with ecclesiastical authority except on questions regarding faith and morals. Our Fraternity does not claim competence on any other questions.

The mission of the Fraternity is the propagation and restoration of authentic Catholic doctrine as expressed in the dogmas of the faith. It is with great pain that we note how much harm the transgression of that mandate can do to our mission.

The statements of Mons. Williamson do not in an way reflect the position of our Fraternity. Therefore I have prohibited him, until further orders, from taking any public position on political or historical matters.

I ask the forgiveness of the Supreme Pontiff and all men of good will for the tragic consequences of such action.

Sadly, we note that these inopportune statements strike directly at our Fraternity by discrediting our mission.

We cannot accept this, and we will continue to preach Catholic doctrine and to administer the sacraments of grace of our Lord Jesus Christ.



Menzingen, 27 janvier 2009
+ Bernard Fellay
Supérieur Général




rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/
which has always followed the traditionalist groups closely, has this added statement from the German district of the FSSPK:

Note of the District Superior for Germany of the FSSPX

As District Superior of the Society [of Saint Pius X] in Germany, I am very troubled by the words pronounced by Bishop Williamson here in this country.

The banalization of the genocide of the Jews by the Nazi regime and of its horror are unacceptable for us.

The persecution and murder of an incalculable number of Jews under the Third Reich touches us painfully and they also violate the Christian commandment of love for neighbor which does not distinguish ethnicities.

I must apologize for this behavior and dissociate myself from such a view.

Such dissociation is also necessary for us because the father of Archbishop Lefebvre died in a KZ [concentration camp] and because numerous Catholic priests lost their lives in Hitler's concentration camps.


Stuttgart, January 27, 2009
Father Franz Schmidberger



Vatican stresses Pope's
condemnation of Holocaust




VATICAN CITY, Jan. 27 (AP) — The Vatican intensified its defense of Pope Benedict XVI on Tuesday, highlighting his record of condemning the Holocaust amid an outcry over his rehabilitation of a bishop who claims that no Jews were gassed during World War II.

Vatican Radio aired a lengthy program to mark Holocaust remembrance day. It recalled Benedict's 2006 visit to Auschwitz, his 2005 visit to the main synagogue in Cologne, Germany and other remarks in which he has denounced the "insane, racist ideology" that produced the Holocaust.

See also translated item from the Italian service of Vatican Radio on "The Shoah in the Magisterium of Benedict XVI"
freeforumzone.leonardo.it/discussione.aspx?idd=354494&p=243

Video clips of those remarks were posted on Vatican links on the Holy See's new YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/vatican

"Let today's humanity never forget Auschwitz and the other 'factories of death' in which the Nazi regime tried to eliminate God and take his place!" Benedict said during his general audience May 31, 2006, just after returning to Rome from a visit to Auschwitz.

Vatican Radio also ran an interview with an Auschwitz survivor.

The Vatican has been focusing on Benedict's record deploring anti-Semitism after Jewish groups voiced outrage that he lifted the excommunication of a traditionalist bishop, Richard Williamson, who has denied that 6 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust.

The Vatican has stressed that removing the excommunication by no means implied the Vatican shared Williamson's views.

On Monday, the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, ran a front-page article saying Williamson's views were "unacceptable" and violated Church teaching. It reaffirmed that Benedict deplored all forms of anti-Semitism and that all Roman Catholics must do the same.

The American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants said the Vatican's attempts to reject Williamson's views were necessary but insufficient. [ *&^%$#@!@#$%^&*&^%$#@!@#$%^&*&^%$#@!@#$%^&*...i.e., expletives ad infinitum!]

The group's vice president, Elan Steinberg, called on the Vatican to further address what he called its "moral failure" in rehabilitating Williamson.

"At a minimum, the Vatican should now demand that Williamson repudiate his heinous views," Steinberg said.
Williamson and three other bishops were excommunicated 20 years ago after they were consecrated by the late ultraconservative Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre without papal consent — a move the Vatican said at the time was an act of schism.

Benedict has made clear from the start of his pontificate that he wanted to reconcile with Lefebvre's traditionalist Society of St. Pius X and bring it back into the Vatican's fold.

Lefebvre had rebelled against the Vatican and founded the society in 1969. He was bitterly opposed to the teachings of the Second Vatican Council, the 1962-65 meetings that brought liberal reforms to the church, including outreach to Jews.


benefan
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 02:05
[SM=g27816] Williamson Silenced [SM=g27816]

Wulfrune and Teresa have both posted the news that Bishop Williamson, has finally been silenced by Mons. Fellay. (See Teresa's post above and Wulfrune's in the Notables thread.

In a way, Mons. Fellay's action is like shutting the barn door after the horse has escaped. By not keeping a tight leash on Bishop Williamson, he has allowed a really positive step by the pope to become yet one more opportunity for all the pope's critics and lots of others to jump on poor Papa with both feet.

I admit that right after the removal of the excommunications, I was puzzled and dismayed by the pope's action, mainly because of Williamson's crazy comments. But the more that I have read the reactions and explanations of others, both pro and con, I have come to believe that the pope acted not only out of mercy towards the four men and the thousands they lead but out of extreme humility.

The FSSPX has been very arrogant in their demands of the pope to meet certain conditions before they even think about returning to the fold. The pope must know that the longer the schism lasts, the wider the gap becomes and the more impossible it will be to close it. He feels the urgency of acting now to do what he can to try to bring this group back before it is too late.

The first step demanded by the FSSPX was the removal of the excommunications of the bishops. I hate to make a comparison to John Paul II like so many journalists constantly do but I think JPII was a very self-confident and proud man. I don't think he would ever have reversed the excommunications. Benedict is astonishingly humble. We could see that from the day of his installation Mass when HE was the one bowing as world leaders came up afterwards to congratulate him. He knew that if the FSSPX was ever going to return to the church, HE would have to humble himself and take the first step, even though he knew he would face a storm of criticism from all sides for it. But being a very caring pastor concerned for the souls under the sway of the FSSPX and also being a very courageous man, he took that step. Despite the resultant uproar, I think he has earned the respect of those in the FSSPX and the real icing on the cake is that that Williamson guy will now be made to shut his big mouth and give some serious thought to his warped outlook on life. I wouldn't be surprised if more restrictions on him were to follow.

So, bravo, Papa, and I hope that the wolves stop howling below your window soon and slink back to their hiding places. At least, until next time.

**********************************************************************


Benefan, I am putting back the John Allen item you posted earlier... It's his take and his translation, after all...


Holocaust denier bishop gagged
By John Allen, Jr.
National Catholic Reporter
Jan. 27, 2009


The Vatican today released a statement from Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X and one of the four traditionalist bishops whose excommunication was rescinded in a Jan. 21 decree from the Congregation for Bishops.

The statement is in response to the uproar created by a recent interview on Swedish television in which another of the traditionalist bishops, Richard Williamson, asserted that the Nazis had not used gas chambers and that only 200,000 to 300,000 Jews had died in the Second World War.

The statement was released in Italian and French; the following is an NCR translation from the Italian.

Statement of His Excellency Bernard Fellay,
Superior of the Fraternity of St. Pius X


We have become aware of an interview released by Bishop Richard Williamson, a member of our Fraternity of St. Pius X, to Swedish television. In this interview, he expressed himself on historical questions, and in particular on the question of the genocide against the Jews carried out by the Nazis.

It’s clear that a Catholic bishop cannot speak with ecclesiastical authority except on questions that regard faith and morals. Our Fraternity does not claim any authority on other matters. Its mission is the propagation and restoration of authentic Catholic doctrine, expressed in the dogmas of the faith. It’s for this reason that we are known, accepted and respected in the entire world.

It’s with great sadness that we recognize the extent to which the violation of this mandate has done damage to our mission. The affirmations of Bishop Williamson do not reflect in any sense the position of our Fraternity. For this reason I have prohibited him, pending any new orders, from taking any public positions on political or historical questions.

We ask the forgiveness of the Supreme Pontiff, and of all people of good will, for the dramatic consequences of this act. Because we recognize how ill-advised these declarations were, we can only look with sadness at the way in which they have directly struck our Fraternity, discrediting its mission.

This is something we cannot accept, and we declare that we will continue to preach Catholic doctrine and to administer the sacraments of grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

Menzingen, January 27, 2009



Dear Benefan:

Your comments were very welcome and wise. Non-Catholics - and even many Catholics - often forget that the Pope really is the Vicar of Christ on earth and so he cannot be less than a good shspherd who must and does go out of his way to try and bring back stray lambs.

How can he preach about unity with other Christians if he does not look after unity within the Church first - its structural unity as the Body of Christ (because, of course, there will always be contentious black sheep within the fold).

But the good shepherd Benedict is also the devout and wise and humble realist Joseph Ratzinger - and he bent as far as he can go for the Lefebvrians, who set the lifting of the excommunications as a precondition for moving ahead with dialog. They considered that precondition so important they launched their widely publicized rosary campaign to pray for it to happen. [There's a lesson there for the rest of us!]

Their announcement video of the excom lifting is genuinely exultant - you can see it on their French district site -
www.laportelatine.org/accueil/accueil.php

Too bad the side issue of Williamson has muddled the picture fot the general public, who misunderstand the revocation of excommunication as if it meant a general absolution, a stamp of approval, or a guarantee of goodness for the persons concerned! The action was not for the bishops as individuals but as representatives of their community.

I am quite apprehensive, however, about how - and even if - the Lefebvrians will open their minds to Vatican-II. That's the great hurdle. I almost think it might be very welcome and useful if the Holy Father oculd record a special video message to the FSSPX membership to reinforce the point that Vatican-II opened the way to renewal in continuity, and that if it is seen as such, then ecumenism and inter-faith dialog can pose no risk or danger to traditional Catholic faith, no dilution in Catholic doctrine.!



TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 10:47



Mons Fellay says
'Thank you' to the Pope

Interview by
Alessandro Gnocchi and
and Mario Palmaro
Translated from

January 27, 2009



Mons. Fellay, on June 30, 1988, you along with three other priests of the FSSPX, were consecrated bishops by Mons. Marcel Lefebvre. This made the four of you, along with the Brazilian Bishop Antonio De Castro Mayer, who also took part in the rites, among the first to be excommunicated after Vatican II. Today, after 20 years, you are the Superior General of the Order, or as the media usually say, the head of the Lefebvrians.



We are in Menzingen, in the middle of Switzerland, in the Fraternity's mother house, and it's snowing outside, and here on the table is the decree from the Vatican that revoked the excommunication. How do you feel?

Joy. Satisfaction. But not as someone who feels he is a winner! What the Fraternity of St. Pius has done, from its establishment up to now, it will continue to do, and does only for the good of the Church.

And even the ordinations of 1988 were done with that end. For the good of the Church and for our survival. Mons. Lefebvre had the duty - I repeat that, he was duty-bound - to insure our continuity. We are nothing but a small lifeboat on a stormy sea. But we have always been in the service of the Church and will continue to do so.

The withdrawal of the excommunications, along with Pope Benedict's Motu Proprio on the traditional Mas, is an important signal, truly an important one, for our little lifeboat. That is why I say I am filled with joy and satisfaction.


Where and when did you learn of the decree?
Several days ago in Rome, at the office of Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, president of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei. We hugged each other.

Then, the first thing I did was to thank Our Lady - this was her gift. It was to obtain her intercession for this cause that some one million 700-thousand rosaries were offered since October by the faithful who all prayed for the recall of the excommunication.


Who, in the Vatican, worked most to reach this stage?
Of course, Cardinal Castrillon as head of Ecclesia Dei, which has been the liaison between the Holy See and our Fraternity. But above all, Pope Benedict XVI.

I saw that at the first meeting we had shortly after his election. Even while expressing his reproaches, the Holy Father always had a very kind attitude, truly paternal.


The decree says that the Holy Father trusts in your commitment "not to spare any effort to look deeper" during the necessary conversations that will follow with Vatican authorities "into the questions that remain open". What does that mean?
It means that, like all the children of the Church, we are entitled to discuss questions which we believe to be fundamental for the faith and for the life of the Church itself. I think that it acknowledges at the very least the seriousness of the critical positions we have taken during the past 40 years. We only want these questions to be cleared up.

The fact that the Holy Father appears to tend in that direction is a great comfort to us. It is important to understand that even when we make severe criticisms, we have never been against the Church, we have never been against the papacy.

What can we do? We are often called Lefebvrians as if in accusation, but we are not 'Lefebvrians', even if we consider that a badge of honor: we are Catholics. And the very first who was not Lefebvrian was Mons, Lefebvre himself.

When this is made clear, then people will understand our positions better. It will take time, but I believe that before long, it will be clear that everything we do is done for the Church.


Was the excommunication recall the result of negotiations and coming to an agreement, or was it a unilateral act of the Holy See?
Several times in the past, we had asked for freedom to celebrate the traditional Mass aod for the excommunications to be lifted. But what has just happened was not the result of negotiations or an agreement. It was a freely given unilateral action which shows that Rome truly wishes us well. For real and for good.

For a long time, we had been given the impression that Rome was not interested in discussing anything. But then everything changed, and we owe this to the Pope.


Why do you think Pope Benedict wanted to do this? Did he realize what a tangle this could land him in?
Oh yes, I believe he is well aware that there would be adverse reactions. But before and after he was elected Pope, he himself lways spoke of the crisis in the Church in the least ambiguous ways.

When I speak of his paternal kindness, I also mean that it is clear he knows the times in which we live, that he has the firmness to propose remedies, and attention to all his children.

Of course, this also means that critical reactions which are generally adverse to his actions may cause him suffering, but they will certainly not force him to change his thinking. That is the way he made this decision.


In this context, can one synthesize the news by saying that Tradition is no longer excommunicated?
Yes, even if it will take some time before this idea becomes currency within the Catholic World. Even today, in many circles, we are considered and treated as worse than the devil. And that everything that we say and do must be bad. So I don't think the situation will change all of a sudden.

But yes, now there is an act by the Holy See that enables us to say that at last, Tradition is no longer excommunicated.


What is it like to live excommunicated?
One regrets that such a mark of infamy is also exploited maliciously. But we have never felt excommunicated, we have never considered ourselves schismatic. We have always felt ourselves to be part of the Church, and the news we are discussing today proves that we were right.


Then one has to ask why it took so long to come to this point. Above all, what is the nature of the questions that the decree refers to which must still be discussed?
Let me try to say it in a few words. At a certain point, we saw that the Church had undertaken a new road, one which we believed would lead to great problems. At the same time, we have done nothing but to think, teach and practise what the Church has taught from the beginning - nothing more, nothing less. We have not invented anything. We have simply followed Tradition. And today, Tradition is no longer excommunicated.

TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 13:06



Chief Rabbinate of Israel
cuts ties with Vatican

By MATTHEW WAGNER

January 28, 2009


The Chief Rabbinate of Israel broke off official ties with the Vatican indefinitely on Tuesday in protest over the Pope's decision to reinstate a known Holocaust denier.

The Chief Rabbinate also cancelled a meeting scheduled for March 2-4 in Rome with the Holy See's Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.

In a letter to the commission's chairman, Cardinal Walter Casper, Chief Rabbinate Director-General Oded Weiner wrote that "without a public apology and recanting, it will be difficult to continue the dialogue."

According to a Chief Rabbinate source, the letter was leaked to the Israeli press before it was received by the Vatican, which might further complicate relations between the Chief Rabbinate and the Catholic Church.

Last week, in an attempt to heal a decades-old rift between the Church and a group of ultra-conservative breakaway group of clergymen, Pope Benedict XVI lifted the excommunication of four bishops. The four Catholic bishops belong to the Society of Saint Pius, which opposed changes in Catholic doctrine made in the 1960s under the Second Vatican Council.

One of them is Britain's Bishop Richard Williamson, who is being investigated for Holocaust denial in Germany, according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

In a recent interview with Swedish state television, Williamson denied the murder of six million Jews by the Nazis.

"I think that 200,000 to 300,000 Jews died in Nazi concentration camps, but none of them in gas chambers," Williamson told the interviewer.

"The historical evidence is hugely against six million Jews having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler. I believe there were no gas chambers," Williamson reportedly said.

He has also reportedly endorsed the anti-Semitic Protocols of the Elders of Zion and claimed that Jews are bent on world domination.

In a parallel development Tuesday, Bishop Bernard Fellay, the superior general of the Society of Saint Pius, distanced himself from Williamson's comments.

Fellay said he has forbidden Williamson from speaking publicly about any historical or political questions and that his views "don't reflect in any way the position of the society."

"We ask forgiveness of the Supreme Pontiff and all the men of good will for the dramatic consequences of this act," Fellay said.

Haifa Chief Rabbi Shear Yishuv Cohen, chairman of the Rabbinate's commission, told The Jerusalem Post that he expected Williamson to publicly retract his statements before meetings could be renewed.

"I understand the Pope's efforts to bring about unity in the Church, but he should be aware that, indirectly, he hurt Jews. We expect him to do the best to repair the situation." Weiner's letter called Williamson's comments "odious" and "outrageous."

Rabbi David Rosen, Director of the American Jewish Committee's Department for Interreligious Affairs, and an advisory member of the Chief rabbinate's commission, said that the Pope's decision has created an atmosphere of "bad faith."

Rosen reckoned that the Pope's move to lift Williamson's excommunication, which was made public just days before International Holocaust Day, was made due to a lack of proper consultation.

"I tend to believe that the Pope simply was not informed about Williamson in advance and now he is in a very uncomfortable situation."

Rosen said that the Pope had a history of improper preparation, leading to large-scale blunders. He cited a speech made in Regensburg, Germany, in which he quoted a medieval emperor who called Islam "evil and inhuman," comments that sparked a wave of Islamic-led violence against Catholic churches around the world.

Rosen said that the Rabbinate expected the Pope to take tangible steps against Williamson.

"I don't think it is my place to tell the Church precisely what to do. But Williamson should be censured in some way or forced to retract his statements.

"Until that happens, we may be in contact with the Vatican on an individual level, but there will be no official meetings."


Excuse me, but all this thin-skinned outrage from the Jews is just too tiresome already. It is almost as if they are looking for any excuse to find fault with the Pope and tantamount to saying he is pesonally responsible for every anti-Semitic opinion/attitude that any Catholic may possibly have.





TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 13:47



January 28

Memorial of St. Thomas Aquinas
Priest and Doctor of the Church



OR today.


No papal stories on Page 1. Main story - 50,000 stricken with cholera in Mugabe's Zimbabwe;
the UN summit in Madrid on the fight against hunger; President Obama's 'ecological New Deal';
and an editorial by American priest Robert Imbelli which ostensibly reflects on the new President's
inaugural speech to bring up Abraham Lincoln's first inaugural speech in which the Civil War President
prayed for 'the better angels of our nature' to prevail. Imbelli modulates into a prayer that
the angels of the unborn may not be ignored and that they may not be excluded from the pact of
citizenship demanded by the new President.



THE POPE'S DAY
General Audience today - The Holy Father made a statement about having revoked the excommunication
of four bishops belonging to the Prietly Fraternity of St. Pius X, and reiterates solidarity with the Jews
as the world marked Holocaust Memorial Day yesterday.


BENEDICT XVI'S GREETING
TO THE NEW PATRIARCH OF MOSCOW


The Vatican released the text of the congratulatory telegram sent by the Holy Father to the new Patriarch of Moscow, Kirill, who was elected yesterday after being the caretaker of the Russian Orthodox Church following the death last month of Alexei II.


As Metropolitan Kirill and #2 man to Patriarch Alexei, the new Patriarch visited Benedict XVI at the Vatican in December 2007.

TO HIS HOLINESS KIRILL
PATRIARCH OF MOSCOW AND OF ALL RUSSIA


I HAVE RECEIVED WITH GLADNESS THE NEWS OF YOUR ELECTION AS PATRIARCH OF MOSCOW AND ALL RUSSIA. I WARMLY CONGRATULATE YOU AND WISH YOU EVERY STRENGTH AND JOY IN THE FULFILMENT OF THE GREAT TASK WHICH LIES BEFORE YOU AS YOU GUIDE THE CHURCH OVER WHICH YOU NOW PRESIDE ALONG THE PATH OF SPIRITUAL GROWTH AND UNITY.

IN PRAYER, I ASK THE LORD TO GRANT YOU AN ABUNDANCE OF WISDOM TO DISCERN HIS WILL, TO PERSEVERE IN LOVING SERVICE OF THE PEOPLE ENTRUSTED TO YOUR PATRIARCHAL MINISTRY, AND TO SUSTAIN THEM IN FIDELITY TO THE GOSPEL AND THE GREAT TRADITIONS OF RUSSIAN ORTHODOXY.

MAY THE ALMIGHTY ALSO BLESS YOUR EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN COMMUNION AMONG THE ORTHODOX CHURCHES AND TO SEEK THAT FULLNESS OF COMMUNION WHICH IS THE GOAL OF CATHOLIC-ORTHODOX COLLABORATION AND DIALOGUE.

I ASSURE YOUR HOLINESS OF MY SPIRITUAL CLOSENESS AND OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH’S COMMITMENT TO COOPERATE WITH THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH FOR AN EVER CLEARER WITNESS TO THE TRUTH OF THE CHRISTIAN MESSAGE AND TO THE VALUES WHICH ALONE CAN SUSTAIN TODAY’S WORLD ALONG THE WAY OF PEACE, JUSTICE AND LOVING CARE OF THE MARGINALIZED.

WITH BROTHERLY AFFECTION IN THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, I INVOKE UPON YOU THE HOLY SPIRIT’S GIFTS OF WISDOM, STRENGTH AND PEACE.

BENEDICTUS PP. XVI



TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 14:18



GENERAL AUDIENCE TODAY

At the General Audience today, the Holy Father resumed his catechetical cycle on St. Paul, with reflections on the Apostle's letters to Timothy and Titus, his principal collaborators. Here is how he synthesized today's lesson in English:

In our catechesis on the writings of Saint Paul, we come now to the Pastoral Epistles, the two Letters addressed to Timothy and the one to Titus.

Although their authorship remains debated, these three Letters, while subsequent to the central years of Paul’s life and activity, clearly appeal to his authority and draw from his teaching.

Against threats to the purity of the apostolic tradition, they insist on a discerning understanding of the Scriptures and fidelity to the deposit of faith. Scripture and Tradition are seen as the "firm foundation laid by God" for the life of the Church (cf. 2 Tim 2:19), and the basis of her mission of leading all people to the knowledge of God’s saving truth (cf. 1 Tim 2:1-4).

The Pastoral Epistles also reflect the development of the Church’s ministerial structures, and in particular the emergence of the figure of the Bishop within the group of presbyters. They present the Church in very human terms as God’s household, a family in which the Bishop acts with the authority of a father.

Inspired by this vision, let us ask Saint Paul to help all Christians to live as members of God’s family, and their Pastors to be strong and loving fathers, committed to building up their flocks in faith and unity.

Before giving his final post-catechesis greeting to the faithful in Italian, he said he had three special messages to deliver. Here is a translation:


Before greeting the Italian-speaking pilgrims, I have three messages to communicate.

The first -

I learned with joy the news of the election of Metropolitan Kirill as the new Patriarch of Moscow and All the Russias. I invoke on him the light of the Holy Spirit for generous service to the Russian Orthodox Church, entrusting him to the special protection of the Mother of God.


The second -

In my homily on the occasion of the solemn inauguration of my Pontificate, I said that the 'call to unity' is the 'explicit' task of the Pastor.

Commenting on the Gospel passage on the miraculous catch of fish, I cited that "although there were so many (fish), the net was not torn” (Jn 21:11), continuing with the words: "Alas, beloved Lord, with sorrow we must now acknowledge that it has been torn! But no – we must not be sad! Let us rejoice because of your promise, which does not disappoint, and let us do all we can to pursue the path towards the unity you have promised... Do not allow your net to be torn, Lord, help us to be servants of unity!"

In compliance of this service of unity, which qualifies in a specific way my ministry as the Successor of Peter, I decided several days ago to grant the remission of the excommunication incurred by four bishops ordained in 1988 by Mons. Lefebvre without papal mandate.

I carried out this act of paternal mercy, because repeatedly, these prelates have shown their sincere suffering for the situation in which they were.

I hope that my gesture may be followed by their expeditious commitment to comply with further steps necessary to realize their full communion with the Church, by showing their true loyalty and true acknowledgment of the Magisterium and authority of the Pope and of the Second Vatican Council.


The third communication -

In these days when we commemorate the Shoah, I am reminded of the images gathered from my various visits to Auschwitz, one of the concentration camps where the brutal carnage of millions of Jews took place, innocent victims of blind racial and religious hatred.

Even as I renew with affection the expression of my full and indisputable solidarity with our brothers who were the beneficiaries of the First Alliance, I hope that the memory of the Shoah will lead mankind to reflect on the unpredictable power of evil when it conquers the heart of man.

May the Shoah be for everyone a warning against forgetting, against negation or reductionism, because violence committed against one single human being is a violence against all.

No man is an island, a famous poet wrote. May the Shoah teach both the old and new generations that only the effortful way of listening and dialog, of love and of forgiveness, can lead the peoples, cultures and religions of the world to the desired goal of brotherhood and peace in truth.

Never more should violence debase the dignity of man!






Here is a translation of his entire catechesis:


CATCHESIS #19
in the Pauline Year cycle


Dear brothers and sisters,

The last letters of the Pauline epistolary, about which I would like to talk today, have been called the Pastoral Letters, because they were sent to individual Pastors of the Church: two to Timothy and one to Titus, close collaborators of St. Paul.

In Timothy, the Apostle saw almost an alter ego: indeed, he entrusted him with important missions (to Macedonia: cfr At 19,22; to Thessalonia: cfr 1 Ts 3,6-7; to Corinth: cfr 1 Cor 4,17; 16,10-11), and later he would write a flattering eulogy: "I have no one with the same spirit as he, who will know how to concern himself at heart with the things that concern you" [My translation, for now, since the citation given is Phm 2,20, which is not the corresponding passage].

According to the Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius of Caesarea, from the 4th century, Timothy later became the first Bishop of Ephesus (cfr 1,4).

As for Titus, he too must have been very dear to the Apostle, who described him explicitly as "full of zeal... my companion and co-worker" (2 Cor 8,17.23), and even "my true child in our common faith" (Ti 1,4). He was charged with a couple of very sensitive missions to the Church of Corinth, the results of which encouraged Paul (cfr 2 Cor 7,6-7.13; 8,6).

Afterwards, when he was ordered to do so, Titus rejoined Paul at Nicopolis in Epirus, Greece cfr Tt 3,12), then was later sent to Dalmatia (cfr 2 Tm 4,10). At the time of the letter addressed to him, he was Bishop of Crete (cfr Tt 1,5).

The Letters addressed to these two Pastors occupy a very special place in the New Testament. Most exegetes now believe that these letters were not written by Paul himself, but that they come from 'the school of Paul", reflecting his legacy for a new generation, perhaps integrating some brief passage or words from the Apostle himself.

For example, some words from the Second Letter to Timothy seem so authentic that they could only have come from the heart and mouth of the Apostle himself.

Without a doubt, the ecclesiastical situation that emerges in these Letters is different from that during the central years of Paul's life. At that time, he described himself retrospectively as 'herald, apostle and teacher' of the pagans in faith and in truth (cfr 1 Tm 2,7; 2 Tm 1,11); He presented himself as someone who had obtained mercy because, as he wrote, "I was mercifully treated, so that in me, as the foremost, Christ Jesus might display all his patience as an example for those who would come to believe in him for everlasting life" (1 Tm 1,16).

Therefore, the essential thing was that in Paul - a persecutor converted in the presence of the Risen Lord - the Lord's magnanimity is an encouragement for us, to lead us to hope and to trust in the mercy of the Lord who, notwithstanding our smallness, is able to do great things.

Beyond the central years of Paul's life, new cultural contexts are also presupposed here [the letters to Timothy]. Indeed, there is an allusion to the emergence of teachings that were to be considered completely false and erroneous (cfr 1 Tm 4,1-2; 2 Tm 3,1-5), such as those that claimed matrimony was not a good thing (cfr 1 Tm 4,3a).

We see how modern that concern is, because even today, Scripture is sometimes read as an object of historical curiosity, and not as the word of the Holy Spirit, in which we can hear the voice of the Lord himself and recognize his presence in history.

We could say that the brief list of errors presented in the three letters anticipates some of the features of that subsequent erroneous orientation which went under the name of Gnosticism (cfr 1 Tm 2,5-6; 2 Tm 3,6-8).

The author confronts such doctrines with two basic recommendations. The first is to advise a spiritual reading of the Sacred Scripture (cfr 2 Tm 3,14-17), that is, a reading that considers it as truly 'inspired' and coming from the Holy Spirit, so that one may be instructed in salvation".

One reads Scripture correctly by placing oneself in conversation with the Holy Spirit, thereby obtaining light "for teaching, for refutation, for correction, and for training in righteousness" (2 Tm 3,16).

In this sense, the Letter adds: "so that one who belongs to God may be competent, equipped for every good work"(2 Tm 3,17).

The other reminder was to stress the good 'deposit' (parathéke): a special word in the pastoral Letters which refers to the tradition of apostolic faith that must be preserved with the help of the Holy Spirit who dwells in us.

This so-called 'deposit of faith' is to be considered as the sum of the apostolic tradition and as a criterion of faithfulness in announcing the Gospel.

We must also take into account that in the Pastoral Letters as in all of the New Testament, the term 'Scriptures' means explicitly the Old Testament, because the writings of the New Testament were either not written yet or were not yet part of the Scriptural canon.

Therefore, the Tradition of the apostolic announcement, this 'deposit', is the key for understanding Scripture, the New Testament. In this sense, Scripture and Tradition, Scripture and the apostolic teaching as interpretative key, are placed side by side, almost merging into each other to form together "God's solid foundation" (2 Tm 2,19).

The apostolic message, namely Tradition, is necessary to introduce us to an understanding of Scripture and to catch in it the voice of Christ. In fact, one must "hold fast to the true message [of faith] as taught" (Tt 1,9).

The basis of everything is precisely faith in the historical revelation of the goodness of God, who in Jesus Christ concretely manifested his 'love for all men", a love which in the original Greek text is significantly called 'phil-anthropy' [love of man] (Tt 3,4; cfr 2 Tm 1,9-10); God loves mankind.

Altogether, we can see that the Christian community was configuring itself in very clear terms, with an identity that not only keeps clear of incongruous interpretations, but affirms above all its own anchorage to the essential points of the faith, which here is synonymous to 'truth' (1 Tm 2,4.7; 4,3; 6,5; 2 Tm 2,15.18.25; 3,7.8; 4,4; Tt 1,1.14).

In faith is found the essential truth of who we are, who God is, how we should live. And the Church is defined as 'the pillar and foundation" (1 Tim 3,16) of this truth (the truth of faith).

In any case, she remains an open community, of universal breadth, who prays for all men of every order and rank, so that they may come to knowledge of the truth: "(God) wills everyone to be saved and to come to knowledge of the truth" that "Jesus Christ gave himself as ransom for all" (1 Tim 2,4-5).

Thus, the sense of universality, even if the communities were still small, was strong and determinative for these Letters. In addition, these Christian communities "slander no one" and "exercise all graciousness toward everyone" (Tt 3,2).

This is one important component of these Letters: universality and faith as truth, as a key to reading Sacred Scripture, of the Old Testament, thus delineating the unity of announcement and Scripture, and a faith open to everyone that bears witness to God's love for everyone.

Another typical component of these Letters is their reflection on the ministerial structure of the Church. They are the first to present her triple subdivision into bishops, priests and deacons (cfr 1 Tm 3,1-13; 4,13; 2 Tm 1,6; Tt 1,5-9).

We can observe in the Pastoral Letters the confluence of two different ministerial structures and thus, the constitution of the definite form of the Church ministry.

In the letters from the central years of his life, Paul speaks of 'bishops' (Phil 1,1) and of 'deacons': this was the typical structure of the Church as it took shape in the pagan world - in which the figure of the apostle remains dominant, and the other ministries developed gradually.

If, as mentioned, we had bishops and deacons in the Churches formed in the pagan world, and not priests, the latter were the dominant structure in the Churches that were formed in the Judaeo-Christian world.

At the end of the Pastoral Letters, the two structures are joined: thus appears 'the bishop' (cfr 1 Tm 3,2; Tt 1,7), always in the singular, and accompanied by the definite article - 'the bishop'. And beside the bishop, we find priests and deacons.

The figure of the Apostle was always determinative, but the three Letters, as I have said, were no longer addressed to communities but to individuals: Timothy and Titus, who on the one hand, appear as bishops, and on the other, start to take the place of the Apostle.

Thus we note initially the reality that will much later be called 'the apostolic succession'. Paul tells Timothy in very solemn tones: "Do not neglect the gift you have, which was conferred on you through the prophetic word with the imposition of hands on the presbyterate" 1 Tim 4, 14).

We can say that the words also mark the first appearance of the sacramental character of the ministry. And so we have the essential structure of the Catholic Church: Scripture and Tradition, Scripture and anouncement, forming an ensemble. But to this structure that we might call doctrinal, must be added the personal structure - the successors of the Apostles as witnesses to the apostolic message.

Finally it is important to note that in these Letters, the Church understands itself in very human terms, analogous to the home and the family. Particularly in 1 Tm 3,2-8, we can read very detailed instructions on the episcopate, such as these:

"A bishop must be irreproachable, married only once, temperate, self-controlled, decent, hospitable, able to teach, not a drunkard, not aggressive, but gentle, not contentious, not a lover of money.

"He must manage his own household well, keeping his children under control with perfect dignity, for if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how can he take care of the church of God?

"He should not be a recent convert, so that he may not become conceited and thus incur the devil's punishment. He must also have a good reputation among outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, the devil's trap".

One must note above all the important attitude towards teaching (cfr also 1 Tm 5,17), which finds an echo in other passages (cfr 1 Tm 6,2c; 2 Tm 3,10; Tt 2,1), and then, a special personal characteristic, that of 'paternity'.

Indeed, the bishop is considered the father of the Christian community (cfr also 3 Tim 3,15). Moreover, the idea of the Church as 'house of God' has its roots in the Old Testament (cfr Nm 12,7), reformulated in Heb 3,2.6.

Whereas in other passages we read that all Christians are no longer strangers nor guests, but citizens alongside the saints and familiars of the House of God (cfr Eph 2,19).

Let us pray to the Lord and to St. Paul that we too, as Christians, may always distinguish ourselves, in relationship to the society in which we live, as members of the 'family of God'.

And let us pray as well that the pastors of the Church may always have paternal sentiments, at once tender and strong, in the formation of thw House of God, of the community, and of the Church.





Pope Benedict expresses
'full and indisputable solidarity'
with the Jews

By ALESSANDRA RIZZO



VATICAN CITY, Jan. 28 (AP)- Pope Benedict XVI on Wednesday expressed his "full and indisputable solidarity" with Jews and warned against any denial of the horror of the Holocaust.

With his comments, the Pope was reaching out to Jews angered by his recent decision to rehabilitate a bishop who says no Jews were gassed during the Holocaust.

"As I renew my full and indisputable solidarity with our brothers," Benedict said, "I wish that the memory of the Shoah will prompt humanity to reflect on the unpredictable power of evil when it conquers the hearts of men." Shoah is a Hebrew word for the Holocaust.

"May the Shoah be a warning to everyone against oblivion, denials or reductionism," the Pope told thousands of pilgrims at a weekly audience at the Vatican.

The Vatican had already distanced itself from comments by bishop Richard Williamson, a Briton who has denied that 6 million Jews were murdered during World War II. The Holy See said that removing the excommunication by no means implied the Vatican shared Williamson's views.

Wednesday's remarks were the first comments on the issue by the Pope himself since the controversy erupted.

The German-born Benedict recalled his visits to the Auschwitz concentration camp — including as pope in May 2006 — and the "brutal massacre of millions of Jews, innocent victims of blind racial and religious hatred."

Benedict lifted the excommunication of Williamson and three other bishops last week.

The four were excommunicated 20 years ago after they were consecrated by the late ultraconservative Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre without papal consent — a move the Vatican at the time called an act of schism.

Williamson said in an interview broadcast last week on Swedish state TV that historical evidence "is hugely against 6 million Jews having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler."

He cited what he called the estimates of the "most serious" revisionists that "between 200,000-300,000 perished in Nazi concentration camps, but not one of them by gassing in a gas chamber."

Jewish groups, including the American Jewish Committee, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Israel's quasi-governmental Jewish Agency, denounced the Vatican for bringing a Holocaust denier back into the fold.

Benedict made clear from the start of his pontificate that he wanted to reconcile with Lefebvre's rebellious traditionalist Society of St. Pius X.

Lefebvre bitterly opposed the teachings of the Second Vatican Council, the 1962-65 meetings that brought liberal reforms to the church.

Benedict said Wednesday he had lifted the excommunication because the bishops had "repeatedly shown their deep suffering over the situation."


Pope 'Pepperl' makes the acquaintance of a lion cub ('Hello, Kitty!') after a circus troupe performs some variety acts for him.



OK, so it turns out 'Cubby' wan't quite the tame kitty he looked like in the first pictures, but our 'Pepperl' is unfazed:


Lion cub greets Pope with a roar



VATICAN CITY, Jan. 28 (AP) – Pope Benedict XVI was greeted by an unusual guest during his weekly audience at the Vatican: a feisty lion cub.

The beast was brought to the Pontiff in the Vatican's Paul VI hall on Wednesday as part of a performance by members of the Medrano Circus. An amused Benedict looked on as jugglers in sparkling costumes performed.

He got up when the lion cub was carried closer so he could pat it.

The lion's response: a roar, which drew laughter from the Vatican audience.




flo_51
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 15:10
Benedict said Wednesday he had lifted the excommunication because the bishops had "repeatedly shown their deep suffering over the situation."

Yes but he also said that he is now waiting for their full acceptation of church authority including Vatican II [SM=x40791]

And now they have no issue not to do so [SM=g27811]
maryjos
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 19:29
Exactly, Flo!!!!
Yes, Flo, and that's why his move was so well-considered. Today's bulletin from Vatican Information Service says it all and Papa also made a statement at the General Audience this morning.
Have you read Wulfrune's latest post on the Notables thread? If not, please do.
TERESA BENEDETTA
00mercoledì 28 gennaio 2009 23:14
[

In reply to a number of messages from new users (as well as a few veteran users but non-members) about the 'difficulty' of navigating within the Forum, I hope this helps:

FOR NEW VISITORS TO THE FORUM: To navigate within the page you are now on, scroll up or down as needed.
To see preceding entries in NEWS ABOUT BENEDICT, Click on 'Previous page', above right.
To get to other topic threads of the English section, click on the 'envelop' above right, tagged 'Fans speaking English' -
it will get you to the board with all the topic threads available in the section.
On that board, to get to the latest page containing the most recent entries on the topic you choose,
click on 'Last' in the parentheses indicating page numbers right after the subject title,
Once you get to that page, proceed as above.














Posted earlier today in the preceding page-

Grand Rabbinate of Israel decides to cut off all dialog with the Vatican

The Pope's day - A message-crammed General Audience. Full translations of 1) Pauline-cycle catechesis
on Timothy and Titus; 2) special messages for the new Patriarch of Moscow; 3) for the Jews as the world
remembers the Holocaust; and 4) explaining his gesture of paternal mercy towards the Lefebvrian bishops,
whom he calls on to take the next step towards full communion with the Church by recognizing the Magisterium
and authority of the Pope and the Second Vatican Council. And the Pope meets a feisty lion cub.







Cardinal Bertone speaks up
on the centrality of Vatican-II
in Benedict's Pontificate




ROME, January 28 (Translated from Apcom) - The Second Vatican Council is "a central statement in the pontificate of Benedict XVI" - Cardinal Tarciso Bertone said today, pointing out that the fact alone "should clear the field of any suspicions or criticisms such as those that have emerged in the past several days".

The Vatican secretary of state spoke about the "Main lines of Benedict XVI's Magisterium" at a conference sponsored by the Circolo di Roma at the Palazzo Diaconale of Santa Maria in Cosmedin.

He named that a characteristic mark of the German Pope's Pontificate was the incessant effort for reconciliation and unity, within the Church itself; in ecumenism, with other Churches and ecclesial communties and with other religions, beginning with Judaism".

In this connection, he pointed out that "the most acute and least conditioned Jewish leaders reocgnize the high level of dialog carried forward by Benedict XVI" even before he became Pope.

He cited as an example the widely praised document entitled "The Jewish People and their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible', which was issued by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger when he was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and president of the International Theological Commission.

As for the pursuit of 'reconciliation and unity' among Catholics themselves, Cardinal Bertone cited that before the recent recall of the excommunication incurred by the Lefebvrian bishops, the Pope had also issued a Motu Proprio that 'restored' the traditional Mass to current use, and his letter to the divided Catholics of China.






Here's a new development on the Israeli rabbis' earlier statement:

Rabbis say they have not
cut off dialog with Rome




ROME, Jan. 28 (Translated from Apcom) - "We have not interrupted our relations with the Vatican, because we believe that such a relationship is fundamental for us as well as for the Vatican,"

Thus did the director-general of the Rabbinate of Israel, Oded Wiener, speaking to the TV outlet Sky Tg24, deny a report earlier today that the rabbis were cutting off dialog with the Vatican because of FSPPX Bishop Richard Williamson's negationist statements about the Holocaust. [See story from the Jerusalem Post fond on the preceding page.]

"I do think that the Pope's words this morning [at the General Audience] were extremely important," he went on. "There is no place for people like Williamson who deny that the Holocaust happened. I think [the Pope's words] were a great step forward to resolve the question, but we must still thresh it out with the members of the bilateral commission of the Holy See and Israel in order to put an end to this problem."

"The fact that this man [Williamson] was excommunicated and has now been taken back by the Church after 20 years and practically on the very day of the annual Day of Memory to remember the Holocaust, on the commemorative week set aside by the United Nations, is incredible. He should be banned from any public place."

But Wiener said that the scheduled meeting on March 2 with the Vatican Commission for relations with the Jews has been postponed without a new date.

"The [Williamson] question needs to be discussed first. We have postponed the meeting until we can work it out with representatives of the Vatican. Certainly,. at such a historic moment and in a field that is so sensitive, the entire Jewish world was shocked buy this incident. And we should see what can be done to resolve it".

**********************************************************************

It is infuriating to read one-sided stories like this. The man was apparently speaking to a TV newsman. Why couldn't the newsman challenge all of Wiener's false assumptions and thorough misconception of what excommunication is? He may not have succeeded in denting the protective carapace that seems to keep many Jews impervious to reason and common sense where the Holocaust is concerned - but at least he might have enlightened viewers who were left with only Wiener's views to consider!



DPA has a sketchy wrap-up on today's developments.

Pope expresses 'solidarity'
with Jews on Holocaust






Vatican City, Jan. 28 (dpa) - Pope Benedict XVI on Wednesday, moving to quell outrage over a recently reinstated bishop's remarks denying the Nazi mass murder of the Jews, reiterated the Roman Catholic Church's "solidarity" with the Jewish people.

Benedict during his weekly general audience said the memory of the Holocaust (or Shoah) cannot be cancelled through any form of denial.

The German-born Pontiff also recalled his own past pilgrimages to the former Nazi death camp of Auschwitz whose January 27, 1945, liberation by Russian troops was widely commemorated on Tuesday.

"The images I collected during my numerous visits to Auschwitz bore witness to the innocent victims of a racial hatred," Benedict said of the site where the ovens used to cremate the bodies of those killed are still visible.

"Let its memory be a warning against oblivion, (Holocaust) denial and reductionism," Benedict said of Auschwitz which he last visited in May 2006 during his apostolic trip to Poland.

The Pontiff's remarks came in the wake of mounting pressure on the Vatican to issue a robust response after one of four pardoned [they were not pardoned in any way! - properly, a canonical penalty was withdrawn] ultra-traditionalist bishops, British-born Richard Williamson, said he did not believe the Holocaust had taken place.

While not referring to Williamson directly, Benedict during the general audience also said he had asked the four bishops, whose 1988 excommunication he revoked last week, to adhere to the Church's Second Vatican Council teachings.

The clerics belong to the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), which broke with Rome over Church reforms introduced in the 1960s through the Second Vatican Council, including a declaration which prescribes brotherly relations with Jews. [In fairness, the SSPX does not object to 'the relations with Jews' alone ,but with all other non-Catholic religions as posing a risk of syncretism!]

And while on Tuesday the Vatican said the other three bishops had asked Benedict to forgive their colleague while distancing themselves from his remarks, many critics described the response as "unsatisfactory."

Benedict's words, on the other hand, were "necessary and welcome and contribute to clear many misunderstandings," over Holocaust-denial, Rome's Chief Rabbi Riccardo Di Segni said in his reaction Wednesday according to the ANSA news agency.

Di Segni was among many who strongly condemned the Vatican's announcement last Saturday - just days after Williamson's offending remarks were aired on Swedish television [Remarks made last November, but re-broadcast to exploit the unfortunate fact that Williamson is in the news bigtime] - that the four bishops had been accepted back into the mainstream church. [Not exactly!]

Fallout from the controversy has included Israel's Chief Rabbinate breaking off indefinitely official ties with the Vatican to protest the lifting of Williamson's excommunication, according to report Wednesday by the Jerusalem Post newspaper.

The Chief Rabbinate also cancelled a meeting scheduled for March 2-4 in Rome with the Holy See's Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.

And Israel's Ambassador to the Holy See, Mordechai Lewy, in an interview published Wednesday in the Corriere della Sera newspaper, said clarity was needed on the issue from the Vatican's "highest levels."

However, papal spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said Benedict's general audience remarks "should be more than sufficient" in settling the issue of where the Pope and the Church stood on the issue of the Holocaust.

Meanwhile, the row's repercussions were also being felt in the German city of Regensburg, where Williamson made his Holocaust remarks to a Swedish interviewer and where SSPX has a training centre.

Regensburg's Catholic bishop said Wednesday that Williamson, who is based in Argentina, would not be allowed to set foot in his cathedral or any other church property.

German public prosecutors have opened an inquiry against Williamson over his remarks. Holocaust denial is a crime in Germany.

benefan
00giovedì 29 gennaio 2009 03:57
This article was written on the 24th so it's a bit dated but it makes some interesting points.


Pope Benedict is taking a huge risk in lifting the SSPX excommunications

Damian Thompson
Telegraph.co.uk
Jan 24, 2009

What does the removal of the excommunication of the four Lefebvrist bishops - one of whom is a Holocaust denier - mean for the papacy of Benedict XVI?

I am not going to jump to conclusions. The Pope is not endorsing the vile opinions of Bishop Richard Williamson. Nor, so far as I can tell, has he lifted the suspension of these bishops from their ministry.

Clearly, Pope Benedict has come to the conclusion that if the SSPX is to rejoin the mainstream of the Church – still quite a distant prospect - all the bishops consecrated by the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1988 must first be readmitted to communion with Peter.

This is going to be a very hard sell for the Vatican PR machine, not one of the world's best. How does it persuade the Jewish community that this olive branch to Bishops Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta is not an insult to them?

Williamson is increasingly a loner inside the SSPX, but his fellow bishops have never publicly attacked him for denying the existence of Nazi gas chambers or for affirming the authenticity of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Yet, on the other hand, I've been surprised by how many Catholics who are not fans of the SSPX believe that this is the right step to take. They do not believe that Richard Williamson will ever exercise ministry as a Roman Catholic bishop: they think he is likely to storm off at some stage in the complicated negotiations that lie ahead.

The Pope is walking a tightrope. He has chosen to do so. He believes that, at the other end, lies the full absorption of the Lefebvrists into the Catholic Church, under Roman discipline. For that to happen, the SSPX will have to make huge concessions - recognising, for example, the validity of the Second Vatican Council (without necessarily endorsing it decisions). Goodness knows how the arrangements will work out in practice. Will the wound be healed or deepened? Most French liberal bishops would refuse to be in the same room as their Lefebvrist counterparts.

This is the biggest risk Pope Benedict has taken in his pontificate so far. He knows that he will provoke a loud outcry from Jewish groups and many Catholics, who will be horrified at any concession to the barking mad Bishop Williamson and his fan club.


Pope Benedict is in some ways an isolated figure, even in the Vatican. Many of his own cardinals do not show him the loyalty he deserves. This decree, signed by Cardinal Re, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, could increase that isolation. But of one thing we can be sure: Joseph Ratzinger has already factored the hostile reaction into the equation.

Let's wait and see. Tens of thousands of Catholics now appear to be heading back into full communion with the Church. But at what price?

*********************************************************************


I find Thompson's last question 'At what price?' at odds with the rest of his blog. If he acknowledges that Pope Benedict 'already factored the hostile reaction into the equation', that's all that needs to be said.

The Good Shepherd goes out to look after one stray lamb whom he considers to be just as important as the 99 others who are already in the fold. [Of course, it is not possible for him to 'woo back' cafeteria Catholics en masse as he can try to do with the FSSPX, since cafeteria Catholics are1) not schismatic, to begin with, 2) not organized as the FSSPX is, and 3) their offenses against the Church and Catholicism are on the same routine order as the offenses every human being, including the Lefebvrians, commits against the law of God.]

Hostile reaction from certain circles is the price the Pope knows he has to pay for making any decision that errs against political correctness - especially in this media-driven world where 'perception' is all, and never mind actual reality. The price, in fact, paid by anyone who errs against political correctness in any way.

It's the price of standing by your principles in today's world, if such principles happen to be against the prevailing secular-liberal Zeitgeist.

Popes are above all that - they stand for what the Church teaches, as Christ taught the Apostles. Timeless, eternal truths, not subject to the latest opinion poll or the hoity-toity superciliousness of so-called opinion makers or special interest groups, including some Jewish circles.

A politically correct person would say "I cannot do this because I might provoke the Jews further", but then, politically correct people have no principle except 'Don't offend the sensitive in any way - But Catholics have thick skins, so let's throw everything we can at them!"
Politically correct people are the most sanctimonious hypocrites possible.

It's unseemly to suggest in any way that the Pope should count the cost - least of all, to himself - before doing what he believes to be the right thing.

My second objection - and I knowe Thompson is an intelligent devout Catholic whose loyalty to the Pope is always manifest - is the statement, often loosely made, that "Pope Benedict XVI in some ways is an isolated figure".

First, it is intrinsically meaningless because all people at the very top, especially the most high-profile spiritual leader on the globe - is 'in some ways an isolated figure", so that's no particular insight.

But applying it to Benedict XVI followed by the statements that many cardinals are not loyal to him and that the decree on the Lefebvrians could 'increase that isolation' concretizes the supposed 'isolation'.

If all but a handful of cardinals and the overwhelming majority of the worldwide clergy and faithful were against the Pope, then one might say he is 'isolated'.

But 'isolated' implies being closed off, out of touch with others and with the world, being on an island by yourself if we go by its literal etymology.

Obviously, that is not the case with Benedict XVI, who not only counts with many personal friends, even among the cardinals of the Curia, but also with the professional friendship and esteem of his intellectual peers - with all of whom he is in constant contact, if not by letters and telephone calls as we know he is with many of them, then through their writings. What's more, he also reads - and reads a lot!

Not to mention his many general and special audiences and other direct contacts with his bishops, clergy and faithful.

Someone who constantly receives a flow of bishops from around the world coming on ad-limina visit - whose reports on the state of the Church in their respective countries and dioceses he studies before he even meets them - is not an isolated person by any definition.

I can understand when a hostile, biased journalist like Marco Politi cavalierly and regularly makes the statement that Benedict is 'isolated' and 'lives in an ivory tower'. But I expect someone like Damian Thompson to be more judicious when he makes similar statements.

Opposition from some cardinals is perfectly normal, but it is not isolation. And an intelligent, cultured person like Joseph Ratzinger, who has always paid particular attention to what is going on in the secular world as well as within the Church, is unlikely to be isolated or to isolate himself in any way.



TERESA



TERESA BENEDETTA
00giovedì 29 gennaio 2009 13:27
I had started to post Sandro Magister's article in www.chiesa in this space,
but I held back because I have too much trouble with the translation provided.

In any case, here is the link to the English translation of the article:
chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/214086?eng=y



TERESA BENEDETTA
00giovedì 29 gennaio 2009 13:27



January 29
Saints Sarbelius and Barbea, Martyrs



OR today.

At the end of the General Audience, the Pope expresses 'full and indisputable solidarity' with the Jews:
'The Shoah a warning against forgetting and negation'
After revoking their excommunication, he calls on FSSPX bishops tkrecognize the Magisterium of the Pope and Vatican II

Other Page 1 stories: The Pope welcomes the election of the new patriarch of Moscow; and a story on President Obama's
interview with Arab TV.




THE POPE'S DAY

The Holy Father met with

- Bishops from Russia on ad-limina visit. Address in Italian.
- Mons. Antoni Stankiewicz, Vdean of the Tribunal of the Rota Romana
- College of Prelate-Auditors, Tribunal of the Rota Romana.
Address in Italian.


Pope tells bishops of Russia
united Christian witness is necessary





The Catholic Church has four ecclesiastical districts in Russia; Archbishop Paolo Pezzi (with the Pope, right photo) heads the Mscow district.


Vatican City, Jan 29, 2009 (CNA) - With the challenges that our society is currently facing, it is necessary that Christians be united, Pope Benedict XVI told prelates from Russian Federation, who are winding up their ad-limina visit.

During his meeting with the bishops, the Holy Father praised their commitment to re-launching participation in the liturgy and the Sacraments, catechesis, the formation of priests, and to the preparation of a mature and responsible laity capable of becoming an evangelical ferment in families and in civil society."

He then encouraged the prelates not to lose heart in the face of difficulties or when their pastoral efforts to do not appear to be rewarding. "Rather," he continued, "nourish - in yourselves and in your collaborators - an authentic spirit of faith, with the evangelical awareness that Jesus Christ will not fail to make your ministry fruitful with the grace of His Spirit."

Pope Benedict also raised the issue of promoting vocations to the priesthood and religious life, and asked the Russian bishops to lend more support to priestly and religious formation.

"Look to the formation of consecrated people and the spiritual development of the lay faithful, that they may come to consider their lives as a response to a universal call to sanctity, which must find expression in coherent evangelical witness in all the circumstances of daily life."

The need for a “renewed commitment to dialogue” between the Catholic and Orthodox,” was also touched on by the Pope, who noted that "despite the progress that has been made," this relationship "still encounters difficulties."

With this in mind, the Holy Father reiterated his best wishes to the newly-elected patriarch of Moscow and All Russia, Metropolitan Kirill, "for the delicate ecclesial task with which he has been entrusted."

This dialogue is necessary to unite Christians who "face the great cultural and ethical challenges of the present moment, which concern the dignity and the inalienable rights of the person, the defense of life at all stages, the protection of the family, and other pressing economic and social questions," the Holy Father continued.

Ending his address, Pope Benedict expressed his "profound gratitude" to the prelates for their faithfulness and ministry, and to the priests, religious and lay people who “collaborate with you in the service of Christ and His Gospel."



Benedict XVI discusses role
of mental incapacity in annulments






Vatican City, Jan 29, 2009 (CNA) - Pope Benedict gathered the Roman Rota at the Vatican this morning to mark the end of the judicial year and to speak about marriage annulments involving mental incapacity.

The meeting was attended by the dean, judges, promoters of justice, defenders of the bond, officials and lawyers of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota, also known as the Church’s court.

This issue raised by the Pope dealt with questions surrounding annulment cases that could involve mental incapacity on behalf of one of the spouses.

Noting that John Paul II also addressed the same issue in his meetings with the Roman Rota in 1987 and 1998, Pope Benedict said that John Paul II’s words "give us the basic criteria, not only for studying the psychiatric and psychological examinations, but also for the judicial definition of the causes."

The Code of Canon Law's norm concerning mental incapacity was further enriched, he noted, by the Instruction 'Dignitas connubii' of January 25, 2005.

Benedict XVI explained that certifying that a mental incapacity existed must meet specific conditions: "there must be a specific mental anomaly that seriously disturbs the use of reason at the time of the celebration of the marriage, ... or that puts the contracting party not only under a serious difficulty but even under the impossibility of sustaining the actions inherent in the obligations of marriage."

The Church must not fall into a pessimistic view of marriage that "considers marriage as almost impossible," the Holy Father warned.

"Reaffirming the inborn human capacity for marriage is, in fact, the starting point for helping couples discover the natural reality of marriage and the importance it has for salvation. What is actually at stake is the truth about marriage and about its intrinsic juridical nature, which is an indispensable premise if people are to understand and evaluate the capacity required to get married," the Pope said.

"Such capacity," he explained, "must be associated with the essential significance of marriage - 'the intimate partnership of married life and love established by the Creator and qualified by His laws' - and, particularly, with the essential obligations inherent to marriage that must assumed by the couple."

Finally, Pope Benedict cautioned the jurists about "certain 'humanistic' schools of anthropology, which tend towards self-realization and egocentric self- transcendence." These schools "idealize human beings and marriage to such an extent that they end up denying the mental capacity of many people, basing this on elements that do not correspond to the essential requirements of the conjugal bond."

"In principle, causes of nullity through mental incapacity require the judge to employ the services of experts to ascertain the existence of a real incapacity, which is in any case an exception to the natural principle of the capacity necessary to understand, decide and accomplish that giving of self upon which the conjugal bond is founded."


OTHER VATICAN EVENTS
The Pontifical Council for Culture held a news conference to present the initiatives of the Holy See
and its associated institutions for the International Year of Astronomy, including an International
Conference on Galileo to be held in Florence on May 26-30.


TERESA BENEDETTA
00giovedì 29 gennaio 2009 16:35



The English-language media, going by the online lists of Benedict XVI/Vatican news press currently in circulation, is still stuck with the original news report about the statement released to the media by the Grand Rabbinate of Jerusalem yesterday [before it had sent the letter about its decision to the Vatican, according to the Italian media) - and before the Pope's General Audience yesterday.

But an Italian news agency reported a change of heart by the same Rabbinate yesterday after the audience [See translation in one of the posts above on this thread]. Here are further details translated from the overall news story on the Pope's GA and the fallout from his initiative with the Lefebvrians, in today's issue of


January 29, 2008


...But later, the Rabbinate drew back and welcomed the words of Benedict XVI as "a big step forward to resolve the issue".

The statement came from the same Oded Weiner, director-general of the Israeli Rabbinate [who had issued the earlier belligerent statement], who said: "It is a very important declaration for us and for the entire world". [Though it's not as if it was the first time Benedict XVI has ever expressed his views and that of the Church about the Holocaust and anti-Semitism in general!]

He also said the Rabbinate has not made a decision about the next scheduled meeting of the bilateral working group of the Vatican and Israel.

"Our letter arrived in the Vatican only today [Wednesday], and consequently, we will not make any decision until we receive an answer."

The Rabbinate considers the work of the bilateral commission - begun eight years ago after the visit of John Paul II to Israel - "an extremely important historical dialog which has allowed extraordinary personal relationships to ripen".

Weiner praised the Pontiff's statements [at the General Audience] but "now further steps by the Church are needed".

Mordechai Lewy, the Israeli ambassador to the Holy See, also said that the Pope's words "were very clear and useful to clear up the misunderstandings that have arisen. Whoever read or heard them understands on whose side the Church is. Besides, it makes it clear that the Pope thinks the way of dialog should be pursued in the future." [Like it was not clear before yesterday! I think all this apparent naivete by some Jewish representatives is deliberate and a form of intellectual dishonesty. ]

On the Pope's planned visit to Israel, expected to take place in May but not officially confirmed, Lewy said: "We are working on it - whatever has happened in the past few days has not affected preparations for the trip. The Pope is welcome in Israel at any time"

Fr. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman said shortly after the Pope's General Audience, that "The Pope's words, on the different occasions in which he has said them in the past and today, should be sufficient to respond to those who express any doubts on the position of the Pope and the Church".

**********************************************************************


The lesson here for all those who are handling (or mishandling) Vatican communications - Fr. Lombardi included - is that whenever the Pope or the Church says or does something that directly or indirectly concerns the Jews in any way, they should act pre-emptively and pro-actively, unequivocally and forcefully, to make it clear the action or statement does not in any way reverse what the Church and all the Popes have been saying repeatedly since 'Nostra aetate'.

It's exasperating, and, to right-thinking people, unnecessary, but in today's ultra-sensitive, ultra-mediatized world, you can't lose by being extra-careful in public communications.

A number of intelligent commentary has already been written in the past few days about this continuing failure of the Vatican communications machinery to follow the elementary rules of communication, especially in the Internet age:
- Always cover your bases! (In this case, cover the Pope - for God's sake! (literally and metaphorically ); and
- Never take anything for granted - least of all, common sense and reason.

As for the Jewish hairsplitters, it seems nothing will ever satisfy them until and unless the Pope has all his garments stitched visibly with the words "We love the Jews, we condemn anti-Semitism, and the Shoah must never happen again."

What is happening, in effect - and almost more concerning than any dysfunction and derangement in the communications effort of the Vatican - is that the most prominent Jewish representatives today appear to be displacing all the blame for the Holocaust on the Catholic Church, which is made to answer each and every moment for the Holocaust and anti-Semitism, made to appear it is primarily and directly responsible for these two execrable phenomena - as if Hitler and the Nazis committed their atrocious crimes in behalf of the Catholic Church.

"If Pius XII had spoken, the Holocaust would not have happened" [which any sensible person would know is bullshit] is really code for saying "The anti-Semitic tradition in the Catholic Church led to Hitler's policy of genocide against the Jews", never mind that Hitler and all his propagandists only ever cited crank Aryan propagandists and paganists to justify their anti-Jewish policy.

And so, you hardly ever hear any Jew today denounce Hitler and the Nazis for the Holocaust. No, any blame is only ever laid on Pius XII and the Catholic Church.

I think that is a most unjust attempt at historical revisionism that has not been commented enough upon!



**********************************************************************


Here's a thoughtful commentary on how this episode has played out so far in the public arena:


The difficult job of working out
a mismanaged case:
Israel recognizes Benedict XVI's
'big step forward'
but it's still an embarrassing mess

by Massimo Franco
Translated from

January 29, 2009


The effort to stitch the wound is obvious. And the 'big step forward' that the words of Benedict XVI yesterday represent for the Israeli Rabbinate is a sign that the attempt has been understood.

After the unworthy statements made by Bishop Richard Williamson denying the horror of the Nazi concentration camps, the Pope spoke against ever forgetting the Holocaust and against 'negation and reductionism' about it.

But the perplexity remains over the way in which a reconciliation between the Vatican and the Lefebvrians was prepared [for the public], and about the way in which the Vatican under-estimated the context in which it takes place.

We are struck by the fact that a Pope has been forced quite a few times now to explain the positions of the Vatican.

The kind explanation is that there is an intrinsic difficulty in communicating Church positions. The less kind explanation is that the Vatican's communications problems arise from some kind of extemporaneity (i.e., lack of preparation).

Which results in a Vatican leadership that claims to be surprised by "an anomalous, unforeseen and unexpected fact' like the Williamson case, in teh words of Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Vatican Secretary of state, and therefore, exposed to misunderstandings, incomprehension and tensions.

Benedict XVI had to use all of his own personal prestige to stem all the resulting attacks. Both L'Osservatore Romano and the Vatican spokesman, Fr. Federico Lombardi, spelled out the true nature of the Vatican strategy towards Israel, saying that the dialog between the Catholic Church and the Judaism must continue "in fruitful tranquillity".

The fact that the Diocese of Regensburg [where Williamson made his statements last November] has banned Williamson from coming back there reinforces the fact that the incident was in no way acceptable to the Church.

But some temporal coincidences made the situation particularly embarrassing.

First, the 50th anniversary of John XXII"s announcement that he was calling a second Vatican Council, which the Lefebvrians have rejected; and the personal opinion by some of them denying or minimizing the Nazi extermination of the European Jewry.

Negotiations for bringing back the Lefebvrian rebels into the fold of orthodox (mainstream and 'official') Catholicism have been going on for a long time. It was clear the Church wished to do this before teh second Lefebvrian generation can take over, since they might be less open to any calls for Church unity.

But the timing and the way the announcement of the Pope's decision to revoke the excommunication of the Lefebvrian bishops was at the lvery least counter-productive.

Now, after the Pope's statements on Wednesday, the impression is that both the Holy See and the Israeli government wish to repair the negative effects of the entire episode.

It has even been proposed that now might be the time for Benedict XVI to visit the Synagogue in Rome.

Formally, the plan for a papal trip to the Holy Land is still in place.

But yesterday, David Rosen, an adviser to the Jerusalem Grand Rabbinate DIM]8pt[=DIM][also director of the American Jewish Committee's department of inter-religious affairs, and one of teh few Jewish leaders who had been conciliatory over the Good Friday prayer] said that the "important, good and useful statement" from Benedict XVI is not enough.

Rosen said the Williamson case leaves a wave of ambiguity that obscures the "moving and impressive" condemnation of anti-Semitism made by John Paul II. [All of a sudden, Rosen ignores that Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI ever denounced anti-Semitism at all - and that he was the late Pope's closest collaborator and theological adviser in the entire process of conciliating the Jews! Perhaps Rosen should also look at the Vatican Radio account of the number of times Benedict XVI has spoken out on the Holocaust and anti-Semitism since he became Pope!]

Cardinal Bertone replied by defending Benedict XVI and saying that this unfortunate episode would be 'filed away'. Bertone's words may represent more the expression of a hope rather than of reality.


**********************************************************************


About this last, yesterday I posted the translation of an APcom item reporting that Cardinal Bertone had addressed a Roman association and commented on the fallout from the Williamson case - but it was a very short item that did not say enough.

The first thing I did was to check if the 1/29/09 issue of OR (the selection already being online at the time) would have a longer story or even the text of what Bertone said. But it did not. (I hope they report on it in the 1/30 issue - which won't go online for another 6 hours.)

I checked the OR's archive which maintains a separate section for 'The interventions of Cardinal Bertone', but the last intervention posted there is dated December 31, 2008 - i.e., it does not even include anything of what he said at the World Encountere of Families in Mexico City, where he represented the Pope! Now, that's typical of the snail's pace of Vatican communications. (I cannot understand why Fr. Lombardi - who can and does keep Vatican Radio abreast of events almost to the very second - can't do the same with all the rest of the Vatican media, trnaslations included!)

In the midst of a communications fiasco of unforgivable incompetence, how could the Vatican communications machinery continue to be so 'out of it' as not to publicize for all they can what the #2 man at the Vatican had to say about the crisis of the moment?

It may be that Bertone delivered his address after the 1/29 issue had gone to press, but for such an important matter, the editors could and should have anticipated the event, obtained a copy of Bertone's text and published the relevant part (with the necessary proviso that it came from a text prepared for delivery but not yet delivered at the time the paper went to press).

In communications, timeliness and promptness are just as essential as the message itself.



P.S. Yes, the OR has a story in tomorrow's issue on Cardinal Bertone's statements yesterday, which I will translate shortly. But as Apcom reported, the subject of the lecture was "The main lines of Benedict XVI's Magisterium", so his remark on the Lefebvrian iissue was scant and in general terms.





benefan
00giovedì 29 gennaio 2009 18:10
A loathsome Catholic --but still a Catholic

Michael Coren
National Post (Canada)
Published: Wednesday, January 28, 2009

According to various headlines across the world, the Pope has "welcomed back into the Church a Holocaust-denying Bishop" and "Ripped to shreds Catholic-Jewish relations for a generation." Which says a great deal more about media inaccuracy and hysteria than it does about what has just happened within the Roman Catholic Church.

What Pope Benedict actually did this weekend was to lift the excommunication of four bishops who were illicitly consecrated by the late-archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1988. Among them was Richard Williamson, an execrable individual who is indeed an unrepentant Holocaust denier and anti-Semite. But the original excommunication had nothing to do with these bishops' views and neither does the removal of the excommunication. Indeed one of the most significant obstacles to this welcome and sensible move was the reputation of Williamson, who hates the Vatican as much if not more than he dislikes Jews. He also, by the way, believes that The Sound of Music is a pornographic movie and that no self-respecting person should ever watch it. So as repulsive as he may be, the man is also a buffoon.

The history of the issue dates back to Vatican II in the early 1960s. The council's recommendations were relatively mild but they were almost immediately purposely misinterpreted and abused so as to remove Latin from the Mass, ignore Papal teachings and attempt to transform the historic Church into a stew of ecumenical and subjective ideologies. This concerted liberal campaign did enormous damage, but a new generation of Catholics who rejected 1960s and '70s relativism and embraced a resurgent orthodoxy, empowered by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, have now won the day. During the darkest times, however, up to a million traditional Catholics left the Church to worship with The Society of St. Pius X, founded by the French Archbishop Lefebvre.

The vast majority of those who joined were merely conservative Catholics who were understandably disturbed by many of the excesses performed, incorrectly, in the name of Vatican II. Others, though, and many within the leadership, embraced a much more reactionary agenda. Some spoke fondly of collaborationist Vichy France, supported the French National Front and not only rejected the Second Vatican Council but denied that the Church had the authority to call it. Which was, of course, a paradoxically Protestant approach. Most infamous of all these leaders was, and is, Richard Williamson, who recently gave an interview on Swedish TV in which he claimed that there were no Nazi gas chambers and that the "so-called Holocaust" was a myth.

It's partly to isolate this invincibly smug wing nut and his followers, a small minority within the Society of St. Pius X organization, that the Pope has expunged the excommunication: The main reason behind the action is the hope that hundreds of thousands of devout Catholics will return to the mainstream Church. Whether this will happen is open to question, but it's likely that if it does, Williamson, who would not be accepted as a bishop within the Church, would leave and form yet another sect.

Yet to concentrate on this man is not only an absurd digression from the real debate but also plays directly into his hands, giving him and his rancid ideas a profile they simply do not deserve. He is, as it were, a legend in his own lunchtime.

Numerous European cardinals and archbishops, including in France and Germany, have publicly welcomed the Papal announcement while simultaneously restating the self-evident fact that the Holocaust happened, that it was devilish, that Jesus, Mary and the Holy Family were Jewish and that to be anti-Semitic is to be anti-Christian.

It's not clear what else they can say or do. There are numerous Catholics who have dreadful beliefs, but they cannot be excommunicated merely for being wrong or bad. There are legions of alleged Catholics, even priests, who have taught fundamentally anti-Catholic theories and not been excommunicated; and just this week, for example, a number of senior American politicians who still claim to be part of the Church publicly encouraged eugenics and the killing of unborn children.

It's a complex and often disturbing dynamic, one addressed squarely by Pope John Paul the Great when he openly wept inside the great synagogue in Rome and spoke of the pain and suffering of the Jewish people and how a new bond of love and common fate had developed. All of his magnificent gestures toward the Jews were shared and supported by Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Ratzinger.

That journey of testament to testament continues to this day, and to let it be halted by a lone, despised hater would be a terrible sin. Let him scream away at the songs of Julie Andrews while the real world, and the real Church, moves forward. - Michael Coren appears every weeknight on the Michael Coren Show, 8 p. m., on CTS. www.michaelcoren.com.

*********************************************************************

Coren's commentary is most welcome, but unfortunately, Catholic writers who have taken the time and effort to say all these things - obvious to any informed Catholic - in the mainstream media have been rare.

And I think that the overwhelming majority of Catholics really do not know what excommunications really is, except that it is a 'terrible punishment' from the Church.

One can fault the secular media for reporting the recall of the excommunications as equivalent to pardoning someone like Williamson for his anti-Jewish views, but they are simply reflecting the general ignorance over what excommunication is.

Still, this does not in any way excuse the reporters from failing to do due diligence in checking out their facts first, and not simply winging it on a cavalier assumption, even if it is shared by most everyone. They had and have a duty to check out their facts.

Any online reference would make it clear to them that excommunication is not a punishment for every offense imaginable - not even for serial murder and repeated rapes, as I have been saying in this Forum from the very start of this contretemps. It is a disciplinary measure for some specific violations of canon law- the administrative law of the Church - not of civilian or criminal law, not even of the Ten Commandwents!

But no! MSM reporters and commentators either did not do their homework, or more likely, chose not to, because they saw this as a golden opportunity to hit on the Church and the Pope yet again - after all, they are just about the only targets left on earth that the mindset of the times excludes from the rules of political correctness.

Oh yes! it's always open season on the Church and the Pope, and it will always be politically correct to hit on them, no matter how unjustly, wrongly and fallaciously.

As Christ rightly warned, his followers will always be 'a sign of contradiction' in the world.

No one is more aware of this than Benedict XVI, but this does not mean that even Vatican media itself should 'dis-serve' him at crucial moments by failing to anticipate that a technical matter like lifting an excommunication would not be understood by the general public unless it was first explained to them.

TERESA


P.S. I also think the headline given to Coren's piece reflects the bias of whichever desk editor gave it that headline.

It is misleading, because the issue here is not and never can be who Williamson is as an individual. He just happened to be one of four persons who were excommunicated at the same time for the same reason, and so, the excommunication cannot be lifted from the three but denied to him, all because he happens to be who he is as an individual, which had nothing to do with why he was excommunicated to begin with.

If we were to go into his biography, one would immediately note that, quite apart from all his cuckoo views, he was also an Anglican who was somehow deemed worthy by the FSSPX of being ordained a Catholic priest within 4 years of his conversion!

Perhaps it says more of the late Mons. Lefebvre's misjudgments that he considered someone like Williamson worthy enough to be one of the four he ordained as bishops with the express intention of carrying on the cause after him.


TERESA BENEDETTA
00giovedì 29 gennaio 2009 23:30



Vatican and traditionalists:
A story whose end has not been written

By John Thavis




VATICAN CITY. Jan. 29 (CNS) -- In the long-standing conflict between the Vatican and the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X, Pope Benedict XVI has been a key figure in reconciliation efforts that, so far, have always fallen short.

When the Pope lifted the excommunication of four of the society's bishops in January, it finally seemed to open the way to the elusive "full communion" between the society's leadership and the Catholic Church.

But the ending of this story has not yet been written, and even inside the Vatican there are questions about what the Pope's latest move really signifies for the short term and the long term.

One of the biggest short-term questions regards the standing of the Swiss-based society's bishops and priests -- specifically, whether in the Vatican's view they remain suspended from their ministry until a more complete agreement is reached.

The answer, according to several Vatican sources, is that there's no clear answer. The Vatican's own experts had different interpretations of how canon law applies in this case. Some felt that the removal of excommunication for the four bishops implied removal of their suspension, but others disagreed.

Most at the Vatican hold that the priests of the Society of St. Pius X remain suspended from ministry until they are regularized, which presumably will happen in future talks between the Vatican and the society's leaders.

In the meantime, Masses celebrated by these priests are considered valid, even though illicitly celebrated; but other sacraments carried out by the suspended priests, like marriage and confession, are not valid, in the view of several canon law experts.

In a sense, the Vatican has decided to look past what one official called a "canonical mess" and focus instead on the overriding goal: how to reach full communion.

There were some hopeful signs. Vatican officials said Bishop Bernard Fellay, head of the society, had already begun "pacification" efforts among the society's priests and seminarians in France and Germany to prepare them for re-entry into official unity with the universal church.

Bishop Fellay, they said, seemed to appreciate that Pope Benedict has built a bridge to the society by making two decisions that were not very popular among mainstream Catholics: lifting the excommunications, and restoring wider use of the 1962 form of the Mass, known as the Tridentine rite. [How absurd to make a sweeping statement such as the two decisions were not very popular among mainstream Catholics. How does Thavis or anyone know what 'mainstream Catholics' really think, seeing that there are more than a billion Catholics apread around the world? The statement should at least be qualified by a line like 'mainstream Catholics this writer knows'.

All journalists should be guided by a criterion used by medical journals on any article submitted to them: You cannot make a definitive statement about anything that involves prevalence or incidence of any condition unless you can cite a valid study with sufficient statistical power (meaning the study was conducted on a great enough number of persons with respect to the possible base; and there's a simple formula for determining that) - and statistical significance (meaning, there is a minimum probability that the results are random, which another simple formula can determine).

I doubt that the overwhelming majority of 'mainstream Catholics' are even aware of the Lefebvre dispute, and as for the traditional Mass, it seems from all reports since July 7, 1977, that the issue only interests two groups - those who are interested in the traditional Mass in any way whatsoever, and those who oppose it ideologically and at all costs. It's hard to believe they could make up a significant persentage of 1.2 billion!]


But Vatican officials said much remains to be negotiated -- "about a hundred details," in the words of one source.

The Society of St. Pius X appears to be counting on Pope Benedict to make one more big concession: the granting of a special jurisdictional status to the society that would allow members to continue their traditional practices with some degree of autonomy.

The more problematic issues are not jurisdictional but doctrinal, and the elephant in the room is the Second Vatican Council.

The council was not mentioned in the official Vatican decree removing the excommunication or the accompanying statement. When he thanked the Pope for his action, Bishop Fellay made a point of saying that the society accepts all the church councils "up to the Second Vatican Council, about which we express some reservations."

In fact, the four bishops and many society members have at various times rejected Vatican II teachings on such matters as liturgy, ecumenism, interreligious dialogue and religious liberty, and blamed the council for the current "crisis" in the church.

"They'll have to resolve that for sure," said one Vatican official.

The only one to publicly mention Vatican II in connection with the future negotiations has been Pope Benedict. At his general audience Jan. 28, he said he hoped the society was ready to recognize the teaching and authority "of the Pope and of the Second Vatican Council." If the past is any guide, those will be tough talks.

Some Vatican sources said that while the excommunication removal is a major Vatican concession, it also puts more pressure on the society to come to an agreement on full communion. [DUH!] For one thing, they said, the canon law ambiguities that are now being tolerated cannot be allowed to continue indefinitely.

Pope Benedict has been close to agreement with the society before. As Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, at the request of Pope John Paul II, he conducted 11th-hour talks in 1988 with the late French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the society's founder.

Archbishop Lefebvre had been suspended from his ministry in 1976 after ordaining priests against Vatican orders and was threatening to ordain bishops -- a move the Vatican said would result in schism and the automatic excommunication of those involved.

Cardinal Ratzinger was authorized to make concessions, and the two sides appeared to reach an agreement under which the Society of St. Pius X would be established as an organization of "pontifical right" with limited control by local bishops. [So, isn't there reason to suppose that Benedict XVI would now be looking at that juridical model which was acceptable 20 years ago to Lefebvre himself?]

The plan foresaw the creation of a Vatican commission to oversee relations among the society, the Roman Curia and bishops. It allowed the society to use pre-Vatican II liturgical books.

It proposed -- subject to the Pope's approval -- the naming of a bishop chosen from among members of the society. And it called on the society's leaders to adopt an attitude of "study and communication" regarding the previously rejected teachings of Vatican II.

Archbishop Lefebvre signed the protocol agreement, but before final approval he changed his mind. Soon after that, he went ahead with the ordinations, saying new bishops were needed so his society could continue to "guard against the spirit of Vatican II" and fight the "false ecumenism" that was leading the Church to ruin.

In 2000, when society members came to Rome for a Holy Year pilgrimage, the Vatican tentatively resumed talks with the society. More than once over the last eight years, the Vatican came close to losing patience. Pope Benedict's current actions have opened a window of opportunity, but Vatican officials say it may not remain open forever.


**********************************************************************


I must confess I have no particular reason for optimism that the FSSPX leadership will do the right thing and the sensible thing now that the Pope has reached out as far as he can already. I wish their rosary campaign to pray for the lifting of the ec-coms had also included a prayer to teh Holy Spirit to guide them to what is right!

We can all help the Church and our Pope by praying that his gestures will not have been in vain, so that the FSSPX tear in the fabric of the Church may be repaired.


**********************************************************************

Earlier this week, I posted this useful Q&X from Father Zuhlsdorf in REFLECTIONS ON OUR FAITH... I think I should post it here as well, just to clear up some practical questions.

Clearing up any misconceptions:
What the 'lifting” of the SSPX excom
means in effect

By Father John Zuhsldorf
o{]:¬)

January 24, 2009


...VERY LITTLE HAS CHANGED JURIDICALLY except in the status of those four bishops.

I hope that this has helped to change the "atmosphere" surrounding these problems.

The "lifting" of the excommunications is a first step in the long process that still remains.

Q: Is the SSPX now legitimate?

Not in a juridical sense, no. The SSPX still does not have the approval of the Pope or of a diocesan bishop. It is still a separated group, though these days many prefer not to speak of "schism".

Q: Is it okay for the SSPX bishops to ordain now?

No. The bishops of the SSPX are validly consecrated bishops, but the fact remains that they were illicitly consecrated. That hasn’t changed. They are still not reconciled with the Bishop of Rome. They are still suspended a divinis. They still have no permission to exercise ministry in the Church. They may not licitly ordain. They have no authority to establish parishes, etc.

Q: Are the chapels of the SSPX okay now?

Not in a juridical, legal sense, no. Many good things can happen in one of those communities, but the SSPX chapels are not, because of the lifting of the excommunications, suddenly made legitimate. They are not reconciled by this move.

Q: Are the priests of the SSPX in good standing now?

Not yet they aren’t. The priests of the SSPX are still suspended a divinis. They say Mass validly, but without the permission of the Church, either from a faculty of the Holy See or the local bishop. They do not have the necessary faculties to hear confessions and give sacramental absolution except in danger of death.

Q: Is it okay to go to chapels of the SSPX for Mass?

Yes and no. It is still not "okay" to go to chapels of the SSPX if you are doing so out of contempt for the Holy See or Holy Father, etc. If are are deeply attached to the older form of Mass, and it is very hard on you to go without it, yes, you can attend these Masses our of devotion. You can fulfill your Sunday obligation still, because the 1983 Code of Canon Laws says you do.

But the fact remains that these are still chapels separated from unity with the local bishop.

In my opinion, it is not a good idea to go to these chapels exclusively except perhaps in very rare circumstances wherein there really is no acceptable alternative.

Q: Is it okay to receive Communion at an SSPX Mass?

Yes and no. Yes… if you would otherwise have to go without the Eucharist for a long time because you are morally or physically impeded from receiving in a licit way. No… if you are doing so because of contempt for the Pope, bishop, Holy See, etc.

I don’t think it is a good idea to frequent and receive Communion often in the chapels of the SSPX. I think that undermines a person’s sense of unity with the Holy Father and the local bishop.

Remember: The lifting of the excommunications was a necessary step on the way to something better.

In his letter to followers of the SSPX, Bp. Fellay reminded everyone that they prayed that the older form of Mass would be derestricted, and it was with Summorum Pontificum. He said there was a Rosary campaign to aid the lifting of the excommunications. That happened today. Bp. Fellay now says that we must pray that the necessary talks with the Holy See can begin soon about theological questions. Amen. Let us pray.

So… folks… don’t suddenly get it into your head that all the problems with the SSPX have suddenly been removed. Nothing has changed about their status.

What changed was the status of the four bishops: they are no longer excommunicated, but they are still in a state of separation from clear and manifest unity with the Holy Father.




Jan.30, 2009
P.S. Here is how the National Catholic Reporter used Thavis's story in its current issue:



The headline picks out a line from Thavis's article out of context to mock
the Holy Father's efforts. Moreover, note the apparent typographical error;
I do not know if 'jestures' was a deliberate mis-spelling as an intended -
and malicious - play on words. If it was not, then the NCR should hire
a new proofreader! I find the general pettiness of NCR editors and columnists -
with respect to the Pope and positions they do not share - rather revolting.

But I would note, as I should have - but carelessly overlooked - at the time I posted the aritcle, that Thavis himself makes a misleading statement in his first sentence, which the NCR used, to wit
:

In the long-standing conflict between the Vatican and the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X, Pope Benedict XVI has been a key figure in reconciliation efforts that, so far, have always fallen short.

Thavis obviously means that the reconciliation efforts in general have always fallen short, but his syntax can easily give the impression that it is Benedict's specific efforts that have "fallen short'.

There have been two phases of his personal involvement in these efforts. In 1988, he undertook the negotiations with Mons. Lefebvre and reached an agreement which Lefebvre signed. It was not his fault that the latter decided a few days later not to honor it.

The second phase is obviously the present one, which began with his meeting with Mon. Fellay in August 2005.

In both cases, he has dealt directly with the superior of the schsimatic community. And in the second case, a step has been taken forward that did not happen in the past 20 years.


TERESA BENEDETTA
00venerdì 30 gennaio 2009 02:10



Mons. Fellay 'recognizes'
Vatican II theologically,
says Cardinal Castrillon



The other day, an Italian newspaper carried an item reporting in great detail a supposed angry tirade by Cardinal Givoanni Battista Re, PreFect of the Congregation for Bishops, on the bus that took some Curia members and some media representatives to the Basilica of St. Paul outside the Walls for the Sunday Vespers that ended the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.

The report quotes Cardinal Re as using epithets to describe Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos supposedly for not having informed the Pope nor Re - who had to sign the decree revoking the excommunications - that Williamson had made the statements he did, implying (or saying outright even) that Cardinal Castrillon knew but chose not to tell the Pope.

The report was so unseemly and distasteful if true - to begin with, why would a Cardinal 'air the dirty linen' that way at all, even if there were no media on board? - that I decided not to translate it or even refer to it.

For some reason, no one else in the Italian media that I can see appeared to pick up the story for reasons of their own, except an incidental reference to it in one of the many stories about Williamson. But as Cardinal Re has not explicitly denied it, it may have happened as the report has it.

Without referring to Cardinal Re, Cardinal Castrillon has now given his side to Corriere della Sera. Of course, he volunteers something more newsworthy but the Corsera editor did not think it worth the headline.



'I was in touch only with Fellay;
we knew nothing of the interview'

Translated from





VATICAN CITY - "Look, I was in charge of dialog with the FSSPX. But the dialog was always done through the superior, Mons. Bernard Fellay. And up to the last moment [of the negotiations preeceding the decree], we had absolutely no knowledge of the Williamson interview. It was never even brought up."

Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, as president of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, was in charge of the negotiations with Mons. Fellay about a reconciliation with Rome.

The day before the Vatican formally announced the revocation of the excmommunication of Mons. Fellay and 3 other bishops (ordained along with him by the late Mons. Marcel Lefebvre in 1988 in defiance of Pope John Paul II), the international media broke the news about an interview that Bishop Richard Williamson had given to Swedish state TV in November 2008. In it, he made statements denying in effect that the Holocaust happened.

The news was released by Swedish TV to advertise that it was broadcasting the interview that very night (January 24).

Cardinal Castrillon said:

"By that time, everything was done. The decree was signed on January 21, and when I handed over the signed decree to Mons. Fellay, we knew nothing of the Williamson interview. When the news broke on January 24, the FSSPX already had the signed decree in their hands.

"I won't get into details because that would be beyond my competence. But we did what needed to be done".

He wa sure of one thing, he added. "Full communion will come. In our conversations, Mons. Fellay recognized Vatican-II theologically. But there rest a few more difficulties."

Would that include the FSSPX objections to Nostra aetate, which represents a turning point in the official Church position with regard to non-Christian religions?

"No," said the cardinal. "That is not a problem. The questions have to do with ecumenism and religious freedom."

He concluded that he was happy that the Pope spoke about the matter yesterday: "His words make clear once again the thinking of the Church even with regard to the horrible crime of the Holocaust."



P.S. I mistakenly slugged this item initially as coming from Il Foglio. I apologize - especially since I had translated from a PDF printout that said Corriere della Sera right there!



Questa è la versione 'lo-fi' del Forum Per visualizzare la versione completa clicca qui
Tutti gli orari sono GMT+01:00. Adesso sono le 12:25.
Copyright © 2000-2024 FFZ srl - www.freeforumzone.com