problema systema punti 2

buongiorno, li supplico di perdonare il mio italiano, in buono francesi parlo soltanto la mia lingua e moderatamente l'inglese. Traducendo BN in francese per farla scoprire nel mio club, ho affrontato preoccupazioni tecnico. Nel paragrafo 4,1 sugli obiettivi è detto che per un combattimento tra esercito professionale ed irregolare, su uno 6 l'obiettivo principio dell'esercito regolare diventa un obiettivo falso, io non comprende l'interesse di ritirare 50 punti di sconfitta potenziale all'esercito professionale o è ciò che è per compensare il vantaggio dei risultati 1 a 5?

welcome, can you repeat in English please, probably it is easier for me to understand

thanks a lot ,
I can't understand this part 4.1:
"2) Regulars against Irregulars. As above, but in this case the player with the Irregular forces rolls a die, the
result of which is kept secret until the end of the game. The value of the roll 1-5 alters the status of that
regular player's marker to a primary objective. If however a 6 is rolled then the original primary becomes a
fake objective.
This creates more uncertainty for the regular force, as the irregular force knows more about both sets
objectives on the table than the regular. It is possible for the irregular player to roll the same result as the
original primary objective, then no change in objectives actually takes place.

I don't see the advantage give by the field knowledge to the irregular player by taking off to the regular player his primary objectif. If he didn't have a primary objectif he can't loose it, so he has avoid 50 defeat points?

the idea is that the regulars have an order (take an objective, for example documents or a prisoner etc). But may happen that they Intelligence failed and the troops are sent in the wrong place or simply too late.
In this case there is no an objective so it is just a firefight and a "bodycount" to see the winner (no 50pts in this case)

ok, thanks, I continu to think that it's a gift to the régular player (even if he doesn't know until the end of the game that he don't have to protect his primary objectif)if the irregular player have a primary objectif to lost. I will let it like that in the translation and I will play this case to see if it is as easier for the regular or irregular player.
if i am not convinced, I would make a home rule (each one don't have primary objectif for exemple I don't know)or see if the comunity has already make one.
thank for the time give to my question.

if you find a better home rule is fine, please share in this forum so can be adopted.
Actually I'm working to a new edition of the rules to be a real book. If you want to help with the French version you are welcome :-)

of course it will be a pleasure, it is quit strange to translate from english to french an italian game, but after playing to special forces, ambush alley and opex, I find your rull much playable and funny that much other, simple but not simplitic. And I love the idea to have bad points to show that there is no really winner on the battlefield. Tell me if you want to put on the web the draft 1.5.1 in french to make french's mouth water waiting the book, I will send it to you.

when you have the text ready,please send to me.It will take time before the final version of the rules will be ready and then translated to French, so French speaking people can start to try the "beta" version.

just before sending it to you, could you tell me what is positive point for the journalist.
1) Giornalisti embedded. Raddoppiano tutti i punti sconfitta del giocatore regolare a cui è “affidato”, ma
raddoppiano anche in positivo i punti dell'obbiettivo primario.

you save 20pts, if you are making a balanced game.

But consider that these rules are also for scenario games, so non necessary "balanced"

sorry, perhaps I didn't express myself well.
in the english rulls, it is wrote that the journalist double in positive the point give for protecting his primary objectif.
But lost an objectif give defeat point, but not protect it. Or it is general rule for specifiques scenrii?

the rule of "breaking news" in french

dl.free.fr/tMZCHXqgB